Association Between Aneurysm Shoulder Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study

Background—Aneurysm expansion rate is an important indicator of the potential risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. Stress within the AAA wall is also thought to be a trigger for its rupture. However, the association between aneurysm wall stresses and expansion of AAA is unclear. Methods and Results—Forty-four patients with AAAs were included in this longitudinal follow-up study. They were assessed by serial abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography scans if a critical size was reached or a rapid expansion occurred. Patient-specific 3-dimensional AAA geometries were reconstructed from the follow-up computed tomography images. Structural analysis was performed to calculate the wall stresses of the AAA models at both baseline and final visit. A nonlinear large-strain finite element method was used to compute the wall-stress distribution. The relationship between wall stresses and expansion rate was investigated. Slowly and rapidly expanding aneurysms had comparable baseline maximum diameters (median, 4.35 cm [interquartile range, 4.12 to 5.0 cm] versus 4.6 cm [interquartile range, 4.2 to 5.0 cm]; P 0.32). Rapidly expanding AAAs had significantly higher shoulder stresses than slowly expanding AAAs (median, 300 kPa [interquartile range, 280 to 320 kPa] versus 225 kPa [interquartile range, 211 to 249 kPa]; P 0.0001). A good correlation between shoulder stress at baseline and expansion rate was found (r 0.71; P 0.0001). Conclusion—A higher shoulder stress was found to have an association with a rapidly expanding AAA. Therefore, it may be useful for estimating the expansion of AAAs and improve risk stratification of patients with AAAs. (Circulation. 2010;122:1815-1822.)

[1]  J. Powell,et al.  Final 12‐year follow‐up of Surgery versus Surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  J. Golledge,et al.  Atvb in Focus Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Pathogenesis and Implications for Management , 2022 .

[3]  Martin J Graves,et al.  Structural analysis and magnetic resonance imaging predict plaque vulnerability: a study comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  D A Vorp,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[6]  R. Gillum,et al.  Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  S. Anand,et al.  Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2002, Vascular medicine.

[9]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  The Impact of Calcification on the Biomechanical Stability of Atherosclerotic Plaques , 2001, Circulation.

[10]  B J B M Wolters,et al.  A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  E. Bluth,et al.  Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II: Wall stresses and their implication for in vivo thrombosis and rupture. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  Alexander D. Shkolnik,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[13]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Effect of Variation in Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Properties on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  F J Schoen,et al.  Circumferential stress and matrix metalloproteinase 1 in human coronary atherosclerosis. Implications for plaque rupture. , 1996, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[17]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  R G Stringfellow,et al.  The influence of aorta-aneurysm geometry upon stress in the aneurysm wall. , 1987, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  M M Thompson,et al.  A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2005, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[21]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  Martin J Graves,et al.  Stress analysis of carotid plaque rupture based on in vivo high resolution MRI. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  J. Collin.  The Oxford Screening Program for Aortic Aneurysm and Screening First‐Order Male Siblings of Probands with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Budwig,et al.  Steady flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Chad Johnson,et al.  Uniaxial strain upregulates matrix-degrading enzymes produced by human vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[27]  R Fumero,et al.  Biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 1993, European journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  Simon G. Thompson,et al.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: Risk Factors and Time Intervals for Surveillance , 2004, Circulation.

[29]  S. Glagov,et al.  Mechanical determinants of plaque modeling, remodeling and disruption. , 1997, Atherosclerosis.

[30]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  How Critical Is Fibrous Cap Thickness to Carotid Plaque Stability?: A Flow–Plaque Interaction Model , 2006, Stroke.

[31]  R. J. Valentine,et al.  Watchful waiting in cases of small abdominal aortic aneurysms- appropriate for all patients? , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  J. Gillard,et al.  Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[33]  Barbara Reggiani,et al.  Finite-Element Modeling of Bones From CT Data: Sensitivity to Geometry and Material Uncertainties , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[35]  C. Yuan,et al.  Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[36]  P. Libby,et al.  Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.