Cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) treatment related to the risk of coronary heart disease and cost of drug treatment

OBJECTIVES To estimate the cost effectiveness of statin treatment in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) and to examine the effect of the CHD risk level targeted and the cost of statins on the cost effectiveness of treatment. DESIGN Cohort life table method using data from outcome trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The cost per life year gained for lifelong statin treatment at annual CHD event risks of 4.5% (secondary prevention) and 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.5% (all primary prevention), with the cost of statins varied from £100 to £800 per year. RESULTS The costs per life year gained according to annual CHD event risk were: for 4.5%, £5100; 3.0%, £8200; 2.0%, £10 700; and 1.5%, £12 500. Reducing the cost of statins increases cost effectiveness, and narrows the difference in cost effectiveness across the range of CHD event risks. CONCLUSIONS At current prices statin treatment for secondary prevention, and for primary prevention at a CHD event risk 3.0% per year, is as cost effective as many treatments in wide use. Primary prevention at lower CHD event risks (< 3.0% per year) is less cost effective and unlikely to be affordable at current prices and levels of health service funding. As the cost of statins falls, primary prevention at lower risk levels becomes more cost effective. However, the large volume of treatment needed will remain a major problem.

[1]  HOMAS,et al.  The Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Average Cholesterol Levels , 2000 .

[2]  Ames,et al.  PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE WITH PRAVASTATIN IN MEN WITH HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA , 2000 .

[3]  A. Gotto,et al.  Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  J. McMurray,et al.  The West of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin , 1997, BMJ.

[5]  M J Buxton,et al.  Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. , 1997, Health economics.

[6]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  N. Payne,et al.  Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality , 1997, BMJ.

[8]  K. Goa,et al.  Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its cost effectiveness in dyslipidaemia and coronary heart disease. , 1997, PharmacoEconomics.

[9]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: Identification of high-risk groups and comparison with other cardiovascular intervention trials , 1996 .

[10]  T. Lancet,et al.  West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: identification of high-risk groups and comparison with other cardiovascular intervention trials , 1996, The Lancet.

[11]  L. Ramsay,et al.  The Sheffield table for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: corrected , 1996, The Lancet.

[12]  S. Grundy More on pravastatin and coronary disease. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  B. Davis,et al.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  L. Ramsay,et al.  Lipid-lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: what policy now? , 1996, Clinical science.

[15]  L. Ramsay,et al.  Targeting lipid-lowering drug therapy for primary prevention of coronary disease: an updated Sheffield table , 1996, The Lancet.

[16]  C. Furberg,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  H Wedel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1996, European heart journal.

[18]  W. Hollingworth,et al.  Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol concentration with statins in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease: life table method applied to health authority population , 1996, BMJ.

[19]  G. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Cholesterol lowering and the use of healthcare resources. Results of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. , 1996, Circulation.

[20]  J. Myers,et al.  Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease With Pravastatin in Men With Hypercholesterolemia , 1996 .

[21]  I. U. Haq,et al.  Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering in prevention of coronary heart disease , 1995, The Lancet.

[22]  R. Beaglehole,et al.  Evidence-based management of dyslipidaemia , 1995, The Lancet.

[23]  L. Coupal,et al.  Identifying adults at increased risk of coronary disease. How well do the current cholesterol guidelines work? , 1995, JAMA.

[24]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study , 1995, BMJ.

[25]  L. Coupal,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to prevent coronary heart disease. Estimating the benefits of increasing HDL-C. , 1995, JAMA.

[26]  D. Sackett,et al.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect , 1995, BMJ.

[27]  C. Harries,et al.  General practitioners' tacit and stated policies in the prescription of lipid lowering agents. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[28]  Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1994, The Lancet.

[29]  L. Martens,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of lipid-modifying therapy in Canada: comparison of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 1994, Clinical therapeutics.

[30]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice , 1994 .

[31]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension. , 1994, European heart journal.

[32]  J. Stengård,et al.  Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase as predictors of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before clinical onset of disease , 1994, The Lancet.

[33]  A. B. Prasad,et al.  British National Formulary , 1994 .

[34]  G. Smith,et al.  Commentary: Statistical problems , 1994 .

[35]  A Briggs,et al.  Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis. , 1994, Health economics.

[36]  L. Wilkins National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). , 1994 .

[37]  Walker,et al.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients , 1994 .

[38]  L. Wilkins,et al.  National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). , 1994, Circulation.

[39]  P. Milner,et al.  Local confidential inquiry into avoidable factors in deaths from stroke and hypertensive disease. , 1993, BMJ.

[40]  A. L. Cochrane,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services , 1972 .