To go or not to go? Pupillometry elucidates inhibitory mechanisms in motor imagery

ABSTRACT Motor imagery (MI) involves consciously performing an action in our minds without engaging in overt physical movement. Although inhibition is crucial to MI, few studies have explored the nature of inhibitory mechanisms underlying this construct. Therefore, little progress has been made in elucidating how or when inhibition is implemented during MI. The present study addressed this unresolved issue by measuring participants’ pupil dilation (an index of attentional effort) as they performed an inhibitory-control (Go/NoGo) procedure in a modified task-switching paradigm. The results showed that inhibitory mechanisms in MI may be implemented via various routes. When MI was the only movement mode used, minimal attentional effort was invested during the Go/NoGo responses, suggesting an early implemented, proactive inhibitory strategy. Conversely, when imagery was preceded by physical movement responses, inhibition required greater attentional effort and it appears as though more active and attention-demanding inhibitory processes must be employed.

[1]  F. Verbruggen,et al.  Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  M. Carrillo-de-la-Peña,et al.  When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Carolyn Copper,et al.  Does mental practice enhance performance , 1994 .

[4]  M. Jeannerod Actions from within , 2004 .

[5]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  J. Doyon,et al.  Online and Offline Performance Gains Following Motor Imagery Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Studies , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Does Imagery Work? Effects on Performance and Mental Skills , 2008 .

[9]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: evidence from pupillary responses. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[11]  C. Stinear Corticospinal facilitation during motor imagery , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Lotze,et al.  Kinesthetic imagery of musical performance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  P. Jackson,et al.  The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  T. Braver The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  M. Bove,et al.  Motor cortical plasticity induced by motor learning through mental practice , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[16]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[17]  H. Siebner,et al.  Effector‐independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  L. Papeo,et al.  The Invariance Problem in Infancy , 2014, Psychological science.

[20]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized , 2012, NeuroImage.

[21]  C Collet,et al.  Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  Franck Vidal,et al.  An ERP study of cognitive architecture and the insertion of mental processes: Donders revisited. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[23]  Hayley J. MacDonald,et al.  An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition , 2017, PloS one.

[24]  Maria K. Eckstein,et al.  Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? , 2016, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fully Formatted Pdf and Full Text (html) Versions Will Be Made Available Soon. Pupil Dilation Betrays the Timing of Decisions , 2022 .

[26]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Structural and functional correlates of motor imagery BCI performance: Insights from the patterns of fronto-parietal attention network , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  B. Forstmann,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the Sirens. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[28]  Sara López-Martín,et al.  Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  Simon van Gaal,et al.  Unconscious Activation of the Prefrontal No-Go Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  M. Hoshiyama,et al.  Functional inter-cortical connectivity among motor-related cortices during motor imagery: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2017, Somatosensory & motor research.

[32]  A. Guillot,et al.  The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery , 2010 .

[33]  Sam J. Cooley,et al.  Methodological Variations in Guided Imagery Interventions Using Movement Imagery Scripts in Sport: A Systematic Review , 2013 .

[34]  E. Bricolo,et al.  Mental practice promotes motor anticipation: evidence from skilled music performance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Ian Greenhouse,et al.  Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  “Don׳t” versus “Won׳t”: Principles, mechanisms, and intention in action inhibition , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works: A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise , 2015, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[39]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[40]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[41]  J. Jonides,et al.  Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  D. Markland,et al.  Movement imagery ability: development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. , 2008, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[43]  Youngmoo E. Kim,et al.  Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS , 2017, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[44]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Amitash Ojha,et al.  Modulation of resource allocation by intelligent individuals in linguistic, mathematical and visuo-spatial tasks. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  O. White,et al.  Pupil Diameter May Reflect Motor Control and Learning , 2017, Journal of motor behavior.

[47]  A. Moran,et al.  Does Motor Simulation Theory Explain the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Motor Imagery? A Critical Review , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  Inhibition in motor imagery: a novel action mode switching paradigm , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .

[50]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  The role of inhibition in task switching: A review , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Panagiotis Bamidis,et al.  Effects of imagery training on cognitive performance and use of physiological measures as an assessment tool of mental effort , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[53]  J Beatty,et al.  Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: a pupillometric analysis. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Aidan Moran,et al.  Measuring Motor Imagery Using Psychometric, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Tools , 2011, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[55]  David F. Nichols,et al.  Changes in pupil diameter entrained by cortically initiated changes in attention , 2012, Visual Neuroscience.

[56]  A. Allport,et al.  Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs” , 2000, Psychological research.

[57]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  Markus H. Sneve,et al.  Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[59]  V. Gallese,et al.  Motor Inhibition during Overt and Covert Actions: An Electrical Neuroimaging Study , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[61]  Joaquin A. Anguera,et al.  Reconciling the influence of task-set switching and motor inhibition processes on stop signal after-effects , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[62]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions , 2012 .

[63]  M. Erb,et al.  Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[65]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[66]  J B Poline,et al.  Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  Sylvain Sirois,et al.  Infant cognition: going full factorial with pupil dilation. , 2009, Developmental science.

[68]  J. Baron,et al.  Does motor imagery share neural networks with executed movement: a multivariate fMRI analysis , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  N. Taatgen,et al.  What happens when we switch tasks: pupil dilation in multitasking. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[70]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Mental Practice Enhances Surgical Technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[71]  Robert Hester,et al.  Motivationally Significant Self-control: Enhanced Action Withholding Involves the Right Inferior Frontal Junction , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  L. Battelli,et al.  The critical role of the dorsal fronto-median cortex in voluntary action inhibition: A TMS study , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[73]  K. Jellinger Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[74]  F. Lebon,et al.  Motor imagery and cortico-spinal excitability: A review , 2016, European journal of sport science.

[75]  Andrew P. Smith,et al.  Caffeine and Central Noradrenaline: Effects on Mood, Cognitive Performance, Eye Movements and Cardiovascular Function , 2003, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[76]  C. Delpuech,et al.  Motor inhibition during motor imagery: A MEG study with a quadriplegic patient , 2014, Neurocase.

[77]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[78]  K. Zentgraf,et al.  Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[79]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[80]  A. Guillot,et al.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[81]  S. Sternberg,et al.  Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[82]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[83]  A. Guillot,et al.  Re-imagining motor imagery: building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and sport psychology. , 2012, British journal of psychology.