Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?

[1]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Pollution Haven or Halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint , 2023, Gondwana Research.

[2]  Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al.  How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises , 2023, Energy Economics.

[3]  B. Gyamfi,et al.  Colligating ecological footprint and economic globalization after COP21: Insights from agricultural value-added and natural resources rents in the E7 economies , 2023, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[4]  Pinelopi Tsalaporta,et al.  Reversing environmental deterioration: the role of human capital in developing countries , 2023, Economic Change and Restructuring.

[5]  Abdul Rahim Ridzuan,et al.  CO2 Emissions from Renewable and Non-Renewable Electricity Generation Sources in the G7 Countries: Static and Dynamic Panel Assessment , 2023, Energies.

[6]  N. Apergis,et al.  Investigating the association among CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Uzbekistan: an ARDL approach , 2023, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Analyzing the co-movement between CO2 emissions and disaggregated nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption in BRICS: evidence through the lens of wavelet coherence , 2023, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Syed Ahtsham Ali,et al.  Impact of natural resource rents and economic growth on environmental degradation in the context of COP-26: Evidence from low-income, middle-income, and high-income Asian countries , 2023, Resources Policy.

[9]  Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al.  Natural resource dependency and environmental sustainability under N-shaped EKC: The curious case of India , 2023, Resources Policy.

[10]  A. Acheampong,et al.  Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy, and environmental quality nexus: An investigation of the N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve based on six environmental indicators , 2023, Energy.

[11]  Abdelmohsen A. Nassani,et al.  Linkage among Urbanization, energy Consumption, economic growth and carbon Emissions. Panel data analysis for China using ARDL model , 2023, Fuel.

[12]  Ramez Abubakr Badeeb,et al.  Aggregate and disaggregate impact of natural resources on economic performance: Role of green growth and human capital , 2022, Resources Policy.

[13]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Going away or going green in NAFTA nations? Linking natural resources, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability through the lens of the EKC hypothesis , 2022, Resources Policy.

[14]  M. Usman,et al.  Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[15]  A. Awan,et al.  How far renewable energy and globalization are useful to mitigate the environment in Mexico? Application of QARDL and spectral causality analysis , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[16]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. , 2022, Environmental research.

[17]  G. Aydin,et al.  Development of regression models to forecast the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels in the BRICS and MINT countries , 2022, Energy.

[18]  R. Kousar,et al.  Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[19]  Atif Jahanger,et al.  Do technological innovation and urbanization mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from the transport sector? , 2022, Technology in Society.

[20]  T. Adebayo,et al.  The role of renewable energy consumption and financial development in environmental sustainability: implications for the Nordic Countries , 2022, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[21]  Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al.  Energy mix with technological innovation to abate carbon emission: fresh evidence from Mexico applying wavelet tools and spectral causality , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Divine Q. Agozie,et al.  Can technological innovation, foreign direct investment and natural resources ease some burden for the BRICS economies within current industrial era? , 2022, Technology in Society.

[23]  Fengsheng Chien.  How renewable energy and non-renewable energy affect environmental excellence in N-11 economies? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[24]  J. Garcı́a-Ramos,et al.  CO2 emissions and causal relationships in the six largest world emitters , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[25]  S. Tarba,et al.  Factors encouraging foreign direct investment (FDI) in the wind and solar energy sector in an emerging country , 2022, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[26]  Chao Wang,et al.  The integrated impact of GDP growth, industrialization, energy use, and urbanization on CO2 emissions in developing countries: Evidence from the panel ARDL approach. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Danish,et al.  An empirical investigation between renewable energy consumption, globalization and human capital: A dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[28]  Raufhon Salahodjaev,et al.  Renewable energy and CO2 emissions intensity in the top carbon intense countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[29]  Taimoor Hassan,et al.  The nexus between CO2 emissions, human capital, technology transfer, and renewable energy: evidence from Belt and Road countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  M. Mohsin,et al.  Assessing the effects of fuel energy consumption, foreign direct investment and GDP on CO2 emission: New data science evidence from Europe & Central Asia , 2022, Fuel.

[31]  D. Singh,et al.  Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic feasibility studies of biodiesel production from Mahua (Madhuca longifolia) in India , 2022, Energy.

[32]  T. Adebayo,et al.  CO2 behavior amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy development , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[33]  M. Usman,et al.  Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? , 2022, Energy Policy.

[34]  Hayat Khan,et al.  Examining the effect of information and communication technology, innovations, and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission: evidence from BRICS countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[35]  Usman Mehmood,et al.  Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  M. Irfan,et al.  Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: The role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[37]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  Analyzing energy innovation-emissions nexus in China: A novel dynamic simulation method , 2022, Energy.

[38]  R. Muttarak,et al.  Climate change experiences raise environmental concerns and promote Green voting , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[39]  Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al.  Mexico at the crossroads of natural resource dependence and COP26 pledge: Does technological innovation help? , 2022, Resources Policy.

[40]  S. Kamel,et al.  The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence , 2022, Energy Reports.

[41]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[42]  A. Caglar,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in the BRICS economies: The role of partnerships investment in energy and economic complexity , 2022, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments.

[43]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The role of renewable energy and urbanization towards greenhouse gas emission in top Asian countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[44]  Shizhen Wang,et al.  Nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable & non-renewable energy and carbon emissions: Contextual evidence in carbon neutrality dream of USA , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[45]  F. Bekun,et al.  Re-examining the roles of economic globalization and natural resources consequences on environmental degradation in E7 economies: Are human capital and urbanization essential components? , 2021, Resources Policy.

[46]  F. Bekun,et al.  Pathway to environmental sustainability: Nexus between economic growth, energy consumption, CO2 emission, oil rent and total natural resources rent in Saudi Arabia , 2021, Resources Policy.

