The interpretation of gravity anomaly data suffers from a fundamental nonuniqueness, even when the solution set is bounded by physical or geologic constraints. Therefore, constructing a single solution that fits or approximately fits the data is of limited value. Consequently, much effort has been applied in recent years to developing inverse techniques for rigorous deduction of properties common to all possible solutions. To this end, Parker developed the theory of an ideal body, which characterizes the extremal solution with the smallest possible maximum density. Gravity ideal‐body analysis is an excellent reconaissance exploration tool because it is especially well suited for handling sparse data contaminated with noise, for finding useful, rigorous bounds on the infinite solution set, and for predicting accurately what data need to be collected in order to tighten those bounds. We present a practical three‐ dimensional gravity ideal‐body computer code, IDB, that can optimize a mesh with over 105 cells...
[1]
M. Ander,et al.
IDB2—A Fortran program for computing extremal bounds in gravity data interpretation
,
1983
.
[2]
M. Ander,et al.
Mafic intrusion beneath the Zuni-Bandera volcanic field, New Mexico
,
1982
.
[3]
Michel Cuer,et al.
Fortran routines for linear inverse problems
,
1980
.
[4]
Stephen P. Huestis,et al.
Extremal temperature bounds from surface gradient measurements
,
1979
.
[5]
R. Parker,et al.
Bounding the Thickness of the Oceanic Magnetized Layer (Paper 7B0471)
,
1977
.
[6]
Michel Cuer,et al.
Some applications of linear programming to the inverse gravity problem
,
1977
.
[7]
R. Parker.
Best bounds on density and depth from gravity data
,
1974
.