Techno-economic performance evaluation of a direct biomass-fired combined cycle plant employing air turbine

Techno-economic performance analysis of a biomass-fired combined cycle plant, employing a topping air turbine (AT) cycle and a bottoming steam turbine cycle, is reported in this paper. The net power output is 500 kWe, the AT producing 350 kWe and the ST producing the rest. Biomass (saw dust) is directly fired in a biomass combustor-heat exchanger (BCHX) duplex unit which supplies heat to the topping cycle. Influences of major plant parameters on the thermo-economic performance of the plant are analysed. Overall efficiency is found to maximise at topping cycle pressure ratio of 4. Higher TIT results in better energetic performance, while higher hot end temperature difference of the BCHX unit lowers the plant efficiency. Thermo-economic analysis reveals that the lowest unit cost of electricity (UCOE) of about 0.12 $/kWh could be achieved for the plant, while still giving an overall efficiency of about 48 %. Based on minimum UCOE, the payback period is estimated to be about 6 years with 50 % capital subsidy and about 13 years with no capital subsidy.

[1]  Martin Kautz,et al.  The externally-fired gas-turbine (EFGT-Cycle) for decentralized use of biomass , 2007 .

[2]  Hanif A. Choudhury,et al.  Bioenergy from rice crop residues: role in developing economies , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsakomakas,et al.  An economic comparison assessment of lignite and biomass IGCC power plants , 2012 .

[4]  Francisco Jurado,et al.  Study of a downdraft gasifier and externally fired gas turbine for olive industry wastes , 2011 .

[5]  Tetsuo Fuchino,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis for the optimal conceptual design of biomass gasification energy conversion systems , 2009 .

[6]  S. C. Mullick,et al.  Biomass gasifier projects for decentralized power supply in India: A financial evaluation , 2007 .

[7]  R. Ganguly,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation , 2010 .

[8]  R. G. Tated,et al.  Simulation of biomass gasification in downdraft gasifier for different biomass fuels using ASPEN PLUS , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[9]  Tara C. Kandpal,et al.  A financial evaluation of biomass-gasifier-based power generation in India , 1997 .

[10]  Zainal Alimuddin Zainal,et al.  Turbine startup methods for externally fired micro gas turbine (EFMGT) system using biomass fuels , 2010 .

[11]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale , 2003 .

[12]  Kuntal Jana,et al.  Polygeneration performance assessments: multi-dimensional viewpoint , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[13]  Pradip Mondal,et al.  Thermodynamic Performance Assessment of a Bio-gasification Based Small-scale Combined Cogeneration Plant Employing Indirectly Heated Gas Turbine , 2015 .

[14]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Thermo-economic assessment of externally fired micro-gas turbine fired by natural gas and biomass: applications in Italy. , 2013 .

[15]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant , 2014 .

[16]  Pinakeswar Mahanta,et al.  Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective , 2010 .

[17]  Francisco Jurado,et al.  Comparison between externally fired gas turbine and gasifier-gas turbine system for the olive oil industry , 2011 .

[18]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants. , 2013 .

[19]  Bernardo Fortunato,et al.  Cycle configuration analysis and techno-economic sensitivity of biomass externally fired gas turbine with bottoming ORC , 2015 .

[20]  A. Franco,et al.  Perspectives for the use of biomass as fuel in combined cycle power plants , 2005 .