Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system

High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30‐marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2‐week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay‐specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter‐site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping.

[1]  O. Ornatsky,et al.  A robust human immunophenotyping workflow using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis software , 2019, The Journal of Immunology.

[2]  O. Ornatsky,et al.  An efficient human whole blood workflow using CyTOF technology: a lyophilized 30-plex antibody panel coupled with automated data analysis , 2018, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  Lisa E. Wagar,et al.  Comparison of CyTOF assays across sites: Results of a six-center pilot study , 2017, Journal of immunological methods.

[4]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Multicenter Systems Analysis of Human Blood Reveals Immature Neutrophils in Males and During Pregnancy , 2017, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  Adeeb H. Rahman,et al.  Heparin reduces nonspecific eosinophil staining artifacts in mass cytometry experiments , 2016, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[6]  J. P. McCoy,et al.  Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  C. Bruce Bagwell,et al.  Automated analysis of flow cytometric data for measuring neutrophil CD64 expression using a multi‐instrument compatible probability state model , 2015, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[8]  C Bruce Bagwell,et al.  Probability state modeling theory , 2015, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[9]  V. Maino,et al.  Probability state modeling of memory CD8⁺ T-cell differentiation. , 2013, Journal of immunological methods.

[10]  B H Davis,et al.  Automated quantitation of fetomaternal hemorrhage by flow cytometry for HbF‐containing fetal red blood cells using probability state modeling , 2013, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[11]  G. Borsellino,et al.  Mononuclear phagocytes and marker modulation: when CD16 disappears, CD38 takes the stage. , 2013, Blood.

[12]  C Bruce Bagwell,et al.  Automated analysis of GPI‐deficient leukocyte flow cytometric data using GemStone™ , 2012, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[13]  D. Herbert,et al.  Automated analysis of flow cytometric data for CD34+ stem cell enumeration using a probability state model , 2012, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[14]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[15]  C. Bruce Bagwell,et al.  Probability State Modeling: A New Paradigm for Cytometric Analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Learning a Parametric Embedding by Preserving Local Structure , 2009, AISTATS.

[17]  O. Ornatsky,et al.  Study of cell antigens and intracellular DNA by identification of element-containing labels and metallointercalators using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Similarities and differences in CD4+ and CD8+ effector and memory T cell generation , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[19]  C. B. Bagwell Chapter 2 High-Dimensional Modeling for Cytometry : Building Rock Solid Models Using GemStone TM and Verity Cen-se ’ TM High-Definition t-SNE Mapping , 2018 .

[20]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Jüri Lember,et al.  Bridging Viterbi and posterior decoding: a generalized risk approach to hidden path inference based on hidden Markov models , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .