Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities

Companies should investigate possible patent infringement and cope with potential risks because patent litigation may have a tremendous financial impact. An important factor to identify the possibility of patent infringement is the technological similarity among patents, so this paper considered technological similarity as a criterion for judging the possibility of infringement. Technological similarities can be measured by transforming patent documents into abstracted forms which contain specific technological key-findings and structural relationships among technological components in the invention. Although keyword-based technological similarity has been widely adopted for patent analysis related research, it is inadequate for identifying patent infringement because a keyword vector cannot reflect specific technological key-findings and structural relationships among technological components. As a remedy, this paper exploited a subject–action–object (SAO) based semantic technological similarity. An SAO structure explicitly describes the structural relationships among technological components in the patent, and the set of SAO structures is considered to be a detailed picture of the inventor’s expertise, which is the specific key-findings in the patent. Therefore, an SAO based semantic technological similarity can identify patent infringement. Semantic similarity between SAO structures is automatically measured using SAO based semantic similarity measurement method using WordNet, and the technological relationships among patents were mapped onto a 2-dimensional space using multidimensional scaling (MDS). Furthermore, a clustering algorithm is used to automatically suggest possible patent infringement cases, allowing large sets of patents to be handled with minimal effort by human experts. The proposed method will be verified by detecting real patent infringement in prostate cancer treatment technology, and we expect this method to relieve human experts’ work in identifying patent infringement.

[1]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[2]  M. Mogee,et al.  Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology , 1993 .

[3]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Using WordNet in a Knowledge-Based Approach to Information Retrieval , 1995 .

[4]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[5]  Rain Chen,et al.  Design patent map visualization display , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent portfolios for strategic R & D planning , 1998 .

[7]  김광수,et al.  SAO 기반의 의미론적 특허 유사성을 활용한 특허맵 생성방법 , 2011 .

[8]  Claude Crampes,et al.  Litigation and Settlement in Patent Infringement Cases , 2002 .

[9]  Alan L. Durham.  Patent Law Essentials: A Concise Guide , 1999 .

[10]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Jih-Jeng Huang,et al.  Interval multidimensional scaling for group decision using rough set concept , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection , 1994, ACL.

[13]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Natural Language Processing of Patents and Technical Documentation , 2004, Document Analysis Systems.

[14]  Deborah F. Swayne,et al.  Data Visualization With Multidimensional Scaling , 2008 .

[15]  Sandra Müller,et al.  Patent-Based Inventor Profiles as a Basis for Human Resource Decisions in Research and Development , 2005 .

[16]  Von-Wun Soo,et al.  A cooperative multi-agent platform for invention based on patent document analysis and ontology , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells , 2011, Scientometrics.

[18]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures , 2004 .

[19]  S. S. Ravi,et al.  Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering with Constraints: Theoretical and Empirical Results , 2005, PKDD.

[20]  Andrew W. Mead.  Review of the Development of Multidimensional Scaling Methods , 1992 .

[21]  Masao Masugi,et al.  Hierarchical-clustering-scheme-based analysis of electrostatic discharge current in terms of an electromagnetic interference assessment , 2006 .

[22]  J. Kruskal.  Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[23]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[24]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[25]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[26]  Dean V. Williamson,et al.  INCOMPLETE CONTRACTING AND THE STRUCTURE OF R&D JOINT VENTURE CONTRACTS , 2004 .

[27]  Roberto Franzosi,et al.  From Words to Numbers: A Set Theory Framework for the Collection, Organization, and Analysis of Narrative Data , 1994 .

[28]  Paul A. Watters,et al.  Statistics in a nutshell , 2008 .

[29]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Roy Thurik,et al.  Productivity Convergence in OECD Manufacturing Industries , 2000 .

[31]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[32]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[33]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  Evaluating the Risk of Patent Infringement by Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA Chips , 2008 .

[34]  Yi-Hsuan Lai,et al.  Modeling patent legal value by Extension Neural Network , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Martin G. Moehrle.  Measures for textual patent similarities: a guided way to select appropriate approaches , 2010, Scientometrics.

[36]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[37]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees , 2008, IFIP CAI.

[38]  Dekang Lin,et al.  Dependency-Based Evaluation of Minipar , 2003 .

[39]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part II, Multidimensional Scaling , 1997 .