Inducing self-selected human engagement in robotic locomotion training

Stroke leads to severe mobility impairments for millions of individuals each year. Functional outcomes can be improved through manual treadmill therapy, but high costs limit patient exposure and, thereby, outcomes. Robotic gait training could increase the viable duration and frequency of training sessions, but robotic approaches employed thus far have been less effective than manual therapy. These shortcomings may relate to subconscious energy-minimizing drives, which might cause patients to engage less actively in therapy when provided with corrective robotic assistance. We have devised a new method for gait rehabilitation that harnesses, rather than fights, least-effort tendencies. Therapeutic goals, such as increased use of the paretic limb, are made easier than the patient's nominal gait through selective assistance from a robotic platform. We performed a pilot test on a healthy subject (N = 1) in which altered self-selected stride length was induced using a tethered robotic ankle-foot orthosis. The subject first walked on a treadmill while wearing the orthosis with and without assistance at unaltered and voluntarily altered stride length. Voluntarily increasing stride length by 5% increased metabolic energy cost by 4%. Robotic assistance decreased energy cost at both unaltered and voluntarily increased stride lengths, by 6% and 8% respectively. We then performed a test in which the robotic system continually monitored stride length and provided more assistance if the subject's stride length approached a target increase. This adaptive assistance protocol caused the subject to slowly adjust their gait patterns towards the target, leading to a 4% increase in stride length. Metabolic energy consumption was simultaneously reduced by 5%. These results suggest that selective-assistance protocols based on targets relevant to rehabilitation might lead patients to self-select desirable gait patterns during robotic gait training sessions, possibly facilitating better adherence and outcomes.

[1]  Rodolfo Margaria,et al.  Biomechanics and Energetics of Muscular Exercise , 1976 .

[2]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[3]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait Assessment for Neurologically Impaired Patients , 1986 .

[4]  J. Brockway Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. , 1987, Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition.

[5]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[6]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. , 1989, Physiological reviews.

[7]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[8]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[9]  L. Dias,et al.  Energy expenditure in children with lumbosacral myelomeningocele what's the cost of walking? , 1997 .

[10]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Body weight-supported treadmill training after stroke , 2001, Current atherosclerosis reports.

[13]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  A. Ruina,et al.  Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  M. Morari,et al.  Robotic Orthosis Lokomat: A Rehabilitation and Research Tool , 2003, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[16]  C. Detrembleur,et al.  Energy cost, mechanical work, and efficiency of hemiparetic walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[17]  C. W. Radcliffe,et al.  Predicting metabolic cost of level walking , 1978, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[18]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Relative Importance of Rehabilitation Therapy Characteristics on Functional Outcomes for Persons With Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[19]  H. Ralston Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking , 1958, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[20]  G.S. Sawicki,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses: applications in motor adaptation and rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[21]  R. Teasell,et al.  What's new in stroke rehabilitation: back to basics. , 2005, Stroke.

[22]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. , 2005, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[23]  J.A. Galvez,et al.  Measuring human trainers' skill for the design of better robot control algorithms for gait training after spinal cord injury , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[24]  S. Greene Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled trial , 2006 .

[25]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  D. Labarthe,et al.  Prevalence of stroke--United States, 2005. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[27]  Monica A. Daley,et al.  A Physiologist's Perspective on Robotic Exoskeletons for Human Locomotion , 2007, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[28]  J. Veneman Design and evaluation of the gait rehabilitation robot LOPES , 2007 .

[29]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[30]  R. Kram,et al.  The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  BrittaHusemann,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke , 2007 .

[32]  H. Thieme Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008 .

[33]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[34]  V. Dietz,et al.  Computerized Visual Feedback: An Adjunct to Robotic-Assisted Gait Training , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[35]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Slacking by the human motor system: Computational models and implications for robotic orthoses , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[36]  D. Reisman,et al.  Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation Transfers to Overground Walking in Persons Poststroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Novel Robot for Ankle Rehabilitation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[38]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A Highly Backdrivable, Lightweight Knee Actuator for Investigating Gait in Stroke , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[39]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[40]  Steven H Collins,et al.  Dynamic arm swinging in human walking , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  S. Collins,et al.  Recycling Energy to Restore Impaired Ankle Function during Human Walking , 2010, PloS one.

[42]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration , 2010 .

[43]  C. Detrembleur,et al.  Reducing the Energy Cost of Hemiparetic Gait Using Center of Mass Feedback: A Pilot Study , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  R. Motl,et al.  Energetic optimization during over-ground walking in people with and without Down syndrome. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[45]  Mark Snaterse,et al.  Distinct fast and slow processes contribute to the selection of preferred step frequency during human walking. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[46]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  A Fundamental Linear Systems Conflict Between Performance and Passivity in Haptic Rendering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[47]  L. Mertz,et al.  The Next Generation of Exoskeletons: Lighter, Cheaper Devices Are in the Works , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[48]  S. Collins,et al.  Targeting specific muscles for rehabilitation with an EMG-controlled ankle-foot orthosis , 2012 .

[49]  Shawn M O'Connor,et al.  Fast visual prediction and slow optimization of preferred walking speed. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Prevalence of stroke--United States, 2006-2010. , 2012, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[51]  Steven H. Collins,et al.  An experimental robotic testbed for accelerated development of ankle prostheses , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.