Study protocol: PoPE-Prediction of Preterm delivery by Electrohysterography

BackgroundTraditional methods used for prediction of preterm delivery are subjective and inaccurate. The Electrohysterogram (EHG) and in particular the estimation of the EHG conduction velocity, is a relatively new promising method for detecting imminent preterm delivery. To date the analysis of the conduction velocity has relied on visual inspection of the signals. As a next step towards the introduction of EHG analysis as a clinical tool, we propose an automated method for EHG conduction velocity estimation for both the speed and direction of single spike propagation.Methods/DesignThe study design will be an observational cohort study. 100 pregnant women, gestational age between 23 + 5 and 34 weeks, admitted for threatening preterm labor or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, will be included. The length of the cervical canal will be measured by transvaginal ultrasound. The EHG will be recorded using 4 electrodes in a fixed configuration. Contractions will be detected by analysis of the EHG and using an estimation of the intra uterine pressure. In the selected contractions, the delays between channels will be estimated by cross-correlation, and subsequently, the average EHG conduction velocity will be derived. Patients will be classified as labor group and non-labor group based on the time between measurement and delivery. The average conduction velocity and cervical length will be compared between the groups. The main study endpoints will be sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve for delivery within 1,2,4,7, and 14 days from the measurement.DiscussionIn this study, the diagnostic accuracy of EHG conduction velocity analysis will be evaluated for detecting preterm labor. Visual and automatic detection of contractions will be compared. Planar wave propagation will be assumed for the calculation of the CV vector.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN07603227.

[1]  H. Parkington,et al.  Co-ordination of electrical activity in the myometrium of pregnant ewes. , 1988, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[2]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[3]  S. Miller,et al.  Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions. , 1988, Oxford reviews of reproductive biology.

[4]  C Marque,et al.  [Evolution of electrohysterogram signals synchronization according to term of pregnancy: interest for preterm labor diagnosis]. , 2012, Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite.

[5]  W. Lammers,et al.  The Electrical Activities of the Uterus During Pregnancy , 2013, Reproductive Sciences.

[6]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[7]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  M. Fejgin,et al.  A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Better Pregnancy Monitoring Using Nonlinear Correlation Analysis of External Uterine Electromyography , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Gazmararian,et al.  Hospitalizations During Pregnancy Among Managed Care Enrollees , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  I. van der Tweel,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Taylor,et al.  Hospitalizations for Severe Complications of Pregnancy, 1987–1992 , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Peter Johansen,et al.  Electrohysterography of labor contractions: propagation velocity and direction , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  T. Vanner,et al.  Intrapartum assessment of uterine activity. , 1996, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. Lawn,et al.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data , 2010, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[18]  J. Zamora,et al.  Fetal Fibronectin as a Short-Term Predictor of Preterm Birth in Symptomatic Patients: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Joy E. Lawn,et al.  Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth , 2012 .

[20]  S. Papatheodorou,et al.  Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta‐analysis , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  E. Amon,et al.  Tocolysis With Advanced Cervical Dilatation , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Shalom Darmanjian,et al.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Uterine EHG Processing for Obstetrical Monitorng , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Jan W. M. Bergmans,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of the Electrohysterographic Action-Potential Conduction Velocity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  W. Lammers,et al.  Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea pig uterus. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[26]  J. Gondry,et al.  Évolution de la synchronisation des signaux de l’électromyogramme utérin en fonction du terme de grossesse, et intérêt pour la détection précoce de la menace d’accouchement prématuré , 2012 .

[27]  T. Vanner,et al.  5 Intrapartum assessment of uterine activity , 1996 .

[28]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Uterine Activity Monitoring during Labour – A Multi-Centre, Blinded Two-Way Trial of External Tocodynamometry against Electrohysterography , 2011, Zeitschrift fìr Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie.

[29]  Michael Johannes Rooijakkers,et al.  Automated Conduction Velocity Analysis in the Electrohysterogram for Prediction of Imminent Delivery: A Preliminary Study , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[30]  William C Miller,et al.  The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[32]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[33]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Velocity and Directionality of the Electrohysterographic Signal Propagation , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  Sandy Rihana,et al.  Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[38]  Z. Bhutta,et al.  BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth , 2009 .

[39]  E E Daniel,et al.  Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[40]  Mohamed A Kandil,et al.  Abdominal electromyography may predict the response to tocolysis in preterm labor. , 2012, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[41]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[42]  O. Langer,et al.  Can myometrial electrical activity identify patients in preterm labor? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.