Methods for the evaluation of social learning (2017-2021): systematic literature review

Providing learning opportunities, based on social interaction and shared knowledge in the pursuit of a common goal, is a transcendental aspect in the field of training. In this sense, in contemporary education, the analysis of social learning becomes relevant and, consequently, it is necessary to identify a strategy to show how its evaluation is being carried out. Hence, the purpose of this article was to identify the organizational methods that have been used for the evaluation of social learning. For this purpose, a systematic review was conducted based on sixty studies, located between 2017 and 2021, by searching the Scopus and WoS databases with the keywords: methods, evaluation and social learning. Threemajor themes were defined to establish seven research questions that guided the search for information: characteristics of the studies, methodological design and findings. The results show that the greatest scientific production on the subject is found in the United States; in addition, participatory methods and peer support are essential to strengthen social interaction; furthermore, greater innovation is identified, in terms of new knowledge and areas of opportunity are detected for research on methods involving new processes and new services for the evaluation of social learning; there is greater evidence of this evaluation in the educational context related to higher education and in the social context directed towards professional training; with respect to the organizational methods of evaluation, these are focused on shared experiences through networks, co-creation and shared research; finally, opportunities for future research are evident in the analysis of methods involving social capital and peer education.

[1]  Valerie Anderson,et al.  An evaluation of social learning and learner outcomes in a massive open online course (MOOC): a healthcare sector case study , 2020, Human Resource Development International.

[2]  Andrés Chiappe,et al.  Open Assessment of Learning: A Meta-Synthesis , 2016 .

[3]  M. Ramírez-Montoya Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review , 2020, Sustainability.

[4]  Yunjin Oh,et al.  The Effects of Online Interactions on the Relationship Between Learning-Related Anxiety and Intention to Persist Among E-Learning Students with Visual Impairment , 2016 .

[5]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Future direction for the CSCL field: Methodologies and eight controversies , 2017, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[6]  M. Ramírez-Montoya,et al.  Systematic review of mixed methods in the framework of educational innovation , 2020 .

[7]  P. Buckley,et al.  The impact of co-creation: an analysis of the effectiveness of student authored multiple choice questions on achievement of learning outcomes , 2020, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Dialogue as Data in Learning Analytics for Productive Educational Dialogue , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[9]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering , 2006, ICSE.

[10]  E. Wenger,et al.  Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[11]  Nick V. Flor,et al.  Employing Social Learning Analytic Methods (SLAMs) to Reimagine the Social Dynamic of Online Learning Collaborations , 2020 .

[12]  F. García-Peñalvo Mapeos sistemáticos de literatura, revisiones sistemáticas de literatura y benchmarking de programas formativos , 2017 .

[13]  Ig Ibert Bittencourt,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Web-Based Educational Software: A Systematic Mapping , 2015, 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[14]  H. Z. Schuttenberg,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Science and Governance in a Diverse World: Coproduction and Coproductive Capacities for Environmental Management Seeking our shared wisdom: a framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities , 2015 .

[15]  S. Brown,et al.  El futuro de la evaluación en la educación superior , 2020 .

[16]  van den Aaj Antoine Beemt,et al.  What’s in a name: dimensions of social learning in teacher groups , 2016 .

[17]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[18]  D. Boud,et al.  The future of assessment in Higher Education , 2020 .

[19]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  I. Fernández,et al.  Social Learning Analytics in Higher Education. An experience at the Primary Education stage , 2017 .