A novel algorithm for the morphometric assessment of radiotherapy treatment planning volumes.

Quantitative assessment of target volume contouring in radiotherapy treatment planning is an important aspect of quality assessment and educational exercises. The Conformity Index (CI) is a volume-based statistic frequently used for this purpose. Although the CI is relatively simple to understand and can be calculated using most treatment planning systems, it does not provide any information on the differences in shape between the two volumes. We present a new morphometric (shape-based) statistic known as the "mean distance to conformity" (MDC). For a specific volume that is being evaluated against a reference volume, the MDC represents the average distance that all outlying points in the volume must be moved in order to achieve perfect conformity with the reference volume. The MDC comprises a component related to under-contouring (where the evaluation volume is smaller than the reference volume) and a component related to over-contouring (where the evaluation extends beyond the reference volume). Furthermore, voxel-by-voxel information on conformity errors can also be displayed using a volume-error histogram. Calculation of MDC statistics is achieved using a three-dimensional grid search algorithm. By using a range of scenarios comprising both theoretical and actual clinical volumes, we demonstrate the increased utility of the MDC for the detection of contouring errors.

[1]  Ajl Harrison,et al.  Technical overview of geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy , 2003 .

[2]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  J J W Lagendijk,et al.  A novel method for comparing 3D target volume delineations in radiotherapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Eric Berthelet,et al.  Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Florence H. Sheehan,et al.  Performance of User Independent Echocardiographic Border Detection Algorithm: Comparison with Human Observer Variability , 2005, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  Georges Noël,et al.  Conformity index: a review. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate contouring uncertainty in megavoltage computed tomography images acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit during image-guided radiation therapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M van Herk,et al.  A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  R Jena,et al.  Titanium clip placement to allow accurate tumour bed localisation following breast conserving surgery: audit on behalf of the IMPORT Trial Management Group. , 2008, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  Jean-Jacques Mazeron,et al.  Index de conformation et radiothérapie , 2004 .

[11]  F Lliso,et al.  Organ contouring for prostate cancer: interobserver and internal organ motion variability. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[12]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Yueh-Yun Chi,et al.  Comparison of human and automatic segmentations of kidneys from CT images. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Reduction of observer variation using matched CT-PET for lung cancer delineation: a three-dimensional analysis. , 2006, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.