An integrated model-based approach for real-time on-line diagnosis of complex systems

Abstract Model-based diagnostic programs have been shown to be useful in isolating unpredictable faults in various types of systems. Due to the complex nature of many of these systems, models used by these programs to represent monitored systems have traditionally imposed restrictions on domain representations. These restrictions can make it difficult (and often impossible) to model a domain whose behavior is global in nature. By global, is meant behavior that affects system variables in parts of the system not directly related to the component in question. Analog electrical circuits and hydraulic circuits are only a few examples of such global systems. Accurate modelling of the behavior of these global systems is very often essential for obtaining a correct diagnosis. In complex systems such as those typically found in the electrical power-distribution domain, global behavior can be observed when voltages and currents throughout an entire system are affected by local load fluctuations, transient disturbances, faults, or circuit re-configurations, even when these are in remote parts of the circuit. Traditional models used in diagnosis have not been able to easily reflect these global interactions, and as a result, monitoring and diagnostic capabilities of model-based systems dependent upon such models are significantly degraded. This paper presents an implementation that can correctly simulate power systems and other such complex systems by overcoming the problem of representing global behavior while preserving the diagnostic abilities of structure–function models in model-based reasoning methodologies. This paper describes the integration of robust models , within the conventional device-centered models. These robust models are mathematically accurate system models, normally used in quantitative simulation for the purpose of system analysis. If used within the conventional device-centered models, they can provide the functionality needed in a structure–function model-based diagnostic paradigm, and therefore eliminate the problem of representing global behaviors in diagnosis. This paper further describes a conflict-oriented diagnostic technique used in conjunction with robust models to obtain real-time on-line FDIR (Fault Diagnosis, Isolation, and Recovery).

[1]  Kamal N. Karna Expert Systems in Government Symposium , 1985 .

[2]  C. Myers,et al.  Intelligent space power automation , 1989, Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control 1989.

[3]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  Model-Based, Multiple-Fault Diagnosis of Dynamic, Continuous Physical Devices , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[4]  J. White,et al.  Generator Expert Monitoring System , 1989 .

[5]  D P Möller [A diagnostic expert system]. , 1990, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[6]  Avelino J. Gonzalez,et al.  On-Line Diagnosis of Turbine-Generators using Artificial Intelligence , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  Arthur N. Blasdel Automated Fault Handling of a Satellite Electrical Power Subsystem Using a Model-Based Expert System , 1987 .

[8]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  A structural and behavioral reasoning system for diagnosing large-scale systems , 1993, IEEE Expert.

[9]  B. Don Russell,et al.  Expert system structures for fault detection in spaceborne power systems , 1988 .

[10]  David J. Weeks,et al.  The autonomously managed power systems laboratory , 1988 .

[11]  Frederic D. McKenzie,et al.  Model-based, real-time control of electrical power systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  P. A. Swaby,et al.  VIDES: an expert system for visually identifying microfossils , 1992, IEEE Expert.

[13]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Model-based diagnosis of power-station control systems , 1992, IEEE Expert.

[14]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Model-based reasoning for fault diagnosis , 1987 .

[15]  Randall Davis,et al.  Issues in Model Based Troubleshooting , 1987 .

[16]  B. R. Ashworth An architecture for automated fault diagnosis (of space power systems) , 1989, Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[17]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Qualitative physics: towards the automation of systems problem solving , 1991, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Randall Davis,et al.  Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Structure and Behavior , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Bernard Pagurek,et al.  Simulation (model) based fault detection and diagnosis of a spacecraft electrical power system , 1993, Proceedings of 9th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications.

[20]  Gabor Karsai,et al.  Real-time fault diagnostics , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[21]  Joel Riedesel,et al.  A survey of fault diagnosis technology , 1989 .

[22]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  Characterizing Diagnoses and Systems , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Amy Stephan,et al.  Modeling Power Systems for Diagnosis: How Good is Good Enough? , 1992 .

[24]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Process monitoring and diagnosis: a model-based approach , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[25]  Mikito Iwamasa,et al.  A Pilot System for Plant Control Using Model-Based Reasoning , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[26]  Goran Lars Pettersson Impedance-driven model-based diagnosis of electric power distribution system faults , 1995 .

[27]  John Douglass Hodjat Whitehead Fault diagnosis based on causal reasoning , 1987 .

[28]  R.J. Spier,et al.  Real-time expert systems for advanced power control (a status update) , 1989, Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.

[29]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles , 1986, Artif. Intell..