Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.

In 4 chronometric experiments, influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition were examined. Participants were shown pictures while hearing a tone or a spoken word presented shortly after picture onset. When a spoken word was presented, participants indicated whether it contained a prespecified phoneme. When the tone was presented, they indicated whether the picture name contained the phoneme (Experiment 1) or they named the picture (Experiment 2). Phoneme monitoring latencies for the spoken words were shorter when the picture name contained the prespecified phoneme compared with when it did not. Priming of phoneme monitoring was also obtained when the phoneme was part of spoken nonwords (Experiment 3). However, no priming of phoneme monitoring was obtained when the pictures required no response in the experiment, regardless of monitoring latency (Experiment 4). These results provide evidence that an internal phonological pathway runs from spoken word planning to speech recognition and that active phonological encoding is a precondition for engaging the pathway.

[1]  D. A. Allport,et al.  Language perception and production : relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing , 1987 .

[2]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[3]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[4]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[5]  Nadine Martin,et al.  The relationship of input and output phonological processing: An evaluation of models and evidence to support them , 2002 .

[6]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Cognition and Motor Processes , 1983 .

[7]  D. Allport,et al.  Speech Production and Comprehension: One Lexicon or Two? , 1984 .

[8]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[9]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[10]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Error Monitoring in Speech Production: A Computational Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention and Gaze Control in Picture Naming, Word Reading, and Word Categorizing. , 2007 .

[12]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[13]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  T. Shallice,et al.  Isolating Cognitive Modules with the Dual-Task Paradigm: Are Speech Perception and Production Separate Processes? , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech , 2007, Cognition.

[17]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[18]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Modulation of cerebral blood-flow in the human auditory cortex during speech: role of motor-to-sensory discharges , 1996, NeuroImage.

[19]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). , 2004, Psychological review.

[20]  G. Altmann.  Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding , 1995 .

[22]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[23]  R J Wise,et al.  Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Insights into Working Memory from the Perspective of the EPIC Architecture for Modeling Skilled Perceptual-Motor and Cognitive Human Performance , 1998 .

[25]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[26]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Modeling the relation between the production and recognition of spoken word forms , 2003 .

[27]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[29]  P C Gordon,et al.  Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production , 2001 .

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[33]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[35]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Breaking the mirror: Asymmetrical disconnection between the phonological input and output codes , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[36]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring , 1996, NeuroImage.

[39]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[40]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[42]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[44]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[45]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[46]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[47]  浜中 淑彦.  Carl Wernicke;Der aphasische Symptomencomplex--Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis(「失語症候群--解剖学的基礎に立つ心理学的研究」,Max Cohn & Weigert,Breslau,1874) , 1975 .

[48]  S. Gathercole.  Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Independence of Input and Output Phonology in Word Processing and Short-Term Memory , 1999 .

[50]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Speech errors and the phonological similarity effect in short-term memory: Evidence suggesting a common locus , 2007 .

[51]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[52]  C. Wernicke.  Der aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis , 1874 .

[53]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.11 What , 2022 .

[55]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[56]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  On appropriate procedures for combining probability distributions within the same family , 1980 .

[58]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[59]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[60]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech , 2002 .

[61]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[62]  D. Howard,et al.  Phonological Errors in Aphasic Naming: Comprehension, Monitoring and Lexicality , 1995, Cortex.

[63]  R. Gnanadesikan,et al.  Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. , 1968, Biometrika.