Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

UNLABELLED Perceptual disturbances and motion sickness are often attributed to sensory conflict. We investigated several conditions: head movements in microgravity, periodic motions in 1-g, and locomotion with vestibular disorders. In every case, linear vectors such as linear and gravitational acceleration are crucial factors, as previously found for head movements in artificial gravity, and thus the importance of measuring linear vectors emerges as a common theme. By modeling the sensory conflict between the vestibular and somatosensory systems, we computed a measure of linear conflict known as the "Stretch Factor". We hypothesized that the motions with the greatest Stretch Factor would be the most provocative motions. RESULTS For head movements in microgravity, the Stretch Factor can explain why fast movements are more provocative than slow movements, and why pitch movements are more provocative than yaw movements. For off-vertical-axis rotation (OVAR) in 1-g, the Stretch Factor predicts that the most provocative frequency is higher than that for vertical linear oscillation (VLO). For example, the same sensor dynamics can predict a most provocative frequency around 0.2 Hz for VLO but 0.3 Hz for OVAR, solving a mystery of this experimentally observed discrepancy. Finally, we determined that certain sensory conflict perceptions reported by vestibular patients could be explained via mathematical simulation.

[1]  S. J. Alexander,et al.  Wesleyan University Studies of Motion Sickness: I. The Effects of Variation of Time Intervals Between Accelerations Upon Sickness Rates , 1945 .

[2]  Groen Jj.  The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals. , 1961 .

[3]  A. R. Muir,et al.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Knibestöl,et al.  Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. , 1970, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  M. Knibestöl.  Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Perception of Body Position and Susceptibility of Motion Sickness as Functions of Angle of Tilt and Angular Velocity in Off-Vertical Rotation, , 1973 .

[7]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency and acceleration of vertical sinusoidal motion. , 1973, Aerospace medicine.

[8]  F. Guedry.  Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[9]  R. Mayne,et al.  A Systems Concept of the Vestibular Organs , 1974 .

[10]  A Graybiel,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness among six Skylab astronauts. , 1975, Acta astronautica.

[11]  M. Knibestöl.  Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Michael E. McCauley,et al.  MOTION SICKNESS INCIDENCE: EXPLORATORY STUDIES OF HABITUATION, PITCH AND ROLL, AND THE REFINEMENT OF A MATHEMATICAL MODEL , 1976 .

[13]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  L. Young,et al.  Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli , 1977 .

[16]  F. Guedry,et al.  Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not? , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  C. Oman.  A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. , 1982, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[18]  E I Matsnev,et al.  Space motion sickness: phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  J R Lackner,et al.  The effective intensity of Coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation is gravitoinertial force dependent: implications for space motion sickness. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[20]  J R Lackner,et al.  Head movements in low and high gravitoinertial force environments elicit motion sickness: implications for space motion sickness. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  Optimal Estimator Model for Human Spatial Orientation a , 1988 .

[22]  C. Oman,et al.  Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. , 1990, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[23]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Two-dimensional spatiotemporal coding of linear acceleration in vestibular nuclei neurons , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[25]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[26]  C. Darlot,et al.  Motion sickness during off-vertical axis rotation: prediction by a model of sensory interactions and correlation with other forms of motion sickness , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  W. Bles,et al.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[28]  K. Funabiki,et al.  Vestibulo-ocular reflex in patients with Meniere's disease between attacks. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Michael Fetter,et al.  Three-dimensional eye-movement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  D E Angelaki,et al.  Spatiotemporal processing of linear acceleration: primary afferent and central vestibular neuron responses. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  Theoretical considerations on canal–otolith interaction and an observer model , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Dominik Straumann,et al.  Eye movements during multi-axis whole-body rotations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  C. Oman,et al.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Spatio-temporal convergence (STC) in otolith neurons , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion , 2004, Nature.

[40]  J. Droulez,et al.  Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Jan E Holly,et al.  Vestibular coriolis effect differences modeled with three-dimensional linear-angular interactions. , 2004, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[42]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration. , 2005, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[43]  Gin McCollum,et al.  Head tilt–translation combinations distinguished at the level of neurons , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[44]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Jean Laurens,et al.  Bayesian processing of vestibular information , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[46]  M. Reschke,et al.  Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  J. Holly,et al.  Effect of radius versus rotation speed in artificial gravity. , 2008, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[48]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Scott J. Wood,et al.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[50]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  S. Cass,et al.  Vestibular Disorders: A Case Study Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment , 2010 .

[52]  Arun P Sripati,et al.  Predicting the timing of spikes evoked by tactile stimulation of the hand. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  J. Bergenius,et al.  Different types of dizziness in patients with peripheral vestibular diseases – their prevalence and relation to migraine , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.