[47]  M. Usman,et al.  What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development , 2021 .

[48]  A. Jahanger.  Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[49]  Rizwan Raheem Ahmed,et al.  The effects of non-renewable energy, renewable energy, economic growth, and foreign direct investment on the sustainability of African countries , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[50]  R. Ray,et al.  What is the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global carbon emissions? , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.

[51]  A. Bashir,et al.  How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries' economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation , 2021, Energy.

[52]  Usman Mehmood,et al.  Renewable energy and foreign direct investment: does the governance matter for CO2 emissions? Application of CS-ARDL , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[53]  Xiaoyan Li,et al.  Caring for the environment: how CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies? , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[54]  M. Usman,et al.  Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: Do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter? , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[55]  Recep Ulucak.  Renewable energy, technological innovation and the environment: A novel dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation , 2021 .

[56]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[57]  Kunrong Li,et al.  Host country’s environmental uncertainty, technological capability, and foreign market entry mode: Evidence from high-end equipment manufacturing MNEs in emerging markets , 2021, International Business Review.

[58]  Zhichao Yin,et al.  Time-Varying Impact of Economic Growth on Carbon Emission in BRICS Countries: New Evidence From Wavelet Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[59]  M. Rahman,et al.  Impacts of human capital, exports, economic growth and energy consumption on CO2 emissions of a cross-sectionally dependent panel: Evidence from the newly industrialized countries (NICs) , 2021, Environmental Science & Policy.

[60]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Policy Simulations for abating emissions in a complex economy: Evidence from the Novel Dynamic ARDL , 2021 .

[61]  Abdulai Abdul Majeed,et al.  Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda , 2021, Sustainable Development.

[62]  Hazwan Haini.  Examining the impact of ICT, human capital and carbon emissions: Evidence from the ASEAN economies , 2021 .

[63]  F. Ganda.  The Environmental Impacts of Human Capital in the BRICS Economies , 2021, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[64]  Hrushikesh Mallick,et al.  Do educational levels influence the environmental quality? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in selected BRICS countries with a new policy perspective , 2021 .

[65]  Emrah Koçak,et al.  The impact of immigration on human capital and carbon dioxide emissions in the USA: an empirical investigation , 2021, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[66]  Muhammad Imran Khan,et al.  Impact of foreign direct investment, natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS, developing, developed and global countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[67]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Asymmetric investigation to track the effect of urbanization, energy utilization, fossil fuel energy and CO2 emission on economic efficiency in China: another outlook , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[68]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[69]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents , 2020 .

[70]  Gulfer Vural.  How do output, trade, renewable energy and non-renewable energy impact carbon emissions in selected Sub-Saharan African Countries? , 2020 .

[71]  F. Bekun,et al.  Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. , 2020, Resources Policy.

[72]  S. Nathaniel.  Biocapacity, human capital, and ecological footprint in G7 countries: the moderating role of urbanization and necessary lessons for emerging economies , 2020, Energy, Ecology and Environment.

[73]  Anwar Khan,et al.  Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: A simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries , 2020 .

[74]  Muhammad Ali,et al.  CO 2 emission, economic development, fossil fuel consumption and population density in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: A panel investigation , 2020, International Journal of Finance & Economics.

[75]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[76]  Muhammad Umar,et al.  Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[77]  X. Vo,et al.  Globalization and carbon emissions: Is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[78]  Zahoor Ahmed,et al.  Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China , 2020, Resources Policy.

[79]  Mohammad Razib Hossain.  Can small-scale biogas projects mitigate the energy crisis of rural Bangladesh? A study with economic analysis , 2020 .

[80]  M. Younis,et al.  Impact of Urbanization and Economic Growth on CO2 Emission: A Case of Far East Asian Countries , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[81]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Industrial path analysis for CO2 transfers induced by final consumption: A comparison of the United States and China , 2020 .

[82]  Danish,et al.  Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization , 2020 .

[83]  M. Destek,et al.  Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[84]  M. Azam.  Relationship between energy, investment, human capital, environment, and economic growth in four BRICS countries , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[85]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States , 2019, Resources Policy.

[86]  S. Nathaniel,et al.  Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[87]  Xiaohang Ren,et al.  Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission - Evidence from the BRIICS. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[88]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? , 2018 .

[89]  S. Chaabouni,et al.  The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: A case study for 51 countries , 2017, Environmental research.

[90]  Bo Wang,et al.  Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: evidence from Pakistan , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[91]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy , 2016 .

[92]  Ivan A. Canay.  A Simple Approach to Quantile Regression for Panel Data , 2011 .

[93]  Andrew Williams.  Shining a Light on the Resource Curse: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Natural Resources, Transparency, and Economic Growth , 2011 .

[94]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data , 2008 .

[95]  R. Koenker.  Quantile regression for longitudinal data , 2004 .

[96]  P. Pedroni.  PANEL COINTEGRATION: ASYMPTOTIC AND FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF POOLED TIME SERIES TESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PPP HYPOTHESIS , 2004, Econometric Theory.

[97]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , 2003 .

[98]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[99]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[100]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels , 2001 .

[101]  G. Maddala,et al.  A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test , 1999 .

[102]  P. Pedroni.  Current Version : July 25 , 1999 CRITICAL VALUES FOR COINTEGRATION TESTS IN HETEROGENEOUS PANELS WITH MULTIPLE REGRESSORS * , 1999 .

[103]  C. Kao,et al.  On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data , 1997 .

[104]  Chihwa Kao,et al.  Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data When the Cross-Section and Time-Series Dimensions are Comparable , 1996 .

[105]  P. Phillips.  Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[106]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals: Monte Carlo Evidence , 1981 .