Understanding the Impact of the Doping Profiles on Selective Emitter Solar Cell by Two-Dimensional Numerical Simulation

The selective emitter (SE) design, featuring lower doped areas between the front contact fingers and higher doped areas underneath the front metallization, is crucial to improve the performance at the front side of a monocrystalline (c-Si) silicon solar cell. One of the most interesting and promising low-cost SE process consists of the screen printing of a phosphorus-doped paste, allowing a separate optimization of the doping profiles in the metallized and nonmetallized front-side areas. By referring to this kind of process, this paper presents a simulation study with a decoupled analysis on the effect of the lowly doped and highly doped profiles on the performance of an SE solar cell, by means of 2-D electro-optical numerical device simulations. Moreover, by exploiting the 2-D modeling, the effect of the alignment tolerance used in the SE diffusion process for the subsequent metallization process has been also investigated. Numerical results show that the adoption of an optimized design for the SE cell can lead to an efficiency improvement above 0.4%abs compared with the 75 Ω/sq homogeneous emitter reference cell.

[1]  N. Stem,et al.  Physical limitations for homogeneous and highly doped n-type emitter monocrystalline silicon solar cells , 2004 .

[2]  Andreas Schenk,et al.  Finite-temperature full random-phase approximation model of band gap narrowing for silicon device simulation , 1998 .

[3]  D. Tonini,et al.  Understanding the impact of double screen-printing on silicon solar cells by 2-D numerical simulations , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[4]  A. Goetzberger,et al.  Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells , 1998 .

[5]  P. Vinod.  SEM and specific contact resistance analysis of screen-printed Ag contacts formed by fire-through process on the shallow emitters of silicon solar cell , 2009 .

[6]  Andreas Wolf,et al.  Influence of doping profile of highly doped regions for selective emitter solar cells , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[7]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Minority carrier lifetime degradation in boron-doped Czochralski silicon , 2001 .

[8]  Stefan W. Glunz,et al.  Fine line printed silicon solar cells exceeding 20% efficiency , 2008 .

[9]  Tonio Buonassisi,et al.  Predictive Modeling of the Optimal Phosphorus Diffusion Profile in Silicon Solar Cells , 2009 .

[10]  G. Hahn.  Status of Selective Emitter Technology , 2010 .

[11]  Yang Yang,et al.  Highly Predictive Modelling of Entire Si Solar Cells for Industrial Applications , 2009 .

[12]  D. Schroder,et al.  Solar cell contact resistance—A review , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[13]  C. Fiegna,et al.  Open issues for the numerical simulation of silicon solar cells , 2011, Ulis 2011 Ultimate Integration on Silicon.

[14]  Giso Hahn,et al.  Two Diffusion Step Selective Emitter : Comparison of Mask Opening by Laser or Etching Paste , 2008 .

[15]  G. Schubert,et al.  ON THE MECHANISM BEHIND THE BENEFICIAL EFFECT OF A FORMING GAS ANNEAL ON SOLAR CELLS WITH SILVER THICK FILM CONTACTS , 2006 .

[16]  P. Altermatt,et al.  Reassessment of the intrinsic carrier density in crystalline silicon in view of band-gap narrowing , 2003 .

[17]  Nobili,et al.  Dopant and carrier concentration in Si in equilibrium with monoclinic SiP precipitates. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  Andreas Wolf,et al.  Modelling carrier recombination in highly phosphorus-doped industrial emitters , 2011 .

[19]  Understanding and Development of Ag Pastes for Silicon Solar Cells with High Sheet-Resistance Emitters , 2004 .

[20]  D. Klaassen.  A unified mobility model for device simulation , 1990, International Technical Digest on Electron Devices.

[21]  S. Asher,et al.  Development of screen-printed silicon solar cells with high fill factors on 100 /spl Omega//sq emitters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[22]  Stefan Kontermann.  Characterization and modeling of contacting crystalline silicon solar cells , 2009 .

[23]  J. Cotter,et al.  Screen‐print selective diffusions for high‐efficiency industrial silicon solar cells , 2008 .

[24]  D. Tonini,et al.  2-D Numerical analysis of the impact of the highly-doped profile on selective emitter solar cell performance , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[25]  P. Grabitz,et al.  0.4% absolute efficiency gain of industrial solar cells by laser doped selective emitter , 2009, 2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[26]  Andres Cuevas,et al.  Co-optimisation of the Emitter Region and the Metal Grid of Silicon Solar Cells , 2000 .

[27]  D.B.M. Klaassen,et al.  A unified mobility model for device simulation—I. Model equations and concentration dependence , 1992 .

[28]  C. Fiegna,et al.  2-D numerical simulation and modeling of monocrystalline selective emitter solar cells , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[29]  Pietro P. Altermatt,et al.  Models for numerical device simulations of crystalline silicon solar cells—a review , 2011 .

[30]  R. Brendel,et al.  Towards 20% efficient large‐area screen‐printed rear‐passivated silicon solar cells , 2012 .

[31]  A. Mette,et al.  High efficiency silicon solar cells with ink jetted seed and plated grid on high sheet resistance emitter , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[32]  G. Hahn,et al.  The development of etch-back processes for industrial silicon solar cells , 2010 .