Seismic Moment from Regional Surface-Wave Amplitudes: Applications to Digital and Analog Seismograms

Accurate, consistent earthquake size estimates are fundamental for seismic hazard evaluation. In central Europe, seismic activity is low and long-term seismicity, available as intensities from written historical records, has to be included for meaningful assessments. We determined seismic moments M 0 of 25 stronger twentieth-century events in Switzerland from surface-wave amplitude measurements. These M 0 can be used to calibrate intensity-moment relations applicable to preinstrumental data. We derived the amplitude-moment relation using digital data from 18 earthquakes in and near Switzerland where independent M 0 estimates exist. The surface-wave amplitudes were measured at empirically determined distance varying reference periods T Δ . For amplitudes measured at T Δ , the distance attenuation term of the surface-wave magnitude relation S (Δ) = log ( A / T ) max + 1.66 log Δ is independent of distance. For log M 0 = M S + C E , we get log M 0 = S (Δ) + 14.90. Uncertainties of ±0.3 for the 14.90-constant correspond to a factor of 2 M 0 uncertainty, which was verified with independent data. Our relation allows fast, direct M 0 determination for current earthquakes, and after recalibration of the constant, the relation can be applied anywhere. We applied our relation to analog seismograms from early-instrumental earthquakes in Switzerland that were collected from several European observatories. Amplitude measurements from scans were performed at large amplifications and corrected for differences between T Δ and actual measurement periods. The resulting magnitudes range from M w = 4.6 to 5.8 for the largest earthquake in Switzerland during the twentieth century. Uncertainties for the early-instrumental events are on the order of 0.4 magnitude units. Online material : Moment-tensor analysis of 14 recent earthquakes.

[1]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Homogeneous Moment-Magnitude Calibration in Switzerland , 2005 .

[2]  N. Ambraseys REAPPRAISAL OF MAGNITUDE OF 20TH CENTURY EARTHQUAKES IN SWITZERLAND , 2003 .

[3]  J. Morales,et al.  Moment tensor solutions for small and moderate earthquakes in the Ibero‐Maghreb region , 2003 .

[4]  Martin J. Siegert,et al.  EOS Trans. AGU , 2003 .

[5]  Donat Fäh,et al.  Earthquake Catalogue of Switzerland (ECOS) and the Related Macroseismic Database , 2003 .

[6]  Manfred Baer,et al.  Regional moment tensor determination in the European–Mediterranean area — initial results , 2002 .

[7]  J. Ritter On the recording characteristics of the original Wiechert seismographs at Göttingen (Germany) , 2002 .

[8]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  European–Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997–2000 , 2002 .

[9]  J. Braunmiller Moment Tensor Solutions of Stronger Earthquakes in Germany with GRSN Data , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Mar. Korn Ten years of German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) , 2002 .

[11]  D. Giardini,et al.  Earthquakes in Switzerland and surrounding regions during 2005 , 2006 .

[12]  J. Douglas,et al.  Reappraisal of surface wave magnitudes in the Eastern Mediterranean region and the Middle East , 2000 .

[13]  I. Allegretti,et al.  Consistency of Magnitudes of the Largest Earthquakes of the First Half of the 20TH Century Determined on the Basis of Göttingen and Zagreb Wiechert Seismograms , 2000 .

[14]  Mehdi Rezapour,et al.  Bias in surface-wave magnitude Ms due to inadequate distance corrections , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Matthew Free,et al.  SURFACE-WAVE MAGNITUDE CALIBRATION FOR EUROPEAN REGION EARTHQUAKES , 1997 .

[16]  R. E. Abercrombie Regional bias in estimates of earthquake Ms due to surface-wave path effects: Bulletin - Seismological Society of America, 84 (2), 1994, pp 377–382 , 1994 .

[17]  M. Herak,et al.  Distance dependence of Ms and calibrating function for 20 second Rayleigh waves , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  Structural and rheological implications of lower-crustal earthquakes below northern Switzerland , 1992 .

[19]  G. Panza,et al.  Gutenberg's surface-wave magnitude calibrating function: Theoretical basis from synthetic seismograms , 1989 .

[20]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Evidence of bias in estimations of earthquake size , 1988, Nature.

[21]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[22]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[23]  D. V. Seggern Amplitude-distance relation for 20-second Rayleigh waves , 1977 .

[24]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[25]  J. Evernden Variation of rayleigh-wave amplitude with distance , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  Takahiro Hagiwara,et al.  A Note on the Theory of the Electromagnetic Seismograph , 1958 .

[27]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Amplitudes of surface waves and magnitudes of shallow earthquakes , 1945 .

[28]  B. B. Golit︠s︡yn,et al.  Vorlesungen über Seismometrie , 1912 .

[29]  Emil Wiechert Theorie der automatischen Seismographen , 1903 .