Monte Carlo track structure studies of energy deposition and calculation of initial DSB and RBE.

Estimation of exposure due to environmental and other sources of radiations of high-LET and low-LET is of interest in radiobiology and radiation protection for risk assessment. To account for the differences in effectiveness of different types of radiations various parameters have been used. However, the relative inadequacy of the commonly used parameters, including dose, fluence, linear energy transfer, lineal energy, specific energy and quality factor, has been made manifest by the biological importance of the microscopic track structure and primary modes of interaction. Monte Carlo track structure simulations have been used to calculate the frequency of energy deposition by radiations of high- and low-LET in target sizes similar to DNA and higher order genomic structure. Tracks of monoenergetic heavy ions and electrons were constructed by following the molecular interaction-by-interaction histories of the particles down to 10 eV. Subsequently, geometrical models of these assumed biological targets were randomly exposed to the radiation tracks and the frequency of energy depositions obtained were normalized to unit dose in unit density liquid water (l0(3) kg m-3). From these data and a more sophisticated model of the DNA, absolute yields of both single- and double-strand breaks expressed in number of breaks per dalton per Gray were obtained and compared with the measured yields. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for energy depositions in cylindrical targets has been calculated using 100 keV electrons as the reference radiation assuming the electron track-ends contribution is similar to that in 250 kV X-ray or Co60 gamma-ray irradiations.

[1]  A. Kellerer Chord-Length Distributions and Related Quantities for Spheroids , 1984 .

[2]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by ultrasoft Al (K) and C (K) X-rays. , 1980, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[3]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of nucleotide crystal hydrates and their counter-ions. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Effectiveness of 1.5 keV aluminium K and 0.3 keV carbon K characteristic X-rays at inducing DNA double-strand breaks in yeast cells. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[5]  D. Lea Actions of radiations on living cells. , 1955 .

[6]  W. E. Wilson,et al.  Calculation of Distributions for Energy Imparted and Ionization by Fast Protons in Nanometer Sites , 1981 .

[7]  J. Ward,et al.  DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. , 1988, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[8]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Energy deposition in small cylindrical targets by monoenergetic electrons. , 1991, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Energy deposition in small cylindrical targets by ultrasoft x-rays. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells by aluminium characteristic ultrasoft X-rays. II. Dose-responses of Chinese hamster and human diploid cells to aluminium X-rays and radiations of different LET. , 1977, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[11]  W. E. Wilson,et al.  The Deposition of Energy in Small Cylindrical Targets by High LET Radiations , 1985 .

[12]  H. Berendsen,et al.  A Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation of an Eight‐Base‐Pair DNA Fragment in Aqueous Solution: Comparison with Experimental Two‐Dimensional NMR Data a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P HOWARD-FLANDERS,et al.  Physical and chemical mechanisms in the injury of cells of ionizing radiations. , 1958, Advances in biological and medical physics.

[14]  W. Szybalski,et al.  GENETICS OF HUMAN CELL LINES III. INCORPORATION OF 5-BROMO- AND 5-IODODEOXYHRIDINE INTO THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF HUMAN CELLS AND ITS EFFECT ON RADIATION SENSITIVITY , 1960 .

[15]  R. J. Preston,et al.  Chromosome aberrations and the theory of RBE. 3. Evidence from experiments with soft x-rays, and a consideration of the effects of hard x-rays. , 1967, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[16]  M. Zaider,et al.  Inactivation of synchronized mammalian cells with low-energy X rays--results and significance. , 1987, Radiation research.

[17]  D. Goodhead,et al.  The induction of chromosome exchange aberrations by carbon ultrasoft X-rays in V79 hamster cells. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[18]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays. I. Cultured hamster cells (V79). , 1987, Radiation research.

[19]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Effectiveness of 0.3 keV carbon ultrasoft X-rays for the inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells. , 1979, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[20]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Is selective absorption of ultrasoft x-rays biologically important in mammalian cells? , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Estimation of a single property of low LET radiations which correlates with biological effectiveness. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J. Ward Mechanisms of Radiation Action on DNA in Model Systems - Their Relevance to Cellular DNA , 1991 .