Developing Students' Metacognitive Awareness in Asynchronous Learning Networks in Comparison to Face-to-Face Discussion Groups

The main goal of the present study is to investigate empirically the effects of Asynchronic Learning Network (ALN) embedded within metacognitive instruction (META) on two components of metacognitive awareness: Knowledge about Cognition (KC) and Regulation of Cognition (RC). Participants were 202 tenth grade students: 102 students who studied under the ALN+META instructional method, and 100 students who studied under Face-to-Face interaction (F2F) embedded within META. Results indicated that ALN+META students significantly outperformed their F2F+META counterparts on both KC and RC. These results were strengthened by a qualitative analysis of RC under the different instructional methods. The improvement of RC behavior in the ALN+META written discourse clearly indicates the crucial effects of RC on the progress and success of the inquiry processes. ALN+META is a promising learning environment, carrying a great potential for enhancing metacognitive awareness among students.

[1]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  Improve: A Multidimensional Method For Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms , 1997 .

[2]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[3]  M. Birenbaum,et al.  Reflective Active Learning in a Graduate Course on Assessment , 1999 .

[4]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Preferences toward Internet-based Learning Environments: High School Students\u2019 Perspectives for Science Learning , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  METACOGNITION AND IT: THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-AWARENESS , 2002 .

[6]  R. Slavin.  Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .

[7]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Vincent N. Lunetta.  The School Science Laboratory: Historical Perspectives and Contexts for Contemporary Teaching , 1998 .

[9]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  Mirror, mirror, on my screen≡ Exploring online reflections , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2003 .

[11]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. , 1988 .

[12]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology , 2000 .

[13]  R. Azevedo.  Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[14]  J. Flavell.  Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[15]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks , 2002 .

[16]  Alla Keselman.  Supporting Inquiry Learning by Promoting Normative Understanding of Multivariable Causality. , 2003 .

[17]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Current Realities and Future Possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction , 2006 .

[18]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Assessing metacognitive awareness , 1994 .

[19]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[20]  P. Alexander,et al.  Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions , 1989 .

[21]  V. Anfara,et al.  Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public , 2002 .

[22]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence , 2001 .

[23]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  The effects of metacognitive instruction embedded within an asynchronous learning network on scientific inquiry skills , 2005 .

[24]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[25]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[26]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training , 2003 .

[27]  Petros Georghiades,et al.  From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition , 2004 .

[28]  A. Brown.  Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[29]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Teachers implementing writing-to-learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study , 2002 .

[30]  Joseph J. Schwab.  Biology teachers' handbook , 1963 .

[31]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Evaluating the Extent of Ill-Structured Problem Solving Process among Pre-Service Teachers in an Asynchronous Online Discussion and Reflection Log Learning Environment , 2004 .

[32]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Authentic school science : knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories , 1995 .

[33]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[34]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding , 2005 .

[35]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction , 1987 .

[36]  B. Nonnecke,et al.  WHY LURKERS LURK , 2001 .

[37]  Jane Kenway,et al.  Gender and Science Education in Schools: A Review ‘with Attitude’ , 1998 .

[38]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[39]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .