Functional substrates for flexible organic photovoltaic cells

Along with efficiency and lifetime, costs are one of the most important aspects for the commercialization of organic solar cells. Thinking of large scale production of organic solar cells by an efficient reel-to-reel process, the materials are expected to determine the costs of the final product. Our approach is to develop functional substrates for organic solar cells which have the potential for cost effective production. The functionality is obtained by combining periodically microstructured substrates with lamellar electrode structures. Such structured substrates were fabricated by cost effective replication from masterstructures that were generated by large area interference lithography. Two cell architectures were investigated - holographic microprisms and interdigital buried nanoelectrodes. A structure period of 20 μm in combination with a 2 μm wide metal grid was chosen for the microprism cells based on the results of electrical calculations. Current-voltage curves with reasonable fill factors were measured for these devices. A significant light trapping effect was predicted from optical simulations. Interdigital buried nanoelectrodes are embedded in the photoactive layer of the solar cell. Separated interdigital metal electrodes with a sufficiently high parallel resistance were manufactured despite a small electrode distance below 400 nm. Experimental results on first photovoltaic devices will be presented. We observe an insufficient rectification of the photovoltaic device which we attribute to partial electron injection into the gold anode.

[1]  Philippe Lalanne,et al.  Computation of the near-field pattern with the coupled-wave method for transverse magnetic polarization , 1998 .

[2]  A. Gombert,et al.  Functional microprism substrate for organic solar cells , 2006 .

[3]  C. Brabec,et al.  2.5% efficient organic plastic solar cells , 2001 .

[4]  Volker Wittwer,et al.  Diffraction gratings and buried nano-electrodes—architectures for organic solar cells , 2004 .

[5]  T K Gaylord,et al.  Coupled-wave analysis of reflection gratings. , 1981, Applied optics.

[6]  G. Hadziioannou,et al.  On interface dipole layers between C60 and Ag or Au , 2002 .

[7]  A. Hinsch,et al.  Electroabsorption studies of organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells , 2005 .

[8]  T. Gaylord,et al.  Diffraction analysis of dielectric surface-relief gratings , 1982 .

[9]  P. Heremans,et al.  Polythiophene based bulk heterojunction solar cells: morphology and its implications , 2006 .

[10]  Dieter Meissner,et al.  Optical constants of conjugated polymer/fullerene based bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells , 2002 .

[11]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Recombination and loss analysis in polythiophene based bulk heterojunction photodetectors , 2002 .

[12]  Michael Niggemann,et al.  Organic solar cells using inverted layer sequence , 2005 .

[13]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Simulation of light intensity dependent current characteristics of polymer solar cells , 2004 .

[14]  David C. Martin,et al.  Electrochemical deposition and characterization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on neural microelectrode arrays , 2003 .

[15]  P. Lalanne,et al.  Highly improved convergence of the coupled-wave method for TM polarization and conical mountings , 1996, Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics.