Little samplers, big fleet: eDNA metabarcoding from commercial trawlers enhances ocean monitoring

[1]  H. Reveron,et al.  Passive sampling of environmental DNA in aquatic environments using 3D-printed hydroxyapatite samplers , 2021, bioRxiv.

[2]  O. Rickards,et al.  Ancient genomes from a rural site in Imperial Rome (1st–3rd cent. CE): a genetic junction in the Roman Empire , 2021, Annals of human biology.

[3]  J. Adolf,et al.  Trawl and eDNA assessment of marine fish diversity, seasonality, and relative abundance in coastal New Jersey, USA  , 2021 .

[4]  S. Mariani,et al.  Shark and ray diversity, abundance and temporal variation around an Indian Ocean Island, inferred by eDNA metabarcoding , 2021, Conservation Science and Practice.

[5]  Bessey Cindy,et al.  Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. , 2021, Communications biology.

[6]  J. Ellis,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals estuarine benthic community response to nutrient enrichment - Evidence from an in-situ experiment. , 2020, Environmental pollution.

[7]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Remote, autonomous real-time monitoring of environmental DNA from commercial fish , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[8]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Environmental DNA detection tracks established seasonal occurrence of blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) in a semi-enclosed subtropical bay , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  S. Mariani,et al.  All is fish that comes to the net: metabarcoding for rapid fisheries catch assessment , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Environmental DNA from plastic and textile marine litter detects exotic and nuisance species nearby ports , 2020, PloS one.

[11]  Antonio A. Alonso,et al.  Use of computer vision onboard fishing vessels to quantify catches: The iObserver , 2020, Marine Policy.

[12]  E. Harvey,et al.  eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine‐scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[13]  T. Frøslev,et al.  Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  K. Crandall,et al.  Environmental DNA survey captures patterns of fish and invertebrate diversity across a tropical seascape , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  D. Sims,et al.  Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[16]  S. Franceschini,et al.  Simulating the Effects of Alternative Management Measures of Trawl Fisheries in the Central Mediterranean Sea: Application of a Multi-Species Bio-economic Modeling Approach , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[17]  C. Greene,et al.  Environmental DNA provides quantitative estimates of a threatened salmon species , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[18]  C. Ulrich,et al.  More data for the money: Improvements in design and cost efficiency of electronic monitoring in the Danish cod catch quota management trial , 2019, Fisheries Research.

[19]  S. Mariani,et al.  Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers , 2019, Current Biology.

[20]  Matt Merrifield,et al.  Opportunities to improve fisheries management through innovative technology and advanced data systems , 2019, Fish and Fisheries.

[21]  Alexander M. Weigand,et al.  DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work , 2019, bioRxiv.

[22]  O. R. Eigaard,et al.  Bottom trawl fishing footprints on the world’s continental shelves , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 , 2018, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture.

[24]  Stefano Cataudella,et al.  A model combining landings and VMS data to estimate landings by fishing ground and harbor , 2018 .

[25]  Antton Alberdi,et al.  Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples , 2018 .

[26]  D. Relman,et al.  Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data , 2017, bioRxiv.

[27]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[28]  J. Robidart,et al.  Molecular-biological sensing in aquatic environments: recent developments and emerging capabilities. , 2017, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[29]  P. Taberlet,et al.  obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[30]  T. Rognes,et al.  Swarm v2: highly-scalable and high-resolution amplicon clustering , 2015, PeerJ.

[31]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[32]  L. Weyrich,et al.  Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[33]  A. Rijnsdorp,et al.  When does fishing lead to more fish? Community consequences of bottom trawl fisheries in demersal food webs , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Iraad F Bronner,et al.  Improved Protocols for Illumina Sequencing. , 2013, Current protocols in human genetics.

[35]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[36]  Jan Sauer,et al.  Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change , 2011 .

[37]  Rob Knight,et al.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection , 2011, Bioinform..

[38]  Hanbo Chen,et al.  VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[39]  Mark George Thomas,et al.  Ancient DNA Reveals Lack of Continuity between Neolithic Hunter-Gatherers and Contemporary Scandinavians , 2009, Current Biology.

[40]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2 , 2013, R J..