The bizarre bazaar: FabLabs as hybrid hubs

Abstract In this paper, we consider the FabLab as an experimental facility for research, intervention and learning. By providing a space that affords close proximity between users, producers, technologies and materials, the FabLab affords a ‘hybrid hub’ for weaving relations between these. Borrowing the metaphor of ‘the bazaar’, we argue that FabLabs, due to their open and nonregulated character, can be seen as offering what we call a ‘bizarre bazaar’ for exchange, fabrication and knowledge creation. Based on the background of our own experiences with establishing and running FabLab RUC as an experimental learning, innovation and research environment, we discuss how ‘working through materials’ enables new forms of learning and research. We do this firstly by considering lab-based learning in design in general, and design and anthropological theory around ‘Making’ in particular. We then, secondly, move on to consider three cases for knowledge creation in a Fablab context, drawn from current work at FabLab RUC and demonstrating what we see as key potentials. Finally, and thirdly, we conclude emphasising in particular the role of proximity between researchers, students and professionals in art, technology and entrepreneurship.

[1]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Michael Knoll,et al.  The Project Method: Its Vocational Education Origin and International Development. , 1997 .

[3]  Pelle Ehn.  Manifesto for a digital bauhaus , 1998, Digit. Creativity.

[4]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[5]  P. Salus.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[6]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop--from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication , 2005 .

[7]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[8]  Thomas Binder,et al.  The Design:Lab as platform in participatory design research , 2008 .

[9]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Bringing Things Back to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials , 2010 .

[10]  David Gauntlett,et al.  Making is connecting: the social meaning of creativity from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0 , 2011 .

[11]  Julia Walter-Herrmann.  FABLABS – A GLOBAL SOCIAL MOVEMENT? , 2013 .

[12]  Heidi Schelhowe,et al.  DIGITAL REALITIES, PHYSICAL ACTION AND DEEP LEARNING FABLABS AS EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS? , 2013 .

[13]  Corinne Büching,et al.  FabLab: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors , 2013 .

[14]  THOUGHTS FROM THE ROAD OF A FABLAB NOMAD , 2013 .

[15]  T. Ingold,et al.  From Description to Correspondence: Anthropology in Real Time , 2020, Design Anthropology.

[16]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[17]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Situated Design Methods , 2014 .

[18]  Steven Shaviro.  The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism , 2014 .

[19]  Elisabet M. Nilsson,et al.  Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy , 2014 .

[20]  Mads Hobye,et al.  Empowering academia through modern fabrication practices , 2014 .

[21]  Michael Haldrup,et al.  The Bachelor Programmes and the Roskilde Model , 2015 .

[22]  J. Thiel.  Vibrant Matter , 2015 .

[23]  N. Padfield,et al.  Remix utopia: Eleven propositions on design and social fantasy , 2015, Nordic Design Research Conference.

[24]  Simon Heilesen,et al.  The Roskilde Model: Problem-Oriented Learning and Project Work , 2015 .

[25]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  On the significance of making in interaction design research , 2016, Interactions.