Assessment of the effect of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS‐based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation

It is a common technique to predict hydrologic effects of land use changes by simulation models. On the scale of watersheds, hydrologic models comprise different approaches for many hydrologic components. One important source of model uncertainty results from errors of measured input data and their spatial aggregation. Whereas simulations on the basis of measured land use can be validated by measuring resulting hydrologic components, model uncertainty on land use scenarios cannot be quantified because of their virtuality. An entropy-based algorithm is proposed and validated, which should serve for the identification of an appropriate level of spatial aggregation. This technique is statistically based and applicable for common methods of subwatershed and hydrologic response unit (HRU) delineation. The main criterion of this algorithm is the heterogeneity of data distribution within the investigated watershed, which might vary for different land use scenarios. For spatial output analysis of a long-term hydrologic model, a reassignment technique of statistically distributed output values to certain grids was developed. It combines efficient model calculations for aggregated spatial areas without losing spatial output heterogeneity. This procedure enables model validation on a grid-based resolution and serves for the identification of spatial differences of uncertainty. Besides these new approaches for spatial analysis, different common tools for data pre- and post-processing were integrated into the comprising software package IOSWAT, linked to a GIS. The results of the new approaches prove them to be valid for different watersheds and hydrologic conditions. The application of the comprehensive software package is presented in Fohrer et al. (this issue). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[2]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SUBWATERSHED SPATIAL ANALYSIS TOOL: DISCRETIZATION OF A DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODEL BY STATISTICAL CRITERIA 1 , 2002 .

[3]  L. Martz,et al.  The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models , 1998 .

[4]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments , 2002 .

[5]  V. Krysanova,et al.  Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds , 1998 .

[6]  M. Kavvas On the coarse-graining of hydrologic processes with increasing scales , 1999 .

[7]  H. Rohdenburg Methods for the analysis of agro-ecosystems in central Europe, with emphasis on geoecological aspects , 1989 .

[8]  S. Leigh,et al.  Probability and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering , 1989 .

[9]  K. Eckhardt,et al.  Hydrologic Response to land use changes on the catchment scale , 2001 .

[10]  Wolfgang-Albert Flügel,et al.  Delineating hydrological response units by geographical information system analyses for regional hydrological modelling using PRMS/MMS in the drainage basin of the River Bröl, Germany , 1995 .

[11]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield , 1997 .

[12]  A. Becker,et al.  Disaggregation, aggregation and spatial scaling in hydrological modelling , 1999 .

[13]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF A BASIN‐SCALE WATER QUALITY MODEL WITH GIS , 1994 .

[14]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale and scaling in hydrology , 2004 .

[15]  D. Mackay,et al.  Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model , 2000 .

[16]  M. Costa-Cabral,et al.  Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON): A model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas , 1994 .

[17]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .