Linguistic diversity of the Americas can be reconciled with a recent colonization.

The Americas harbor a very great diversity of indigenous language stocks, many more than are found in any other continent. J. Nichols [(1990) Language 66, 475-521] has argued that this diversity indicates a great time depth of in situ evolution. She thus infers that the colonization of the Americas must have begun around 35,000 years ago. This estimate is much earlier than the date for which there is strong archaeological support, which does not much exceed 12,000 years. Nichols' assumption is that the diversity of linguistic stocks increases linearly with time. This paper compares the major continents of the world to show that this assumption is not correct. In fact, stock diversity is highest in the Americas, which are by consensus the youngest continents, intermediate in Australia and New Guinea, and lowest in Africa and Eurasia where the time depth is greatest. If anything, then, after an initial radiation, stock diversity decreases with time. A simple model is outlined that predicts these dynamics. It assumes that early in the peopling of continents, there are many unfilled niches for communities to live in, and so fissioning into new lineages is frequent. As the habitat is filled up, the rate of fissioning declines and lineage extinction becomes the dominant evolutionary force.

[1]  R. M. Meyer.  Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies , 2000 .

[2]  T. Sluckin,et al.  Modelling Paleoindian dispersals , 1998 .

[3]  Glascock,et al.  Quebrada jaguay: early south american maritime adaptations , 1998, Science.

[4]  M. Stoneking,et al.  mtDNA analysis of a prehistoric Oneota population: implications for the peopling of the New World. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  A. Gibbons.  Mother Tongues Trace Steps of Earliest Americans , 1998, Science.

[6]  R. Dixon.  The rise and fall of languages , 1997 .

[7]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  Guns, germs and steel : how the inequalities of wealth and power among modern peoples were moulded by prehistory , 1997 .

[8]  A. Fattaey,et al.  An Adenovirus Mutant That Replicates Selectively in p53- Deficient Human Tumor Cells , 1996, Science.

[9]  B. Chernoff,et al.  Paleoindian Cave Dwellers in the Amazon: The Peopling of the Americas , 1996, Science.

[10]  M. Pagel,et al.  A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  P. Richerson,et al.  Can Group-Functional Behaviors Evolve by Cultural Group Selection?: An Empirical Test , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[12]  D. J. Meltzer,et al.  Clocking the First Americans , 1995 .

[13]  R. Barrantes,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA "clock" for the Amerinds and its implications for timing their entry into North America. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Dorn,et al.  New Perspectives on the Clovis vs. Pre-Clovis Controversy , 1993, American Antiquity.

[15]  J V Neel,et al.  Asian affinities and continental radiation of the four founding Native American mtDNAs. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  R. Sukernik,et al.  mtDNA variation of aboriginal Siberians reveals distinct genetic affinities with Native Americans. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  A. Gibbons.  Geneticists trace the DNA trail of the first Americans. , 1993, Science.

[18]  T. Goebel,et al.  The Colonization of Beringia and the Peopling of the New World , 1993, Science.

[19]  J. Nichols.  Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time , 1992 .

[20]  T. Dillehay,et al.  Earliest hunters and gatherers of South America , 1992 .

[21]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Extensive mitochondrial diversity within a single Amerindian tribe. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  C. Renfrew.  Before Babel: Speculations on the Origins of Linguistic Diversity , 1991, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[23]  T. Dillehay,et al.  Monte Verde: A Late Pleistocene Settlement in Chile. , 1991 .

[24]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  AND THE FIRST SETTLEMENT OF THE NEW WORLD , 1990 .

[25]  Rhys Jones,et al.  Thermoluminescence dating of a 50,000-year-old human occupation site in northern Australia , 1990, Nature.

[26]  A. Kehoe.  Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins , 1989, American Antiquity.

[27]  J. Hoffecker,et al.  Late Pleistocene Settlement in the Nenana Valley, Central Alaska , 1989, American Antiquity.

[28]  M. Nei,et al.  Relationships between gene trees and species trees. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  Allen Johnson,et al.  The evolution of human societies : from foraging group to agrarian state , 1988 .

[30]  R. Gruhn.  Linguistic Evidence in Support of the Coastal Route of Earliest Entry Into the New World , 1988 .

[31]  Mark Nathan Cohen,et al.  The Food Crisis in Prehistory , 1977 .

[32]  Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Population Model for the Diffusion of Early Farming in Europe. In the Explanation of Culture Change; Models In Prehistory , 1973 .

[33]  Michael Walker,et al.  The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory ed. by Colin Renfrew (review) , 2023 .

[34]  C. Haynes,et al.  The earliest americans. , 1969, Science.

[35]  E. Haury,et al.  The Lehner Mammoth Site, Southeastern Arizona , 1959, American Antiquity.