Transcriptional regulation of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon L1.2B

Although LINE-1 (L1) sequences constitute the most important family of retrotransposons in the human genome, their transcriptional regulation is poorly understood. Specifically, their unusual internal promoter is incompletely characterized. Current promoter prediction programs fail to identify the promoter in the 5′UTR of the active LINE-1 element L1.2B. Experimental investigation of this promoter using reporter gene assays in various human and murine cell types confirmed that the promoter consists of two segments, and demonstrated that the distal portion is essential for cell-type-independent activity. No differences in promoter activity were found between normal and transformed cells. The complete promoter was shown to possess ≈20% of the activity of the strong early promoter of cytomegalovirus, and to be capable of directing the expression of levels of p53 sufficient to kill normal and transformed human cells. Thus, active LINE-1 elements contain highly active promoters capable of driving cell-type-independent expression, which are of potential use in mammalian expression constructs. In vitro methylation of the promoter at Hpa II sites decreased its activity independently of cell type, but this repression was alleviated in MBD2−/− cells. Surprisingly, mutation of specific Hpa II sites was also found to reduce promoter activity. Thus, efficient repression of the L1.2B promoter by DNA methylation may involve MBD2 binding, but at least one Hpa II site also appears to be involved specifically in transcriptional activation. Since neither promoter activity nor the efficiency of repression by methylation differed between normal and tumor cells, the re-activation of LINE-1 sequences observed in tumor cells is probably caused by hypomethylation of the promoter.

[1]  Michael Boshart,et al.  A very strong enhancer is located upstream of an immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus , 1985, Cell.

[2]  J. Spandorfer,et al.  Insertional mutagenesis of the myc locus by a LINE-1 sequence in a human breast carcinoma , 1988, Nature.

[3]  S. Antonarakis,et al.  Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L1 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man , 1988, Nature.

[4]  W. Schulz,et al.  Constitutive c-myc expression enhances proliferation of differentiating F9 teratocarcinoma cells. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  G. Swergold Identification, characterization, and cell specificity of a human LINE-1 promoter , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[6]  P. Wagner,et al.  A human tumour-derived mutant p53 protein induces a p34cdc2 reversible growth arrest in fission yeast. , 1991, Oncogene.

[7]  A. F. Scott,et al.  Isolation of an active human transposable element. , 1991, Science.

[8]  M. Hattori,et al.  Identification of an internal cis-element essential for the human L1 transcription and a nuclear factor(s) binding to the element. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Disruption of the APC gene by a retrotransposal insertion of L1 sequence in a colon cancer. , 1992, Cancer research.

[10]  Bratthauer Gl,et al.  Active LINE-1 retrotransposons in human testicular cancer. , 1992 .

[11]  R. E. Thayer,et al.  Binding of the ubiquitous nuclear transcription factor YY1 to a cis regulatory sequence in the human LINE-1 transposable element. , 1993, Human molecular genetics.

[12]  David Ghosh,et al.  Status of the transcription factors database (TFD) , 1993, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  R. E. Thayer,et al.  LINE-1: a human transposable element. , 1993, Gene.

[14]  E. Wingender,et al.  Recognition of regulatory regions in genomic sequences. , 1994, Journal of biotechnology.

[15]  D. F. Thomas,et al.  Normal human urothelial cells in vitro: proliferation and induction of stratification. , 1994, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[16]  H. Kazazian,et al.  A new retrotransposable human L1 element from the LRE2 locus on chromosome 1q produces a chimaeric insertion , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[17]  D. S. Prestridge Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  M. Hattori,et al.  RNA polymerase III dependence of the human L1 promoter and possible participation of the RNA polymerase II factor YY1 in the RNA polymerase III transcription system. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  J. Brosius,et al.  Evolution, expression, and possible function of a master gene for amplification of an interspersed repeated DNA family in rodents. , 1996, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[20]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  J. V. Moran,et al.  An actively retrotransposing, novel subfamily of mouse L1 elements , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[22]  R. Löwer,et al.  DNA methylation and expression of LINE-1 and HERV-K provirus sequences in urothelial and renal cell carcinomas , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  Steen Knudsen,et al.  Promoter2.0: for the recognition of PolII promoter sequences , 1999, Bioinform..

[24]  H. Kazazian L1 Retrotransposons Shape the Mammalian Genome , 2000, Science.

[25]  M. Carvalho,et al.  DNA Release by Line‐1 (L1) Retrotransposon Could It Be Possible? , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  T. Werner,et al.  Highly specific localization of promoter regions in large genomic sequences by PromoterInspector: a novel context analysis approach. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  T. Heidmann,et al.  Members of the SRY family regulate the human LINE retrotransposons. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Computational identification of promoters and first exons in the human genome , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[29]  E. Ostertag,et al.  Twin priming: a proposed mechanism for the creation of inversions in L1 retrotransposition. , 2001, Genome research.

[30]  N. Zingler,et al.  Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 represses LINE-1 expression and retrotransposition but not Alu transcription. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  A. Bird,et al.  Closely related proteins MBD2 and MBD3 play distinctive but interacting roles in mouse development. , 2001, Genes & development.

[32]  Heinrich Niemann,et al.  Joint modeling of DNA sequence and physical properties to improve eukaryotic promoter recognition , 2001, ISMB.

[33]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[34]  J. V. Moran,et al.  DNA repair mediated by endonuclease-independent LINE-1 retrotransposition , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Vladimir B. Bajic,et al.  Dragon Promoter Finder: recognition of vertebrate RNA polymerase II promoters , 2002, Bioinform..

[36]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Genomic Deletions Created upon LINE-1 Retrotransposition , 2002, Cell.

[37]  W. Schulz,et al.  Activity of E2F-dependent promoters in bladder carcinoma cells and their use for tumour-specific targeting of p53-induced apoptosis. , 2002, International journal of oncology.

[38]  N. Yang,et al.  An important role for RUNX3 in human L1 transcription and retrotransposition. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  W. Schulz,et al.  Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and deregulation of the c-myc gene in urothelial cancer cell lines , 2004, Urological Research.