Airport Privatisation and Safety: Does Ownership Type Affect Safety?

Abstract In the summer of 2004, the Dutch cabinet decided on the privatisation of the largest airport in the Netherlands—Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AAS). Privatisation processes have generated policy questions which have focused on assuring that public values such as safety at airports remains at levels that are considered sufficient after privatisation takes place. In this article, an attempt is made to assess the effects of the proposed privatisation on the management of safety on and around the airport. As little empirical evidence exists about the potential effects of privatisation of airport operators on the safety of air transportation, the research used a ‘worst-case scenario analysis’ to assess potential effects of a (partial) privatisation of the airport operator. Based upon a detailed investigation of a number of activities performed by the airport operator and a comparative analysis of safety regulatory systems of two other European (partly) privatised airports, we conclude that the level of safety at the airport is not directly affected as a result of the (partial) privatisation of the airport operator, but that compared to the situation in which the airport operator remains a public entity, the safety regulatory system as a whole has become less robust.

[1]  O. Betancor,et al.  Regulating Privatized Infrastructures and Airport Services , 1999 .

[2]  E. Juan.  Privatizing airports - options and case studies , 1996 .

[3]  R. I. Muttram,et al.  UK railway restructuring and the impact on the safety performance of heavy rail network , 2003 .

[4]  M. Landau,et al.  The Arrogance of Optimism: Notes on Failure‐Avoidance Management , 1995 .

[5]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[6]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Safety Management: The Challenge of Change , 2000 .

[7]  K. Mew.  The Privatization of Commercial Airports in the United States , 2000 .

[8]  Andrew Hale.  Management of safety in systems , 1997 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Solomon,et al.  AIRPORT GROWTH AND SAFETY: A STUDY OF THE EXTERNAL RISKS OF SCHIPHOL AIRPORT AND POSSIBLE SAFETY-ENHANCEMENT MEASURES , 2000 .

[10]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Regulating airport safety: the case of Schiphol , 2001 .

[11]  R. de Neufville,et al.  DEREGULATION INDUCED VOLATILITY OF AIRPORT TRAFFIC. , 1991 .

[12]  Andrew W Evans,et al.  Rail safety and rail privatisation in Britain. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Privatization and regulation of transport infrastructure : guidelines for policymakers and regulators , 2000 .

[14]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[15]  D. Maidment.  Privatisation-and Division into Competing Units as a Challence for Safety Management , 1998 .

[16]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .