Comparative performance of the FSCL neural net and K-means algorithm for market segmentation

Abstract Given the success of neural networks in a variety of applications in engineering, such as speech and image quantization, it is natural to consider its application to similar problems in other domains. A related problem that arises in business is market segmentation for which clustering techniques are used. In this paper, we explore the ability of a specific neural network, namely the Frequency-Sensitive Competitive Learning Algorithm (FSCL), to cluster data for developing strategic marketing decisions. To this end, we investigate the comparative performance of FSCL vis-a-vis the K-means clustering technique. A cluster analysis conducted on brand choice data for the coffee category revealed that the two methodologies resulted in widely differing cluster solutions. In an effort to address the dispute over the appropriate methodology, a comparative performance investigation was undertaken using simulated data with known cluster solutions in a fairly large experimental design to mimic varying data quality to reflect data collection and measurement error. Based on the results of these studies, it is observed that a combination of the two methodologies, wherein the results of the FSCL network are input as seeds to the K-means, seems to provide more managerially insightful segmentation schemes.

[1]  M. C. Cooper,et al.  The effect of measurement error on determining the number of clusters in clusteranalysis , 1988 .

[2]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design , 1980, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[3]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[4]  P LippmannRichard An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1988 .

[5]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms , 1980 .

[6]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[7]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern recognition, neural networks, and artificial intelligence , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Applications of counterpropagation networks , 1988, Neural Networks.

[10]  Isak Gath,et al.  Unsupervised Optimal Fuzzy Clustering , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Christopher Rose,et al.  Minimum distance automata in parallel networks for optimum classification , 1989, Neural Networks.

[12]  Stanley C. Ahalt,et al.  Competitive learning algorithms for vector quantization , 1990, Neural Networks.

[13]  André Hardy,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1994 .

[14]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An algorithm for generating artificial test clusters , 1985 .

[15]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  Methodology Review: Clustering Methods , 1987 .

[16]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[17]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Bankruptcy prediction using neural networks , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  A. J. Barr,et al.  SAS user's guide , 1979 .

[19]  RICHARD C. DUBES,et al.  How many clusters are best? - An experiment , 1987, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  W. T. Illingworth,et al.  Practical guide to neural nets , 1991 .

[21]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  A study of the classification capabilities of neural networks using unsupervised learning: A comparison withK-means clustering , 1994 .

[22]  Jorma Laaksonen,et al.  Variants of self-organizing maps , 1990, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[23]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[24]  Stanley C. Ahalt,et al.  Neural Networks for Vector Quantization of Speech and Images , 1990, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[25]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Neural networks for time-varying data , 1990 .

[26]  F. M. Murtagh,et al.  Neural networks for statistical and economic data , 1991, Neurocomputing.

[27]  Randolph E. Bucklin,et al.  Determining Interbrand Substitutability through Survey Measurement of Consumer Preference Structures , 1991 .

[28]  R. M. Cormack,et al.  A Review of Classification , 1971 .