Actor-Network Theory: sensitive terms and enduring tensions

ANT is not a "theory", or, if it is, then a "theory" does not necessarily offer a coherent framework, but may as well be an adaptable, open repository. A list of terms. A set of sensitivities. If ANT is a theory, then a theory helps to tell cases, draw contrasts, articulate silent layers, turn questions upside down, focus on the unexpected, add to one’s sensitivities, propose new terms, and shift stories from one context to another. In this presentation of "Actor Network Theory" the terms "actor", "network", "theory", as well as the terms "order" and "coordination", will be explored. But mind you. ANT does not define these terms, but rather plays with them. It does not seek coherence. It does not build a stronghold. Instead of crafting an overall scheme that becomes more and more solid as it gets more and more refined, ANT texts are out to move - to generate, to transform, to translate. To enrich. And to betray.

[1]  Tiago E Moreira,et al.  Self, agency and the surgical collective: detachment. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[2]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia , 2004 .

[3]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Making Alzheimer’s disease matter. Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature , 2008 .

[4]  Pierre Lemonnier,et al.  Technological choices : transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic , 1995 .

[5]  Charis Thompson,et al.  When Elephants Stand for Competing Philosophies of Nature: Amboseli National Park, Kenya , 2002, Complexities.

[6]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[7]  Vicky Singleton,et al.  Feminism, Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Postmodernism: Politics, Theory and Me , 1996 .

[8]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[9]  M. Berg,et al.  Principles and practices of medicine , 1994, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[10]  John Law,et al.  Globalisation in practice: On the politics of boiling pigswill , 2008 .

[11]  J. Johnson.  Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer , 1988 .

[12]  J. Pols.  Enacting Appreciations: Beyond the Patient Perspective , 2005, Health Care Analysis.

[13]  V. Rabeharisoa,et al.  From representation to mediation: the shaping of collective mobilization on muscular dystrophy in France. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[14]  Steve Woolgar.  What happened to provocation in science and technology studies? , 2004 .

[15]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[16]  Madeleine Akrich.  Essay of Technosociology: A Gasogene in Costa Rica , 1993 .

[17]  John Law,et al.  Traduction / Trahison: Notes on ANT , 2006 .

[18]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[19]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[20]  C. Lawrence.  The pasteurization of France , 1990, Medical History.

[21]  J. Buckley,et al.  Parasites , 1965 .

[22]  M. Schlossberg.  Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. , 1990 .

[23]  J. Law,et al.  Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices , 2002 .

[24]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The politics of explanation: An alternative , 1988 .

[25]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Heterogeneity and Coordination of Blood Pressure in Neurosurgery , 2006 .

[26]  Nick Bingham,et al.  Slowing things down: Lessons from the GM controversy , 2008 .

[27]  Nicolas Dodier,et al.  Clinical Practice and Procedures in Occupational Medicine: A Study of the Framing of Individuals , 1998, Differences in Medicine.

[28]  John Law,et al.  Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience , 2002 .

[29]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[30]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[31]  A. Barry.  Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[32]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[33]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[34]  H. Harbers,et al.  The body multiple , 2005 .

[35]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[36]  Charis M. Cussins.  ONTOLOGICAL CHOREOGRAPHY:: AGENCY FOR WOMEN PATIENTS IN AN INFERTILITY CLINIC , 1998 .

[37]  Helen Verran,et al.  Science and an African logic , 2001 .

[38]  D Hardcastle.  Food matters , 2008, Veterinary Record.

[39]  Peter Morgan.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump , 1989 .

[40]  Jessica Mesman,et al.  Neonatal Food and the Politics of Theory: Some Questions of Method , 1996 .

[41]  Cécile Méadel,et al.  Taste as a form of adjustment between food and consumers , 2001 .

[42]  Amade M’charek,et al.  The Human Genome Diversity Project: An Ethnography of Scientific Practice , 2005 .

[43]  Mike Michael,et al.  Actor-Networks and Ambivalence: General Practitioners in the UK Cervical Screening Programme , 1993 .

[44]  Bernike Pasveer,et al.  Multiplying Obstetrics: Techniques of Surveillance and Forms of Coordination , 2000, Theoretical medicine and bioethics.

[45]  Douglas Odegard,et al.  Knowledge and Reflexivity , 1976, Dialogue.

[46]  J. Law,et al.  On the Subject of the Object: Narrative, Technology, and Interpellation , 2000 .

[47]  M. Akrich,et al.  Embodiment and Disembodiment in Childbirth Narratives , 2004 .

[48]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal , 2006 .

[49]  John Law,et al.  Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities , 2001 .

[50]  Nick Bingham,et al.  Object-Ions: From Technological Determinism towards Geographies of Relations , 1996 .

[51]  Antoine Hennion.  Music Lovers , 2001 .

[52]  B. Latour.  Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.