The political economy of U.S. primary care.

Compelling evidence suggests that the United States lags behind other developed nations in the health of its population and the performance of its health care system, partly as a result of a decades-long decline in primary care. This paper outlines the political, economic, policy, and institutional factors behind this decline. A large-scale, multifaceted effort--a new Charter for Primary Care--is required to overcome these forces. There are grounds for optimism for the success of this effort, which is essential to achieving health outcomes and health system performance comparable to those of other industrialized nations.

[1]  C. Forrest,et al.  Ambulatory Care Provided by Office-Based Specialists in the United States , 2009, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[2]  C. Mosk.  The social transformation , 2007 .

[3]  A. Sicras-Mainar,et al.  Adjusted Clinical Groups use as a measure of the referrals efficiency from primary care to specialized in Spain. , 2007, European journal of public health.

[4]  J. Skinner,et al.  Extending the P4P agenda, part 2: how Medicare can reduce waste and improve the care of the chronically ill. , 2007, Health affairs.

[5]  C. Forrest,et al.  Diagnostic scope of and exposure to primary care physicians in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States: cross sectional analysis of results from three national surveys , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  The Primary CareSpecialty Income Gap: Why It Matters , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Medicare financing of graduate medical education , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  Allan H. Goroll,et al.  Fundamental Reform of Payment for Adult Primary Care: Comprehensive Payment for Comprehensive Care , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Zoe Oldfield,et al.  Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. , 2006, JAMA.

[10]  E. Dorsey,et al.  The Influence of Controllable Lifestyle and Sex on the Specialty Choices of Graduating U.S. Medical Students, 1996–2003 , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Iglehart.  Medicare's declining payments to physicians. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  U. Reinhardt.  Academic medicine's financial accountability and responsibility. , 2000, JAMA.

[15]  J. Singer,et al.  Academia's chilly climate for primary care. , 1996, JAMA.

[16]  F. Mullan.  Powerful hands: making the most of graduate medical education. , 1996, Health affairs.

[17]  L. Sandy,et al.  Specialty distribution of U.S. physicians--the invisible driver of health care costs. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  B. Culliton.  The academic-industrial complex. , 1982, Science.

[19]  T. Delbanco,et al.  Paying the physician's fee: Blue Shield and the reasonable charge. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. G. Scadding,et al.  The concept of disease , 1979, British medical journal.

[21]  G. L. Engel.  The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. , 1977, Science.