Continuity of Reflectance Data between Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI, for Both Top-of-Atmosphere and Surface Reflectance: A Study in the Australian Landscape

The new Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) is intended to be broadly compatible with the previous Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). The spectral response of the OLI is slightly different to the ETM+, and so there may be slight differences in the reflectance measurements. Since the differences are a function not just of spectral responses, but also of the target pixels, there is a need to assess these differences in practice, using imagery from the area of interest. This paper presents a large scale study of the differences between ETM+ and OLI in the Australian landscape. The analysis is carried out in terms of both top-of-atmosphere and surface reflectance, and also in terms of biophysical parameters modelled from those respective reflectance spectra. The results show small differences between the sensors, which can be magnified by modelling to a biophysical parameter. It is also shown that a part of this difference appears to be systematic, and can be reliably removed by regression equations to predict ETM+ reflectance from OLI reflectance, before applying biophysical models. This is important when models have been fitted to historical field data coincident with ETM+ imagery. However, there will remain a small per-pixel difference which could be an unwanted source of variability.

[1]  Scott L. Powell,et al.  Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing , 2014 .

[2]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  A. Huete,et al.  A review of vegetation indices , 1995 .

[4]  Julia A. Barsi,et al.  The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission , 2012 .

[5]  Scarth Peter Tracking Grazing Pressure and Climate Interaction - The Role of Landsat Fractional Cover in Time Series Analysis , 2012 .

[6]  John R. Dymond,et al.  Correction of the topographic effect in remote sensing , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Peter Scarth,et al.  Prediction and validation of foliage projective cover from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery , 2009 .

[8]  N. Flood,et al.  Limitations of the dense dark vegetation method for aerosol retrieval under Australian conditions , 2012 .

[9]  T. Malthus,et al.  Assessing the effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil fractions from Landsat and MODIS data , 2015 .

[10]  Peter Scarth,et al.  Remote sensing of tree-grass systems: The Eastern Australian woodlands , 2010 .

[11]  J. L. Barker,et al.  Radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets , 2001 .

[12]  N. Flood,et al.  On determining appropriate aerosol optical depth values for atmospheric correction of satellite imagery for biophysical parameter retrieval: requirements and limitations under Australian conditions , 2013 .

[13]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  Effects of assumed solar spectral irradiance on intercomparisons of Earth-observing sensors , 2001, Remote Sensing.

[14]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  The operational land imager: spectral response and spectral uniformity , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[15]  Neil Flood,et al.  An Operational Scheme for Deriving Standardised Surface Reflectance from Landsat TM/ETM+ and SPOT HRG Imagery for Eastern Australia , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[16]  E. Crist A TM Tasseled Cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data , 1985 .

[17]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data , 2012 .

[18]  N. A. Campbell,et al.  Bi-directional reflectance distribution function approaches to radiometric calibration of Landsat ETM+ imagery , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[19]  B. Markham,et al.  Forty-year calibrated record of earth-reflected radiance from Landsat: A review , 2012 .

[20]  W. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection , 2005 .

[21]  W. Cohen,et al.  Landsat's Role in Ecological Applications of Remote Sensing , 2004 .

[22]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery , 2012 .

[23]  Zhiming Feng,et al.  Cross-Comparison of Vegetation Indices Derived from Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) Sensors , 2013, Remote. Sens..