Visual “playback” of colorful signals in the field supports sensory drive for signal detectability

Abstract Colorful visual signals are important systems for investigating the effects of signaling environments and receiver physiology on signal evolution as predicted by the sensory drive hypothesis. Support for the sensory drive hypothesis on color signal evolution is mostly based on documenting correlations between the properties of signals and habitat conditions under which the signals are given (i.e., a correlational approach) and less commonly on the use of mathematical models that integrate representations of visual environments, signal properties, and sensory systems (i.e., a functional approach). Here, we used an experimental approach in the field to evaluate signal efficacy of colorful lizard throat fans called dewlaps that show geographic variation in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. We used a remote controlled apparatus to display “fake dewlaps” to wild lizards to test for adaptive divergence in dewlap brightness (i.e., perceived intensity) among populations in situ. We found evidence of local adaptation in dewlap brightness consistent with the sensory drive hypothesis. Specifically, dewlaps that had the brightness characteristics of local lizards were more likely to be detected than those with the brightness characteristics of non-local lizards. Our findings indicate that simplified mathematical representations of visual environments may allow robust estimates of relative detectability or conspicuousness in natural habitats. We have shown the feasibility of evaluating color signal efficacy experimentally under natural conditions and demonstrate the potential advantages of presenting isolated components of signals to an intended receiver to measure their contribution to signal function.

[1]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  J. Uy,et al.  Variable visual habitats may influence the spread of colourful plumage across an avian hybrid zone , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[3]  M. Cummings SENSORY TRADE-OFFS PREDICT SIGNAL DIVERGENCE IN SURFPERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  T. Price Sensory Drive, Color, and Color Vision , 2017, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Stamps,et al.  Species Identity Cues in Animal Communication , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[7]  T. Guilford,et al.  Conspicuousness and Diversity in Animal Signals , 1997 .

[8]  M. Boeckle,et al.  Divergent Receiver Responses to Components of Multimodal Signals in Two Foot-Flagging Frog Species , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  J. Endler,et al.  Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays , 2004 .

[10]  J. Endler,et al.  The Processes of Evolution: Toward a Newer Synthesis , 1988 .

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  N. Lovejoy,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AND SIGNAL ONTOGENY IN A SYMPATRIC ASSEMBLAGE OF ELECTRIC FISH , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  Aaron Christ,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[14]  D. Mennill,et al.  The Evolution of Signal Design in Manakin Plumage Ornaments , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[15]  M. Leal,et al.  Sensory system properties predict signal modulation in a tropical lizard , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  M. Schneider,et al.  Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish , 2008, Nature.

[17]  M. Théry,et al.  Simultaneous Crypsis and Conspicuousness in Color Patterns: Comparative Analysis of a Neotropical Rainforest Bird Community , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[18]  David L. Clark,et al.  Species recognition of color and motion signals in Anolis grahami: evidence from responses to lizard robots , 2013 .

[19]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[20]  Hans Winkler,et al.  Vertical lek placement of forest-dwelling manakin species (Aves, Pipridae) is associated with vertical gradients of ambient light , 2003 .

[21]  K. Marchetti Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence , 1993, Nature.

[22]  Danielle A. Klomp,et al.  Color pattern facilitates species recognition but not signal detection: a field test using robots , 2017 .

[23]  K. Summers,et al.  Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  J. Endler,et al.  Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them , 2005 .

[25]  M. Leal,et al.  Evidence for habitat partitioning based on adaptation to environmental light in a pair of sympatric lizard species , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  R. Foster,et al.  Visual pigments and oil droplets in diurnal lizards: a comparative study of Caribbean anoles. , 2002, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  J. Boughman How sensory drive can promote speciation , 2002 .

[28]  M. Whiting,et al.  Natural Selection on Social Signals: Signal Efficacy and the Evolution of Chameleon Display Coloration , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[29]  D. Kemp,et al.  An Integrative Framework for the Appraisal of Coloration in Nature , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[30]  P. Marler,et al.  Response of male song and swamp sparrows to neighbour, stranger, and self songs. , 1981 .

[31]  M. Frye,et al.  Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  R. Glor,et al.  CORRELATION BETWEEN ANOLIS LIZARD DEWLAP PHENOTYPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION INDICATES ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE OF A SIGNAL IMPORTANT TO SEXUAL SELECTION AND SPECIES RECOGNITION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  M. Leal,et al.  Visual motion detection and habitat preference in Anolis lizards , 2016, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  M. Leal,et al.  Why do Anolis dewlaps glow? An analysis of a translucent visual signal , 2016 .

[36]  J. Macedonia,et al.  Does Selection Favor Dewlap Colors that Maximize Detectability? A Test with Five Species of Jamaican Anolis Lizards , 2014 .

[37]  N. Marshall,et al.  Communication and camouflage with the same 'bright' colours in reef fishes. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[38]  Joshua J. Schwartz Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  J. Tobias,et al.  Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[40]  E. Derryberry EVOLUTION OF BIRD SONG AFFECTS SIGNAL EFFICACY: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST USING HISTORICAL AND CURRENT SIGNALS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  W. E. Miller,et al.  The visual ecology of Puerto Rican anoline lizards: habitat light and spectral sensitivity , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  A. S. Rand,et al.  An Estimation of Redundancy and Information Content of Anole Dewlaps , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Nikita Finger,et al.  Testing the Sensory Drive Hypothesis: Geographic variation in echolocation frequencies of Geoffroy's horseshoe bat (Rhinolophidae: Rhinolophus clivosus) , 2017, PloS one.

[44]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Species-specific recognition in birds: an experimental investigation of Wilson's storm-petrel (Procellariiformes, Hydrobatidae) by means of digitalized signals , 1991 .

[46]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[47]  H. Römer,et al.  The Signaller's Dilemma: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Public and Private Communication , 2010, PloS one.

[48]  J. Endler,et al.  ANIMAL VISUAL SYSTEMS AND THE EVOLUTION OF COLOR PATTERNS: SENSORY PROCESSING ILLUMINATES SIGNAL EVOLUTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  L. Persson,et al.  Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[51]  L. Fleishman Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in anAnolis lizard , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[52]  L. Fleishman,et al.  The influence of stimulus and background colour on signal visibility in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[53]  M. Leal,et al.  Habitat light and dewlap color diversity in four species of Puerto Rican anoline lizards , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[54]  M. Leal,et al.  Differences in Visual Signal Design and Detectability between Allopatric Populations of Anolis Lizards , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[55]  L. Fleishman The Influence of the Sensory System and the Environment on Motion Patterns in the Visual Displays of Anoline Lizards and Other Vertebrates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[56]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .