Regulation of Synaptic Connectivity: Levels of Fasciclin II Influence Synaptic Growth in the Drosophila CNS

Much of our understanding of synaptogenesis comes from studies that deal with the development of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Although well studied, it is not clear how far the NMJ represents an adequate model for the formation of synapses within the CNS. Here we investigate the role of Fasciclin II (Fas II) in the development of synapses between identified motor neurons and cholinergic interneurons in the CNS of Drosophila. Fas II is a neural cell adhesion molecule homolog that is involved in both target selection and synaptic plasticity at the NMJ in Drosophila. In this study, we show that levels of Fas II are critical determinants of synapse formation and growth in the CNS. The initial establishment of synaptic contacts between these identified neurons is seemingly independent of Fas II. The subsequent proliferation of these synaptic connections that occurs postembryonically is, in contrast, significantly retarded by the absence of Fas II. Although the initial formation of synaptic connectivity between these neurons is seemingly independent of Fas II, we show that their formation is, nevertheless, significantly affected by manipulations that alter the relative balance of Fas II in the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. Increasing expression of Fas II in either the presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons, during embryogenesis, is sufficient to disrupt the normal level of synaptic connectivity that occurs between these neurons. This effect of Fas II is isoform specific and, moreover, phenocopies the disruption to synaptic connectivity observed previously after tetanus toxin light chain-dependent blockade of evoked synaptic vesicle release in these neurons.

[1]  T. Kitamoto,et al.  Drosophila cholinergic neurons and processes visualized with Gal4/UAS-GFP. , 2001, Brain research. Gene expression patterns.

[2]  Ronald L. Davis,et al.  Drosophila fasciclinII Is Required for the Formation of Odor Memories and for Normal Sensitivity to Alcohol , 2001, Cell.

[3]  Michael Bate,et al.  Altered Electrical Properties in DrosophilaNeurons Developing without Synaptic Transmission , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Turrigiano AMPA Receptors Unbound Membrane Cycling and Synaptic Plasticity , 2000, Neuron.

[5]  Melitta Schachner,et al.  Synaptic Strength as a Function of Post- versus Presynaptic Expression of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule NCAM , 2000, Neuron.

[6]  S. G. Robinson,et al.  Postsynaptic expression of tetanus toxin light chain blocks synaptogenesis in Drosophila , 1999, Current Biology.

[7]  P. Hiesinger,et al.  Neuropil Pattern Formation and Regulation of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Drosophila Optic Lobe Development Depend on Synaptobrevin , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Fujioka,et al.  Analysis of an even-skipped rescue transgene reveals both composite and discrete neuronal and early blastoderm enhancers, and multi-stripe positioning by gap gene repressor gradients. , 1999, Development.

[9]  Michael Bate,et al.  Electrophysiological Development of Central Neurons in theDrosophila Embryo , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Goodman,et al.  Synapse-specific control of synaptic efficacy at the terminals of a single neuron , 1998, Nature.

[11]  C. Goodman,et al.  Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Target-Derived Fasciclin II Regulates the Pattern of Synapse Formation , 1997, Neuron.

[12]  C. Shatz,et al.  Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits , 1996, Science.

[13]  Richard D Fetter,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Structural and Functional Components of Synaptic Plasticity. I. Fasciclin II Controls Synaptic Stabilization and Growth , 1996, Neuron.

[14]  Richard D Fetter,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Structural and Functional Components of Synaptic Plasticity. II. Fasciclin II Controls Presynaptic Structural Plasticity , 1996, Neuron.

[15]  S. Schacher,et al.  Changes in expression and distribution of Aplysia cell adhesion molecules can influence synapse formation and elimination in vitro , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Broadie,et al.  Targeted expression of tetanus toxin light chain in Drosophila specifically eliminates synaptic transmission and causes behavioral defects , 1995, Neuron.

[17]  C. Goodman,et al.  Genetic analysis of Fasciclin II in drosophila: Defasciculation, refasciculation, and altered fasciculation , 1994, Neuron.

[18]  C. Goodman,et al.  Genes that control neuromuscular specificity in Drosophila , 1993, Cell.

[19]  C. Shatz,et al.  Developmental mechanisms that generate precise patterns of neuronal connectivity , 1993, Cell.

[20]  E. Kandel,et al.  Modulation of an NCAM-related adhesion molecule with long-term synaptic plasticity in Aplysia. , 1992, Science.

[21]  E R Kandel,et al.  Serotonin-mediated endocytosis of apCAM: an early step of learning-related synaptic growth in Aplysia. , 1992, Science.

[22]  C. Goodman,et al.  Genetic analysis of growth cone guidance in drosophila: Fasciclin II functions as a neuronal recognition molecule , 1991, Cell.

[23]  L. Haverkamp,et al.  Anatomical and physiological development of the Xenopus embryonic motor system in the absence of neural activity , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Oppenheim,et al.  Behavioral development in the absence of neural activity: effects of chronic immobilization on amphibian embryos , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Chiba Early development of the Drosophila neuromuscular junction: a model for studying neuronal networks in development. , 1999, International review of neurobiology.

[26]  C. Goodman,et al.  The many faces of fasciclin II: Genetic analysis reveals multiple roles for a cell adhesion molecule during the generation of neuronal specificity. , 1997, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[27]  N. Patel,et al.  Molecular genetics of neuronal recognition in Drosophila: evolution and function of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[28]  A. Ghysen,et al.  Neural enhancer-like elements as specific cell markers in Drosophila. , 1989, Development.

[29]  M. Rechsteiner,et al.  Regulation of enzyme levels by proteolysis: the role of pest regions. , 1988, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[30]  H. Kawasaki,et al.  Regulation of activity of calcium activated neutral protease. , 1988, Advances in enzyme regulation.