The structure function for system reliability as predictive (imprecise) probability

In system reliability, the structure function models functioning of a system for given states of its components. As such, it is typically a straightforward binary function which plays an essential role in reliability assessment, yet it has received remarkably little attention in its own right. We explore the structure function in more depth, considering in particular whether its generalization as a, possibly imprecise, probability can provide useful further tools for reliability assessment in case of uncertainty. In particular, we consider the structure function as a predictive (imprecise) probability, which enables uncertainty and indeterminacy about the next task the system has to perform to be taken into account. The recently introduced concept of ‘survival signature’ provides a useful summary of the structure function to simplify reliability assessment for systems with many components of multiple types. We also consider how the (imprecise) probabilistic structure function can be linked to the survival signature. We briefly discuss some related research topics towards implementation for large practical systems and networks, and we outline further possible generalizations.

[1]  F. Coolen,et al.  Generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components , 2013, SOCO 2013.

[2]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Imprecise Reliability , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[3]  Francisco J. Samaniego,et al.  System Signatures and Their Applications in Engineering Reliability , 2007 .

[4]  Matthias C. M. Troffaes,et al.  Introduction to imprecise probabilities , 2014 .

[5]  Richard E. Barlow,et al.  Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Models , 1976 .

[6]  María Luz Gámiz,et al.  Regression analysis of the structure function for reliability evaluation of continuous-state system , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Simon P Wilson,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Reliability of Systems and Networks Using the Survival Signature. , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  T. Aven.  On performance measures for multistate monotone systems , 1993 .

[9]  A. Bendell,et al.  The incoherency of multistate coherent systems , 1984 .

[10]  F. P. A. Coolen.  Non-parametric prediction of unobserved failure modes , 2007 .

[11]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[12]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  A nonparametric predictive alternative to the Imprecise Dirichlet Model: The case of a known number of categories , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[13]  L. M. M.-T..  Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[14]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Citation for Published Item: Use Policy Nonparametric Predictive Inference for System Reliability Using the Survival Signature , 2022 .

[15]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Predictive inference for system reliability after common-cause component failures , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Nonparametric predictive inference for system failure time based on bounds for the signature , 2013 .

[17]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Learning from multinomial data: a nonparametric predictive alternative to the Imprecise Dirichlet Model , 2005, ISIPTA.

[18]  T Coolen-Maturi,et al.  Unobserved, re-defined, unknown or removed failure modes in competing risks , 2011 .

[19]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Nonparametric predictive inference for failure times of systems with exchangeable components , 2012 .

[20]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Nonparametric Predictive Inference , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.