Balanced Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks

Empirical findings from cognitive psychology indicate that, in scenarios under high levels of uncertainty, many people tend to make irrational decisions. To address this problem, models based on quantum probability theory, such as the quantum-like Bayesian networks, have been proposed. However, this model makes use of a Bayes normalisation factor during probabilistic inference to convert the likelihoods that result from quantum interference effects into probability values. The interpretation of this operation is not clear and leads to extremely skewed intensity waves that make the task of prediction of these irrational decisions challenging. This article proposes the law of balance, a novel mathematical formalism for probabilistic inferences in quantum-like Bayesian networks, based on the notion of balanced intensity waves. The general idea is to balance the intensity waves resulting from quantum interference in such a way that, during Bayes normalisation, they cancel each other. With this representation, we also propose the law of maximum uncertainty, which is a method to predict these paradoxes by selecting the amplitudes of the wave with the highest entropy. Empirical results show that the law of balance together with the law of maximum uncertainty were able to accurately predict different experiments from cognitive psychology showing paradoxical or irrational decisions, namely in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game and the Two-Stage Gambling Game.

[1]  Andreas Wichert,et al.  Are quantum-like Bayesian networks more powerful than classical Bayesian networks? , 2018 .

[2]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[3]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[4]  Andreas Wichert,et al.  Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks for Modeling Decision Making , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[5]  Henry Brighton amp Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic minds, Bayesian brains, and cognitive mechanisms: harmony or dissonance , 2008 .

[6]  E. Pothos,et al.  A Quantum Probability Framework for Human Probabilistic Inference , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  A. Wichert,et al.  Exploring the relations between Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks and decision-making tasks with regard to face stimuli , 2017 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[9]  Andreas Wichert,et al.  Interference Effects in Quantum Belief Networks , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[11]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[12]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Living in a quantum world. , 2011, Scientific American.

[13]  V. Vedral,et al.  Entanglement in Many-Body Systems , 2007, quant-ph/0703044.

[14]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing , 2009, Biosyst..

[15]  Andreas Wichert,et al.  Balanced Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making , 2018, QI.

[16]  O. Peters The ergodicity problem in economics , 2019, Nature Physics.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Optimal inference with suboptimal models: Addiction and active Bayesian inference , 2015, Medical hypotheses.

[18]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  G. Aeppli,et al.  Entangled quantum state of magnetic dipoles , 2003, Nature.

[21]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement , 2011, ArXiv.

[22]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Information Processing Explanation of Disjunction Effects , 2006 .

[23]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms , 2009 .

[24]  B. Love,et al.  The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  David M. Grether,et al.  Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence , 1992 .

[26]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Process mining with real world financial loan applications: Improving inference on incomplete event logs , 2018, PloS one.

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[29]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  More varieties of Bayesian theories, but no enlightenment , 2011 .

[30]  Edwin T. Jaynes Prior Probabilities , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[31]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  Comparison of Quantum and Bayesian Inference Models , 2009, QI.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Josef Perner,et al.  The Disjunction Effect: Does It Exist for Two-Step Gambles? , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[34]  A. Wichert,et al.  Quantum Probabilistic Models Revisited: The Case of Disjunction Effects in Cognition , 2016, Front. Phys..

[35]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making , 2009 .

[36]  A. Pouget,et al.  Not Noisy, Just Wrong: The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability , 2012, Neuron.

[37]  Jennifer Trueblood,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Quantum Decision Model Parameters , 2012, QI.

[38]  J. Schreiber Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[39]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Cognition: Key Issues and Discussion , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[40]  David Skinner,et al.  The Physics of Quantum Mechanics , 2013 .

[41]  John E. Taplin,et al.  Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner's Dilemma games. , 2002 .

[42]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[43]  Charles Lambdin,et al.  The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons , 2007 .

[44]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.