Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills

This paper focuses on one of the factors that appears to be important in several conceptualizations of how to approach the digital divide: the differential possession of so-called Internet skills. Three large-scale performance tests are conducted to reveal the contributions of gender, age, educational level of attainment, Internet experience, and amount of Internet use on both medium- and content-related Internet skills. Age appears to have a negative influence on medium-related skills. However, there is a positive contribution to the level of content-related skills, meaning that older generations perform better than the younger. Unfortunately, they are impeded by their low level of medium-related skills in such a way that the actual result is negative. This noteworthy conclusion, to our knowledge, has hardly received any attention in digital divide research. Educational attainment appears significant for both medium- and content-related Internet skills. This conclusion contrasts somewhat with other research that claims that people learn digital skills more in practice than in formal educational settings. Internet experience only contributes to medium-related skills. It appears that content-related skills do not grow with years of Internet experience and the number of hours spent online weekly. The latter only has some effect on medium-related skills

[1]  Johannes A.G.M..  The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. , 2000 .

[2]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Cultural (Re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative , 2006 .

[3]  K. Miller.  Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes , 2002 .

[4]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Klaus Nordhausen,et al.  Modeling successful performance in Web searching , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Sirje Virkus,et al.  Information literacy in Europe: a literature review , 2003, Inf. Res..

[9]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Internet skills and the digital divide , 2011, New Media Soc..

[10]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Beyond Access: the Digital Divide and Internet Uses and Gratifications , 2003 .

[11]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Race Between Education And Technology , 2008 .

[12]  Jan Steyaert,et al.  At Home in a Digital World , 2002 .

[13]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  Africa and the digital divide , 2008, Telematics Informatics.

[14]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users' online behavior , 2009, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[16]  Ray McAleese.  Hypertext: Theory into Practice , 1998 .

[17]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Clarifying Search: A User-Interface Framework for Text Searches , 1997, D Lib Mag..

[18]  V. Cartwright,et al.  Transforming What They Read: Helping Eleven-Year-Olds Engage with Internet Information. , 2004 .

[19]  Wayne Buente,et al.  Trends in Internet information behavior, 2000–2004 , 2008 .

[20]  Wendy T. Lucas,et al.  Form and function: The impact of query term and operator usage on Web search results , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Jane Webster,et al.  Perceived disorientation: an examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[22]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender* , 2006 .

[23]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  I. Wasserman,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use , 2005 .

[25]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Contextual Navigation Aids for Two World Wide Web Systems , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study , 2000 .

[27]  Janet Morahan-Martin,et al.  How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[30]  James C. Witte,et al.  The Internet and Social Inequalities , 2009 .

[31]  William Tally,et al.  Investigating Children's Emerging Digital Literacies , 2002 .

[32]  Sanna Talja,et al.  The social and discursive construction of computing skills , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  M. Kwan.  Cyberspatial Cognition and Individual Access to Information: The Behavioral Foundation of Cybergeography , 2001 .

[34]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Measuring Internet Skills , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  J. Horrigan,et al.  Home broadband adoption 2007 , 2007 .

[36]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[37]  Andy Carvin.  More Than Just Access: Fitting Literacy and Content into the Digital Divide Equation , 2000 .

[38]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Jos de Haan,et al.  A MULTIFACETED DYNAMIC MODEL OF THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2004 .

[40]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy , 2005 .

[41]  Malcolm Otter,et al.  Lost in hyperspace: metrics and mental models , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[42]  Brad Cahoon,et al.  Teaching and Learning Internet Skills , 1998 .

[43]  Elaine Lally,et al.  At Home With Computers , 2020 .

[44]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[45]  David Bawden,et al.  Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts , 2001, J. Documentation.

[46]  Kimberly Merritt,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF SELF-REPORTED COMPUTER LITERACY: IS IT RELIABLE? , 2005 .

[47]  Johannes A.G.M..  The deepening Divide: Inequality in the information society. , 2005 .

[48]  Paul Shafer,et al.  From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda for Research on Digital Inequality , 2004 .

[49]  R. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[50]  Klaus Nordhausen,et al.  Modeling successful performance in Web searching , 2006 .

[51]  Shana M. Mason,et al.  APPLYING COMMUNICATION THEORY TO DIGITAL DIVIDE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[52]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[53]  Anne Goulding,et al.  Women and the Information Society: barriers and participation , 2003 .

[54]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[55]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[56]  S. Hick,et al.  Inequality and the digital divide : myths and realities , 2002 .

[57]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[58]  Valerie Njie,et al.  Internet Usage by Low-Literacy Adults Seeking Health Information: An Observational Analysis , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[59]  M. Warschauer.  Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[60]  Pierre Chauvin,et al.  Health information seeking on the Internet: a double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005–2006 , 2008, BMC public health.