Evaluation of P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface in Real-World Contexts

Despite recent advances in brain-computer interface (BCI) development, system usability still remains a large oversight. The goal of this study was to investigate the usability of a P300-based BCI system, P300 Speller, by assessing how background noise and interface color contrast affect user performance and BCI usage preference. Fifteen able-bodied participants underwent a 2 (low and high interface color contrast) × 3 (low, medium, and high background noise level) within-subjects design experiment, in which participants were asked to type six 10-character phrases in the P300 Speller paradigm. The overall accuracy in the study was 80.2%. Participants showed higher accuracy, higher information transfer rate, bigger amplitude, and smaller latency in the high interface color contrast condition than in the low contrast condition. Participants had better performance in the noisy condition than in the quiet condition, but the background noise effects were not statistically significant in the present study. These results should give some insight to the real-world applicability of the current P300 Speller as a nonmuscular communication system, especially for individuals with severe neuromuscular disabilities.

[1]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  John Polich,et al.  P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[3]  F. Babiloni,et al.  The Estimation of Cortical Activity for Brain-Computer Interface: Applications in a Domotic Context , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[4]  Yoshio Hirayasu,et al.  Sex effects on rate of change of P300 latency with age , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Melody Moore Jackson,et al.  BioGauges: Toward More Objective Evaluation of Biometrically-Based Interfaces , 2007 .

[6]  Dana Chisnell,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing , 2009 .

[7]  F. Piccione,et al.  P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Donchin,et al.  The contingent negative variation and the late positive wave of the average evoked potential. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface research at the university of south Florida cognitive psychophysiology laboratory: the P300 speller , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Lei Ding,et al.  Motor imagery classification by means of source analysis for brain–computer interface applications , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  E Gordon,et al.  The effects of age on auditory event-related potentials. , 1991, Experimental aging research.

[13]  Ashley Craig,et al.  Brain–Computer Interface—FES Integration: Towards a Hands‐free Neuroprosthesis Command System , 2004, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[14]  M. Onofrj,et al.  Reappearance of event-related P3 potential in locked-in syndrome. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  J. Polich,et al.  Frequency, Intensity, and Duration as Determinants of P300 from Auditory Stimuli , 1989, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[16]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Relationship between stimulus intensity and the P300. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[17]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Brain-computer interface in multimedia communication , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[19]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  John Polich,et al.  P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Masud Mansuripur,et al.  Introduction to information theory , 1986 .

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  Bisensory stimulation: inferring decision-related processes from P300 component. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Christa Neuper,et al.  An asynchronously controlled EEG-based virtual keyboard: improvement of the spelling rate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  The thought translation device: a neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Definition, Identification, and Reliability of Measurement of the P300 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 1987 .

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  B. O’Donnell,et al.  Active and passive P3 latency and psychometric performance: influence of age and individual differences. , 1992, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Hidden Markov models for online classification of single trial EEG data , 2001, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[32]  Fazlollah M. Reza,et al.  Introduction to Information Theory , 2004, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering.

[33]  J. Cohen,et al.  P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[34]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[35]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  An improved P300-based brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  E Donchin,et al.  The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[37]  Sean J. O'Connor,et al.  P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations , 2005, Brain Topography.

[38]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  H. Flor,et al.  The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[40]  T R Bashore,et al.  The algorithmic complexity of multichannel EEGs is sensitive to changes in behavior. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[41]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[42]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  THE P300 AS A TYPING TOOL: TESTS OF BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE WITH AN ALS PATIENT , 2000 .

[43]  J. Covington,et al.  P300, stimulus intensity, and modality. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface , 2005, Neurology.

[45]  B.Z. Allison,et al.  ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in a visual detection task. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.