Automatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis

SUMMARY Here we analyse aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis during manoeuvres. Chaotic deflections of the upperwing coverts observed using video cameras carried by the bird (50 frames s–1) indicate trailing-edge separation but attached flow near the leading edge during flapping and gust response, and completely stalled flows upon landing. The underwing coverts deflect automatically along the leading edge at high angle of attack. We use high-speed digital video (500 frames s–1) to analyse these deflections in greater detail during perching sequences indoors and outdoors. Outdoor perching sequences usually follow a stereotyped three-phase sequence comprising a glide, pitch-up manoeuvre and deep stall. During deep stall, the spread-eagled bird has aerodynamics reminiscent of a cross-parachute. Deployment of the underwing coverts is closely phased with wing sweeping during the pitch-up manoeuvre, and is accompanied by alula protraction. Surprisingly, active alula protraction is preceded by passive peeling from its tip. Indoor flights follow a stereotyped flapping perching sequence, with deployment of the underwing coverts closely phased with alula protraction and the end of the downstroke. We propose that the underwing coverts operate as an automatic high-lift device, analogous to a Kruger flap. We suggest that the alula operates as a strake, promoting formation of a leading-edge vortex on the swept hand-wing when the arm-wing is completely stalled, and hypothesise that its active protraction is stimulated by its initial passive deflection. These aeroelastic devices appear to be used for flow control to enhance unsteady manoeuvres, and may also provide sensory feedback.

[1]  HORACE B. Porter Flight of Birds , 1874, Nature.

[2]  R. R. Graham Safety Devices in Wings of Birds , 1932, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[3]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[4]  H. Hertel,et al.  Structure-form-movement , 1966 .

[5]  C. Pennycuick A wind tunnel study of gliding flight in the pigeon Columba livia , 1968 .

[6]  D. J. Cockrell,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics and flow round cross parachutes in steady motion , 1986 .

[7]  D. Lees,et al.  Tracks & signs of the birds of Britain and Europe: An identification guide , 1987 .

[8]  Akira Azuma,et al.  The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming , 1992 .

[9]  A. Biewener,et al.  PECTORALIS MUSCLE FORCE AND POWER OUTPUT DURING DIFFERENT MODES OF FLIGHT IN PIGEONS (COLUMBA LIVIA) , 1993 .

[10]  R. E. Brown,et al.  AIRFLOW SENSORS IN THE AVIAN WING , 1993 .

[11]  R. Wootton Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea) , 1993 .

[12]  Lars E. Ericsson,et al.  Effect of leading-edge geometry on delta wing unsteady aerodynamics , 1993 .

[13]  Tobalske,et al.  NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND KINEMATICS OF INTERMITTENT FLIGHT IN BUDGERIGARS (MELOPSITTACUS UNDULATUS) , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  R. Norberg,et al.  Swallow tail streamer is a mechanical device for self-deflection of tail leading edge, enhancing aerodynamic efficiency and flight manoeuvrability , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. V. Lowson,et al.  Vortex breakdown control by delta wing geometry , 1994 .

[16]  W. H. Liu,et al.  Flow developments above 50-deg sweep delta wings with different leading-edge profiles , 1995 .

[17]  R. H. Barnard,et al.  Aircraft Flight: A Description of the Physical Principles of Aircraft Flight , 1996 .

[18]  Muller,et al.  Air transmissivity of feathers , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  Wootton,et al.  Smart engineering in the mid-carboniferous: how well could palaeozoic dragonflies Fly? , 1998, Science.

[20]  R. Wootton,et al.  The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). I. Functional morphology and mode of operation. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  R. Wootton,et al.  The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). III. A finite element analysis of a deployable structure. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Low-Speed Pressure-Plotting Tests on a Flat-Plate M-Wing Fitted with Part-Span Nose-Flaps , 2002 .

[23]  Werner Nachtigall,et al.  Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur flugbiologischen Funktion des Daumenfittichs (Alula spuria) bei Vögeln , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[24]  G D E Povel,et al.  Leading-Edge Vortex Lifts Swifts , 2004, Science.

[25]  A Hedenström,et al.  The relationship between wingbeat kinematics and vortex wake of a thrush nightingale , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Isabel Pérez-Grande,et al.  On the aerodynamics of leading-edge high-lift devices of avian wings , 2005 .

[27]  Modelling The Effects Of Unsteady Flow Phenomena OnFlapping Flight Dynamics—stability And Control , 2006 .

[28]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[29]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Separation Control by Self-Activated Movable Flaps , 2007 .

[30]  THE AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE WING IN RED‐SHOULDERED HAWK BUTEO LZNEARZS AND A POSSIBLE AEROELASTIC ROLE OF WING‐TIP SLOTS , 2008 .

[31]  R. Wootton Support and deformability in insect wings , 2009 .