Rapid wetland expansion during European settlement and its implication for marsh survival under modern sediment delivery rates

Fluctuations in sea-level rise rates are thought to dominate the formation and evolution of coastal wetlands. Here we demonstrate a contrasting scenario in which land-use–related changes in sediment delivery rates drive the formation of expansive marshland, and vegetation feedbacks maintain their morphology despite recent sediment supply reduction. Stratigraphic analysis and radiocarbon dating in the Plum Island Estuary (Massachusetts, United States) suggest that salt marshes expanded rapidly during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries due to increased rates of sediment delivery following deforestation associated with European settlement. Numerical modeling coupled with the stratigraphic observations suggests that existing marshland could survive, but not form under the low suspended sediment concentrations observed in the estuary today. These results suggest that many of the expansive marshes that characterize the modern North American coast are metastable relicts of high nineteenth century sediment delivery rates, and that recent observations of degradation may represent a slow return to pre-settlement marsh extent. In contrast to ecosystem management practices in which restoring pre-anthropogenic conditions is seen as a way to increase ecosystem services, our results suggest that widespread efforts to restore valuable coastal wetlands actually prevent some systems from returning to a natural state.

[1]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean , 2005, Science.

[2]  S. Trimble.  The fallacy of stream equilibrium in contemporary denudation studies , 1977 .

[3]  James P. Morgan,et al.  RECENT GEOMORPHIC HISTORY OF PLUM ISLAND. MASSACHUSETTS AND ADJACENT COASTS , 1962 .

[4]  M. Bertness,et al.  Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[5]  David R. Foster,et al.  LONG‐TERM HISTORY OF VEGETATION AND FIRE IN PITCH PINE–OAK FORESTS ON CAPE COD, MASSACHUSETTS , 2003 .

[6]  A. C. Redfield.  Ontogeny of a Salt Marsh Estuary , 1965, Science.

[7]  J. Bratton,et al.  Anthropogenically induced changes in sediment and biogenic silica fluxes in Chesapeake Bay , 2003 .

[8]  Michael S. Kearney,et al.  Landsat imagery shows decline of coastal marshes in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays , 2002 .

[9]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Impact of dams on Yangtze River sediment supply to the sea and delta intertidal wetland response , 2005 .

[10]  R. Middleton,et al.  10Be analysis of a Quaternary weathering profile in the Virginia Piedmont , 1985 .

[11]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Patterns of sedimentation in a salt marsh-dominated estuary. , 2003, The Biological bulletin.

[12]  Grace S. Brush,et al.  Impact of historic land‐use change on sediment delivery to a Chesapeake Bay subestuarine delta , 2001 .

[13]  M. Kirwan,et al.  A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  David R. Foster,et al.  Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA , 2002 .

[15]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Coupling instrumental and geological records of sea‐level change: Evidence from southern New England of an increase in the rate of sea‐level rise in the late 19th century , 2004 .

[16]  J. Day,et al.  Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited , 1995 .

[17]  D. Merritts,et al.  Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered Mills , 2008, Science.

[18]  Antonio B. Rodriguez,et al.  Direct connectivity between upstream and downstream promotes rapid response of lower coastal‐plain rivers to land‐use change , 2009 .

[19]  Huaiyang Zhou,et al.  Distribution, source and enrichment of some chemical elements in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China , 2004 .

[20]  S. Fagherazzi,et al.  Rapid wetland expansion during European settlement and its implication for marsh survival under modern sediment delivery rates: COMMENT , 2012 .

[21]  C. Saenger,et al.  Increased Terrestrial to Ocean Sediment and Carbon Fluxes in the Northern Chesapeake Bay Associated With Twentieth Century Land Alteration , 2008 .

[22]  S. Bentley,et al.  Recent tidal-flat evolution and mangrove-habitat expansion: application of radioisotope dating to environmental reconstruction. , 2008 .

[23]  M. Rampino,et al.  Episodic growth of Holocene tidal marshes in the northeastern United States: A possible indicator of eustatic sea-level fluctuations , 1981 .

[24]  L. C. Gottschalk,et al.  Effects of Soil Erosion on Navigation in Upper Chesapeake Bay , 1945 .

[25]  L. Ward,et al.  Stratigraphy, pollen history and geochronology of tidal marshes in a Gulf of Maine estuarine system: Climatic and relative sea level impacts , 2008 .