Does the Cerebellum Implement or Select Geometries? A Speculative Note

During evolution, living systems, actively interacting with their environment, developed the ability, through sensorimotor contingencies, to construct functional spaces shaping their perception and their movements. These geometries were modularly embedded in specific functional neuro-architectures. In particular, human movements were shown to obey several empirical laws, such as the 2/3 power law, isochrony, or jerk minimization principles, which constrain and adapt motor planning and execution. Outstandingly, such laws can be deduced from a combination of Euclidean, affine, and equi-affine geometries, whose neural correlates have been partly detected in several brain areas including the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. Reviving Pellionisz and Llinas general hypothesis regarding the cerebrum and the cerebellum as geometric machines, we speculate that the cerebellum should be involved in implementing and/or selecting task-specific geometries for motor and cognitive skills. More precisely, the cerebellum is assumed to compute forward internal models to help specific cortical and subcortical regions to select appropriate geometries among, at least, Euclidean and affine geometries. We emphasize that the geometrical role of the cerebellum deserves a renewal of interest, which may provide a better understanding of its specific contributions to motor and associative (cognitive) functions.

[1]  C. Habas,et al.  The Cerebellar Thalamus , 2019, The Cerebellum.

[2]  Alexander V. Terekhov,et al.  Space as an invention of biological organisms , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: Evidence for action-perception coupling , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Graziano Is Reaching Eye-Centered, Body-Centered, Hand-Centered, or a Combination? , 2001, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[5]  David Bodznick,et al.  Evidence for generative homology of cerebellum and cerebellum‐like structures in an elasmobranch fish based on Pax6, Cbln1 and Grid2 expression , 2018, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Arseny A. Sokolov,et al.  Biological motion processing: The left cerebellum communicates with the right superior temporal sulcus , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Movement Timing and Invariance Arise from Several Geometries , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel,et al.  Cerebellar Contribution to Preparatory Activity in Motor Neocortex , 2018, Neuron.

[9]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Several Geometries for Movements Generations , 2017, Geometric and Numerical Foundations of Movements.

[10]  Laure Rondi-Reig,et al.  A hippocampo-cerebellar centred network for the learning and execution of sequence-based navigation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Cerebellum estimates the sensory state of the body , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Computation of Egomotion in the Macaque Cerebellar Vermis , 2010, The Cerebellum.

[13]  David Bodznick,et al.  Functional origins of the vertebrate cerebellum from a sensory processing antecedent , 2010 .

[14]  P. Viviani,et al.  A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Amari,et al.  Sensori-motor transformations in the brain (with a critique of the tensor theory of cerebellum). , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Andreea C. Bostan,et al.  Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Eric J. Lang,et al.  Coordination of Reaching Movements , 2016 .

[18]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  Is There Something Out There? Inferring Space from Sensorimotor Dependencies , 2003, Neural Computation.

[19]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[20]  Bruno Gas,et al.  Discovering space - Grounding spatial topology and metric regularity in a naive agent's sensorimotor experience , 2018, Neural Networks.

[21]  N. Sawtell,et al.  Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  Tatyana A. Yakusheva,et al.  Searching for an Internal Representation of Stimulus Kinematics in the Response of Ventral Paraflocculus Purkinje Cells , 2017, The Cerebellum.

[23]  Giselle Weiss,et al.  Simplexity: Simplifying Principles for a Complex World , 2012 .

[24]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Relationship between Complex and Simple Spike Activity in Macaque Caudal Vermis during Three-Dimensional Vestibular Stimulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Eran Stark,et al.  Parabolic movement primitives and cortical states: merging optimality with geometric invariance , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Gavan P. McNally,et al.  Visualizing Infralimbic Control over Incubation of Cocaine Craving , 2019, Neuron.

[27]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Interaction Between Hippocampus and Cerebellum Crus I in Sequence-Based but not Place-Based Navigation. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Cerebellar activation during discrete and not continuous timed movements: An fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Spectrum of power laws for curved hand movements , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Michael N. Economo,et al.  A cortico-cerebellar loop for motor planning , 2018, Nature.

[31]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Cerebellar engagement in an action observation network. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  John L. Bell,et al.  Toposes and local set theories - an introduction , 1988 .

[33]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[34]  A. Pellionisz,et al.  Tensor network theory of the metaorganization of functional geometries in the central nervous system , 1985, Neuroscience.

[35]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Timing of continuous motor imagery: the two-thirds power law originates in trajectory planning. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Computational approaches to motor control , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  J. Koenderink The brain a geometry engine , 1990, Psychological research.

[38]  Zengcai V. Guo,et al.  Maintenance of persistent activity in a frontal thalamocortical loop , 2017, Nature.

[39]  Mario-Ubaldo Manto,et al.  Clinical signs of cerebellar disorders , 2001 .

[40]  Sisir Roy,et al.  Dynamic geometry, brain function modeling, and consciousness. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[41]  Jean Petitot La neige est blanche ssi... Prédication et perception , 1997 .

[42]  Nathaniel B Sawtell,et al.  Neural mechanisms for filtering self-generated sensory signals in cerebellum-like circuits , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  A. Pellionisz,et al.  Space-time representation in the brain. The cerebellum as a predictive space-time metric tensor , 1982, Neuroscience.

[44]  Eric J. Lang Chapter 9 – Coordination of Reaching Movements: Cerebellar Interactions with Motor Cortex , 2016 .

[45]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Models of human movement: Trajectory planning and inverse kinematics studies , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[46]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  Geometric and Numerical Foundations of Movements , 2017, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[47]  Matt Gaidica,et al.  Distinct Populations of Motor Thalamic Neurons Encode Action Initiation, Action Selection, and Movement Vigor , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Izawa,et al.  The cerebro-cerebellum: Could it be loci of forward models? , 2016, Neuroscience Research.

[49]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[50]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Motor Compositionality and Timing: Combined Geometrical and Optimization Approaches , 2018, Biomechanics of Anthropomorphic Systems.

[51]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Affine differential geometry analysis of human arm movements , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[53]  Daniel Bennequin,et al.  Geometrical Invariance and Smoothness Maximization for Task-Space Movement Generation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[54]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.