Clinical utility of an epigenetic assay to detect occult prostate cancer in histopathologically negative biopsies: results of the MATLOC study.

PURPOSE Concern about possible false-negative prostate biopsy histopathology findings often leads to rebiopsy. A quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction assay panel, including GSTP1, APC and RASSF1, could increase the sensitivity of detecting cancer over that of pathological review alone, leading to a high negative predictive value and a decrease in unnecessary repeat biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The MATLOC study blindly tested archived prostate biopsy needle core tissue samples of 498 subjects from the United Kingdom and Belgium with histopathologically negative prostate biopsies, followed by positive (cases) or negative (controls) repeat biopsy within 30 months. Clinical performance of the epigenetic marker panel, emphasizing negative predictive value, was assessed and cross-validated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate all risk factors. RESULTS The epigenetic assay performed on the first negative biopsies of this retrospective review cohort resulted in a negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI 87-93). In a multivariate model correcting for patient age, prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and first biopsy histopathological characteristics the epigenetic assay was a significant independent predictor of patient outcome (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.81-5.53). CONCLUSIONS A multiplex quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction assay determining the methylation status of GSTP1, APC and RASSF1 was strongly associated with repeat biopsy outcome up to 30 months after initial negative biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer. Adding this epigenetic assay could improve the prostate cancer diagnostic process and decrease unnecessary repeat biopsies.

[1]  J. Patard,et al.  Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. , 2009, European urology.

[2]  J. Epstein,et al.  Optimal Use of a Panel of Methylation Markers with GSTP1 Hypermethylation in the Diagnosis of Prostate Adenocarcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan,et al.  Evidence for field cancerization of the prostate , 2009, The Prostate.

[4]  F. Latif,et al.  Role of the Ras-association domain family 1 tumor suppressor gene in human cancers. , 2005, Cancer research.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  R. Autorino,et al.  Are extended biopsies really necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? , 2003, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[7]  J. Epstein,et al.  Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy , 1999 .

[8]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[9]  R. Ablin A retrospective and prospective overview of prostate-specific antigen , 1997, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[10]  H Ballentine Carter,et al.  Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[11]  B. Trock,et al.  Evaluation of GSTP1 and APC methylation as indicators for repeat biopsy in a high‐risk cohort of men with negative initial prostate biopsies , 2012, BJU international.

[12]  J. Herman,et al.  The Epigenetic promise for prostate cancer diagnosis , 2012, The Prostate.

[13]  K. Chevli,et al.  Use of PCA3 in detecting prostate cancer in initial and repeat prostate biopsy patients , 2013, The Prostate.

[14]  Mesut Remzi,et al.  Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: Results of the prospective European prostate cancer detection study , 2001, The Prostate.

[15]  J. Gillespie,et al.  Gene promoter methylation in prostate tumor-associated stromal cells. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  Jason Fine,et al.  Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[17]  C C Schulman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Roobol,et al.  Infectious complications and hospital admissions after prostate biopsy in a European randomized trial. , 2012, European urology.

[19]  Robert E. Brown,et al.  Field effect in cancer-an update. , 2009, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[20]  D. Sidransky,et al.  Quantitation of GSTP1 methylation in non-neoplastic prostatic tissue and organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  J. Epstein,et al.  Quantitative GSTP1 methylation levels correlate with Gleason grade and tumor volume in prostate needle biopsies. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[22]  M. Lucia,et al.  Prostate Cancer Detected by Methylated Gene Markers in Histopathologically Cancer-Negative Tissues from Men with Subsequent Positive Biopsies , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[23]  J. Epstein,et al.  A tissue biopsy-based epigenetic multiplex PCR assay for prostate cancer detection , 2012, BMC Urology.

[24]  M. Hoque,et al.  A Quantitative Promoter Methylation Profile of Prostate Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  A. D. De Marzo,et al.  GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation as a molecular biomarker for prostate cancer , 2004, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  D. Ornstein,et al.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[27]  A. Mazumder,et al.  Quantitative, spatial resolution of the epigenetic field effect in prostate cancer , 2008, The Prostate.

[28]  J. Epstein,et al.  Quantitative GSTP1 methylation clearly distinguishes benign prostatic tissue and limited prostate adenocarcinoma. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[29]  A. Wellmann,et al.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Information in Prostate Cancer with the Help of a Small Set of Hypermethylated Gene Loci , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.