Whole-Body Movements Increase Arm Use Outcomes of Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in Stroke Patients

Wrist-worn accelerometers are often applied to measure arm use after stroke. They measure arm movements during all activities, including whole-body movements, such as walking. Whole-body movements may influence clinimetric properties of arm use measurements—however, this has not yet been examined. This study investigates to what extent arm use measurements with wrist-worn accelerometers are affected by whole-body movements. Assuming that arm movements during whole-body movements are non-functional, we quantify the effect of whole-body movements by comparing two methods: Arm use measured with wrist-worn accelerometers during all whole-body postures and movements (P&M method), and during sitting/standing only (sit/stand method). We have performed a longitudinal observational cohort study with measurements in 33 stroke patients during weeks 3, 12, and 26 poststroke. The P&M method shows higher daily paretic arm use outcomes than the sit/stand method (p < 0.001), the mean difference increased from 31% at week three to 41% at week 26 (p < 0.001). Differences in daily paretic arm use between methods are strongly related to daily walking time (r = 0.83–0.92). Changes in the difference between methods are strongly related to changes in daily walking time (r = 0.89). We show that not correcting arm use measurements for whole-body movements substantially increases arm use outcomes, thereby threatening the validity of arm use outcomes and measured arm use changes.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  R. Smeets,et al.  Concise Arm and Hand Rehabilitation Approach in Stroke (CARAS): A practical and evidence-based framework for clinical rehabilitation management , 2015 .

[3]  Malou H. J. Fanchamps,et al.  Development and validation of a clinically applicable arm use monitor for people after stroke. , 2018, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  Malou H. J. Fanchamps,et al.  Objectively measured arm use in daily life improves during the first 6 months poststroke: a longitudinal observational cohort study , 2021, Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation.

[5]  Andreas R. Luft,et al.  Encouragement-Induced Real-World Upper Limb Use after Stroke by a Tracking and Feedback Device: A Study Protocol for a Multi-Center, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[6]  Catherine E. Lang,et al.  Upper Extremity Use in People with Hemiparesis in the First Few Weeks After Stroke , 2007, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[7]  R. Smeets,et al.  Changes in arm-hand function and arm-hand skill performance in patients after stroke during and after rehabilitation , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke , 2018, Sensors.

[10]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Evidence of a logarithmic relationship between motor capacity and actual performance in daily life of the paretic arm following stroke. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[12]  J. Bussmann,et al.  The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  C. Lang,et al.  Changes in Upper-Extremity Functional Capacity and Daily Performance During Outpatient Occupational Therapy for People With Stroke. , 2016, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  C. Richards,et al.  Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[18]  J. Diong,et al.  National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). , 2014, Journal of physiotherapy.

[19]  María Dueñas,et al.  Simple generalized estimating equations (GEEs) and weighted generalized estimating equations (WGEEs) in longitudinal studies with dropouts: guidelines and implementation in R , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Catherine E Lang,et al.  Upper-limb activity in adults: referent values using accelerometry. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Sarah A. Moore,et al.  Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercise after Stroke (WAVES): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2016, Trials.

[22]  Matthias Egger,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[23]  C. Lang,et al.  Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Improves Over the First 12 Weeks Poststroke , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  Elizabeth Domholdt,et al.  Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications , 1993 .

[25]  S. Brauer,et al.  An accelerometry and observational study to quantify upper limb use after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation. , 2019, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.