Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations' Facebook Sites

Comments posted to news sites do not always live up to the ideals of deliberative theorists. Drawing from theories about deliberation and group norms, this study investigates whether news organizations can affect comment section norms by engaging directly with commenters. We conducted a field study with a local television station in a top-50 Designated Market Area. For 70 political posts made on different days, we randomized whether an unidentified staff member from the station, a recognizable political reporter, or no one engaged with commenters. We assessed if these changes affected whether the comments (n = 2,403) were civil, were relevant, contained genuine questions, and provided evidence. The findings indicate that a news organization can affect the deliberative behavior of commenters.

[1]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages , 2003, New Media Soc..

[2]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[3]  Gi Woong Yun,et al.  Selective Moderation, Selective Responding, and Balkanization of the Blogosphere: A Field Experiment , 2013 .

[4]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers , 2011 .

[5]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Coherence in political computer-mediated communication: analyzing topic relevance and drift in chat , 2009 .

[6]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms , 2006 .

[7]  James N. Druckman,et al.  On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  R. Cialdini.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .

[9]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Strategic Uses of Social Technology: A SIDE look at computer-mediated interaction , 2011 .

[10]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme , 2007, Regular Issue.

[11]  Tom Postmes,et al.  A SIDE look at computer-mediated interaction: Power and the gender divide , 2011 .

[12]  Kevin Wise,et al.  Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Rui Shi,et al.  Effects of Online Comments on Smokers' Perception of Antismoking Public Service Announcements , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  H. Aarts,et al.  The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[16]  M. Sherif.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[17]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  A field experiment testing frontline opinion leaders as change agents. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  J. Cappella,et al.  Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000 , 2002 .

[19]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  That's Not the Way It Is: How User-Generated Comments on the News Affect Perceived Media Bias , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  David Domingo,et al.  Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: dealing with an uncomfortable myth , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[22]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  An Explication of Social Norms , 2005 .

[23]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Towards quality discourse in online news comments , 2011, CSCW.

[24]  J. Brian Houston,et al.  Influence of User Comments on Perceptions of Media Bias and Third-Person Effect in Online News , 2011 .

[25]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[26]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[27]  Jennifer Gibbs,et al.  Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[29]  Brad J. Sagarin,et al.  Managing social norms for persuasive impact , 2006 .

[30]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[31]  Mark Cenite,et al.  Recommendations for Hosting Audience Comments Based on Discourse Ethics , 2010 .

[32]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  D. Marchionni.  Online Story Commenting , 2015 .

[34]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments , 2014 .

[35]  J. Berry,et al.  From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News , 2011 .

[36]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[37]  Neil Thurman,et al.  A CLASH OF CULTURES , 2008 .

[38]  Arthur D. Santana.  Online Readers' Comments Represent New Opinion Pipeline , 2011 .

[39]  Russell Spears,et al.  Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness , 2007 .

[40]  Arthur D. Santana.  Virtuous or Vitriolic , 2014 .

[41]  Deen Freelon,et al.  Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion , 2015, New Media Soc..

[42]  Carolyn E. Nielsen,et al.  Newspaper Journalists Support Online Comments , 2012 .

[43]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Normative influences on thoughtful online participation , 2011, CHI.

[44]  R. Davidson,et al.  Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen so Much More than Their Congress , 1979 .

[45]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[46]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion , 2005 .