A Method for Gauging Landscape Change as a Prelude to Urban Watershed Regeneration: The Case of the Carioca River, Rio de Janeiro

Natural systems undergo processes, flows, and rhythms that differ from those of urban sociocultural systems. While the former takes place over eras or many generations, the latter may occur within years or even months. Natural systems change includes no principle of intentional progress or enhancement of complexity. In contrast, sociocultural systems change occurs through inherited characteristics, learning, and cultural transmission [1]. Both are dynamic, heterogeneous, and vulnerable to regime shifts, and are inextricably linked. The interrelations among natural and anthropogenic factors affecting sustainability vary spatially and temporally. This paper focuses on landscape changes along the Carioca River valley in Rio de Janeiro, located in the Brazilian Neotropical Southeastern Region, and its implications for local urban sustainability. The study incorporates a transdisciplinary approach that integrates landscape ecology and urban morphology methodologies to gauge landscape change and assess social-ecological systems dynamics. The methodology includes a variety of landscape change assessments; including on-site landscape ecological, landscape morphology, biological and urbanistic surveys, to gauge urban watershed quality. It presents an adapted inventory for assessment of urban tropical rivers, Neotropical Urban Stream Visual Assessment Protocol (NUSVAP), and correlates the level of stream and rainforest integrity to local urban environmental patterns and processes. How can urban regional land managers, planners and communities work together to promote shifts toward more desirable configurations and processes? An understanding of the transient behavior of social-ecological systems and how they respond to change and disturbance is fundamental to building appropriate management strategies and fostering resilience, regenerative capacity, and sustainable development in urban watersheds. The sociocultural patterns, processes and dynamics of Rio’s hillsides suggest that increasing the multifunctionality, flexibility, adaptability and connectivity of open spaces may influence carrying, adaptive and regenerative capacities of urban landscape systems.

[1]  I. S. Zonneveld,et al.  Land ecology : an introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation , 1995 .

[2]  Ann Riley,et al.  Restoring streams in cities : a guide for planners, policy makers, and citizens , 1998 .

[3]  J. Ahern From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world , 2011 .

[4]  R. Cassen Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .

[5]  R. Gardner,et al.  Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology , 1991 .

[6]  Robert C. Petersen,et al.  The RCE: a Riparian, Channel, and Environmental Inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape , 1992 .

[7]  R. V. Ruhe Geomorphology: Geomorphic processes and surficial geology , 1975 .

[8]  Policy Division Our Common Journey:: A Transition Toward Sustainability , 1999 .

[9]  Alisa W. Coffin,et al.  PLACING NATURE: CULTURE AND LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 1999, Landscape Journal.

[10]  S. Kostof The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History , 1991 .

[11]  Paul Brown,et al.  Planning and Design for Sustainable and Resilient Cities: Theories, Strategies, and Best Practices for Green Infrastructure , 2010 .

[12]  Dazhong Wen Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1997 .

[13]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[14]  A. Galston Fundamentals of Ecology , 1972, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[15]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[16]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning , 2002 .

[17]  Dm Pearson,et al.  Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology , 2006 .

[18]  S. Gould Bully for brontosaurus : reflections in natural history , 1991 .

[19]  Forster Ndubisi,et al.  Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis , 2002 .

[20]  Shu-Li Huang,et al.  Resilience analysis of the interaction of between typhoons and land use change , 2012 .

[21]  C. S. Holling Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[22]  T. Jahn,et al.  Sustainability and the social sciences : a cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation , 1999 .

[23]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[24]  Michael Hough,et al.  Cities and natural process , 1994 .

[25]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[26]  R. Pachauri Science and Technology for Sustainable Well Being , 2008 .

[27]  G. Daily,et al.  Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization , 2012, Nature.

[28]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[29]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[30]  Willy A. Lacerda,et al.  Landslide susceptibility in a mountainous geoecosystem, Tijuca Massif, Rio de Janeiro: The role of morphometric subdivision of the terrain , 2007 .

[31]  Jack Ahern,et al.  Spatial Concepts, Planning Strategies, and Future Scenarios: A Framework Method for Integrating Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning , 1999 .

[32]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Monitoring land supply with geographic information systems : theory, practice, and parcel-based approaches , 2000 .

[33]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology , 1965 .