Cost-effectiveness of treating hyperlipidemia in the presence of diabetes : who should be treated?

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to estimate the long-term costs and benefits of treating hyperlipidemia among diabetic patients with and without known cardiovascular disease after validating the Cardiovascular Life Expectancy Model. METHODS AND RESULTS The model estimates were compared with the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and used to estimate the long-term costs and benefits of treatment with simvastatin. Simulations were performed for men and women, 40 to 70 years of age, having pretreatment LDL cholesterol values of 5.46, 4.34, and 3.85 mmol/L (211, 168, and 149 mg/dL). We forecasted the long-term risk of cardiovascular events, the need for medical and surgical interventions, and the associated costs in 1996 US dollars. The model validated well against the observed results of the of the 4S diabetic patients. In this validation, the model estimates fell within the 95% confidence interval of the observed results for 7 of the 8 available end points (coronary deaths, total deaths, and so forth). Treatment with simvastatin for patients with cardiovascular disease is cost-effective for men and women, with or without diabetes. Among diabetic individuals without cardiovascular disease, the benefits of primary prevention were also substantial and the cost-effectiveness ratios attractive across a wide range of assumptions ( approximately $4000 to $40 000 per year of life saved). These conclusions were robust even among diabetics with lower baseline LDL values and smaller LDL reductions as observed in the Cholesterol and Recruitment Events (CARE) trial. CONCLUSIONS Among adults with hyperlipidemia, the presence of diabetes identifies men and women among whom lipid therapy is likely to be effective and cost-effective even in the absence of other risk factors or known cardiovascular disease.

[1]  L. Coupal,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: forecasting the incremental benefits of preventing coronary and cerebrovascular events. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  A. Gotto,et al.  Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  L. Coupal,et al.  Estimating the benefits of modifying risk factors of cardiovascular disease: a comparison of primary vs secondary prevention. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  S. Haffner Management of Dyslipidemia in Adults With Diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[6]  S. Haffner Management of Dyslipidemia in Adults With Diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[7]  W. Manning,et al.  Starting insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: effectiveness, complications, and resource utilization. , 1997, JAMA.

[8]  A. Zbrozek,et al.  Model of Complications of NIDDM: II. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Terje R Pedersen,et al.  Cholesterol Lowering With Simvastatin Improves Prognosis of Diabetic Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[10]  M. Gold,et al.  Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. , 1996, Medical care.

[11]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  B. Davis,et al.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Cholesterol lowering and the use of healthcare resources. Results of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. , 1996, Circulation.

[14]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Task force 6: cost effectiveness of assessment and management of risk factors , 1996 .

[15]  V. Fuster,et al.  27th Bethesda Conference: matching the intensity of risk factor management with the hazard for coronary disease events. Task Force 1. Pathogenesis of coronary disease: the biologic role of risk factors. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia , 1995 .

[17]  C. Furberg,et al.  Reduction in cardiovascular events during pravastatin therapy. Pooled analysis of clinical events of the Pravastatin Atherosclerosis Intervention Program. , 1995, Circulation.

[18]  Resource Utilization and Costs of Care in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[19]  Toni Martin,et al.  Physician and Patient Prevention Practices in NIDDM in a Large Urban Managed-Care Organization , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[20]  Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1994, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Stengård,et al.  Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase as predictors of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before clinical onset of disease , 1994, The Lancet.

[22]  L. Coupal,et al.  Serum lipid screening to identify high-risk individuals for coronary death. The results of the Lipid Research Clinics prevalence cohort. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II) , 1993, JAMA.

[24]  J. Huttunen,et al.  Coronary Heart Disease Incidence in NIDDM Patients In The Helsinki Heart Study , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[25]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 1991, JAMA.

[26]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. , 1991, Stroke.

[27]  Mckendry Jb Direct costs of diabetes care: a survey in Ottawa, Ontario 1986. , 1989 .

[28]  Roger A. Renfrew,et al.  Lipid Research Clinics Program. , 1984, JAMA.

[29]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Lipoprotein‐Cholesterol Distributions in Selected North American Populations: The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study , 1980, Circulation.

[30]  L. Wilkins Plasma Lipid Distributions in Selected North American Populations: The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study THE LIPID RESEARCH CLINICS PROGRAM EPIDEMIOLOGY COMMITTEE , 1979, Circulation.

[31]  P. Renshaw,et al.  [Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults]. , 2001, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[32]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[33]  Teven,et al.  MORTALITY FROM CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND IN NONDIABETIC SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT PRIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 2000 .

[34]  Ames,et al.  PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE WITH PRAVASTATIN IN MEN WITH HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA , 2000 .

[35]  M. A. J. Ohannesson,et al.  COST EFFECTIVENESS OF SIMVASTATIN TREATMENT TO LOWER CHOLESTEROL LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE , 1997 .

[36]  J. McKendry Direct costs of diabetes care: a survey in Ottawa, Ontario 1986. , 1989, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.