Performance of smoke elimination and confinement with modified hybrid ventilation for subway station

Abstract Smoke is the element of a fire that causes the greatest loss of life. The importance of eliminating smoke is underscored in the fire safety engineering of underground subway stations. In this study, an experiment and a numerical simulation were performed to determine the efficacy of different ventilation modes. The experiment was conducted on a 1:50 scale model of a subway station and a complementary Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) simulation was performed on a full scale station. The influences of natural ventilation, mechanical ventilation and hybrid ventilation were examined. The results indicated that natural ventilation was good for smoke elimination when the fire source was under the dome, and the gas temperature measured in the middle of the basement 1 decreased significantly as the size of the vent increased. Smoke was exhausted from the basement 1 and fresh air supplied into the basements 2 and 3, which had the best efficacy when managing the smoke diffusion. No matter that the fire source was under the dome or out of the atrium, the carbon monoxide (CO) concentration was the smallest when the modified hybrid ventilation system was in operation. At the same time, changes in the natural ventilation vent had an influence on smoke elimination and the efficacy of smoke elimination became better with the increasing of the dimension of the vent when the fire location was under the dome.

[1]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Effect of varying two key parameters in simulating evacuation for subway stations in China , 2010 .

[2]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Life Safety Evacuation for Cross Interchange Subway Station fire , 2012 .

[3]  L H Hu,et al.  Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel: Fire Dynamics Simulator comparisons with measured data. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Maria Kolokotroni,et al.  Dynamic thermal CFD simulation of a typical office by efficient transient solution methods , 2005 .

[5]  Glenn P. Forney,et al.  Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 2) -- Technical Reference Guide | NIST , 2001 .

[6]  Angui Li,et al.  Experimental analysis on the air distribution of powerhouse of Hohhot hydropower station with 2D-PIV , 2010 .

[7]  Ha-Yong Kim,et al.  A study of optimal vent mode for the smoke control of subway station fire , 2006 .

[8]  H. B. Wang,et al.  Confinement of fire-induced smoke and carbon monoxide transportation by air curtain in channels. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Fire dynamics simulator (ver-sion 3) technical reference guide , 2001 .

[10]  Jie Ji,et al.  A simplified calculation method on maximum smoke temperature under the ceiling in subway station fires , 2011 .

[11]  Jean-Michel Most,et al.  Large-eddy-simulation of buoyancy-driven fire propagation behind a pyrolysis zone along a vertical wall , 2002 .

[12]  Paul Jowitt,et al.  The influence of longitudinal ventilation systems on fires in tunnels , 2001 .

[13]  Alvaro Valencia,et al.  Heat confinement in tunnels between two double-stream twin-jet air curtains ☆ , 2009 .

[14]  Wang Binbin Comparative Research on FLUENT and FDS's Numerical Simulation of Smoke Spread in Subway Platform Fire , 2011 .

[15]  Jurij Modic,et al.  Fire simulation in road tunnels , 2003 .

[16]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Correlation equations on fire-induced air flow rates through doorway derived by large eddy simulation , 2005 .

[17]  Hee-Chul Chang,et al.  Numerical predictions of smoke movement in a subway station under ventilation , 2006 .

[18]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  CFD modelling of air flow and thermal performance of an atrium integrated with photovoltaics , 2004 .

[19]  G. Cox,et al.  Field Modelling of Fire in Forced Ventilated Enclosures , 1987 .

[20]  Angui Li,et al.  Prediction of the spread of smoke in a huge transit terminal subway station under six different fire scenarios , 2012 .

[21]  Hong Sun Ryou,et al.  CFD simulation and assessment of life safety in a subway train fire , 2009 .

[22]  Weigang Zhang,et al.  Turbulence statistics in a fire room model by large eddy simulation , 2002 .

[23]  Angui Li,et al.  Fire-induced smoke control via hybrid ventilation in a huge transit terminal subway station , 2012 .

[24]  Ran Gao,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian crowds' evacuation in a huge transit terminal subway station , 2012 .

[25]  J. C. Ho,et al.  Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation , 2001 .

[26]  Shijun You,et al.  CFD simulation and optimization of the ventilation for subway side-platform , 2007 .

[27]  Dong Wang,et al.  Study of the Performance of Smoke Control under Non-uniform Smoke Exhaust Velocity , 2011 .