Constructing an Optimal Orthogonal Choice Design with Alternative-Specific Attributes for Stated Choice Experiments

The stated choice (SC) experiment is generally regarded as an effective way to obtain data for discrete choice analysis. The SC experimental design method, which determines the rule for allocating different levels to each attribute in choice situations, has a great impact on parameter estimation. The optimal orthogonal choice (OOC) design is one of the most efficient SC designs, and its use can achieve more reliable parameter estimates with an equal or lower sample size than other methods. However, the OOC design can be applied only to utility models with generic attributes, as using it to assign alternative-specific attribute levels is not discussed fully in literature. This paper provides a method for extending the use of the OOC design to alternative-specific attributes. Column vectors for alternative-specific attributes were introduced, and the value of each vector was forced to be orthogonal with other generic attributes in the same alternative. In this way, orthogonality of the OOC design was kept within an individual alternative but not necessarily across alternatives. The proposed method was compared with traditional orthogonal design and with D-efficient design (another state-of-the-art efficient design method). Three experiments using field data on mode choice were conducted. The results showed that both the proposed method and the D-efficient design had a higher efficiency than the orthogonal design. In addition, under the complex experimental setting in the real world, the proposed method outperformed the D-efficient design in the sense that almost the same efficiency could be obtained while multiple iterations for an optimal solution were avoided.

[1]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[2]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Valuing Noise Level Reductions in a Residential Location Context , 2005 .

[3]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[4]  Deborah J. Street,et al.  Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes , 2005 .

[5]  D. McFadden The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[6]  Michiel C.J. Bliemer,et al.  Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs , 2009 .

[7]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[8]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[9]  Peter Goos,et al.  A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments , 2006 .

[10]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[11]  John M. Rose,et al.  Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies , 2007 .

[12]  D. Street,et al.  Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments , 2004 .

[13]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .

[14]  John M. Rose,et al.  Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models , 2009 .

[15]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study , 2007 .

[16]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[17]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .