Orientation of male gypsy moths,Lymantria Dispar (L.), to pheromone sources: The role of olfactory and visual cues

The role of olfaction and vision in the close-ranging flying and walking orientation of male gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar(L.), to females was studied in the forest and in the laboratory. In the forest, feral males found an isolated pheromone source as readily as one supplemented with female visual cues; dead, acetonerinsed females deployed without pheromone received virtually no visitations. In flight tunnel choice experiments using cylinders as surrogate trees and pheromone in different spatial configurations, visual attributes of the female did not influence either the males' choice of landing site or the efficiency with which they located the female. Rather, the presence of pheromone on the cylinder was necessary to elicit orientation as well as landing and walking on the cylinder. When a female visual model was placed in various positions around a pheromone source, walking males oriented primarily to the chemical stimulus. There were, however, indications that males would alter their walking paths in response to female visual cues over short distances (<5 cm), but only if they continued to receive pheromone stimulation. When visual and chemical cues were abruptly uncoupled by altering the trajectory of the pheromone plume, most males responded to the loss of the odor cue rather than to visual cues from the female. Temporal pheromone stimulation patterns affected male walking orientation. When stimulated by pheromone, males oriented toward the source; loss of the odor cue prompted an arearestricted local search characterized by primarily vertical and oblique movements with frequent reversals in direction. Presumably these maneuvers enhance the likelihood of recontacting the plume or serendipitously encountering the female. The apparent lack of visual response to the female is discussed in light of morphological and behavioral evidence suggesting that gypsy moths were formerly nocturnal.

[1]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  C. Doane Aspects of Mating Behavior of the Gypsy Moth , 1968 .

[3]  M. Beroza,et al.  Potent Sex Attractant of the Gypsy Moth: Its Isolation, Identification, and Synthesis , 1970, Science.

[4]  H. Shorey SEX PHEROMONES OF LEPIDOPTERA , 1970 .

[5]  Toshitaka Hidaka,et al.  Biology of Hyphantria cunea DRURY (Lepidoptera : Arciidae) in Japan. : XIV. Mating Behavior , 1972 .

[6]  N. Watanabe,et al.  BIOLOGY OF HYPHANTRIA CUNEA DRURY (LEPIDOPTERA : ARCTIIDAE) IN JAPAN. XVI. LARVAL BEHAVIOUR , 1973 .

[7]  Sex Pheromones of Lepidoptera. 42. Terrestrial Odor-Trail following by Pheromone-Stimulated Males of Trichoplusia ni , 1973 .

[8]  L. K. Gaston,et al.  Sex Pheromones of Lepidoptera. Influence of Pheromone Concentration and Visual Cues on Aerial Odor-Trail following by Males of Pectinophora gossypiella, , 1974 .

[9]  Tetsuo Saitô,et al.  Synthesis and activity of optically active disparlure , 1974 .

[10]  W. Roelofs,et al.  DIEL PERIODICITY OF MALE SEX PHEROMONE RESPONSE AND FEMALE ATTRACTIVENESS IN THE GYPSY MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE) , 1974, The Canadian Entomologist.

[11]  U. E. Brady,et al.  Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. I. Comparison of Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella and role of male scent glands , 1975 .

[12]  The distribution of Lymantria dispar and L. monacha (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Austria and West Germany. , 1975 .

[13]  E. Kramer,et al.  Orientation of the Male Silkmoth to the Sex Attractant Bombykol , 1975 .

[14]  J. Richerson,et al.  Sexual Activity of the Gypsy Moth" 2 , 1976 .

[15]  J. Richerson,et al.  PRE-MATING SEXUAL ACTIVITY OF GYPSY MOTH MALES IN SMALL PLOT FIELD TESTS (LYMANTRIA (= PORTHETRIA) DISPAR (L.): LYMANTRIIDAE) , 1976, The Canadian Entomologist.

[16]  E. Cameron,et al.  STUDIES OF THE COMPOUND EYE OF LYMANTRIA DISPAR (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE) MALES, AND BEHAVIORAL IMPLICATIONS , 1977, The Canadian Entomologist.

[17]  A stereospecific synthesis of (+)-disparlure, sex attractant of the gypsy moth , 1977 .

[18]  Disruption of Gypsy Moth Male Sex Pheromone Behavior by High Frequency Sound , 1978 .

[19]  S. Key,et al.  Short-range precopulatory behavior of males of Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae) , 1978 .

[20]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Behavioral Responses of the Gypsy Moth in a Wind Tunnel to Air-Borne Enantiomers of Disparlure , 1979 .

[21]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Courtship Behavior of the Oriental Fruit Moth (Grapholitha molesta) : Experimental Analysis and Consideration of the Role of Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Courtship Pheromones in the Lepidoptera , 1979 .

[22]  Insect-oriented locomotor responses by unmated females of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). , 1980 .

[23]  R. Cardé,et al.  Male codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella) orientation to visual cues in the presence of pheromone and sequences of courtship behaviors. , 1980 .

[24]  Comportement Sexuel De La Pyrale De La Canne Sucre Eldana Saccharina (Wlk.) Lié à dEux Phéromones Émises Par Le Male , 1981 .

[25]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Rate and diel periodicity of pheromone emission from female gypsy moths, (Lymantria dispar) determined with a glass-adsorption collection system , 1982 .

[26]  Effects of Vision on Mating Behavior of the Male Corn Earworm , 1982 .

[27]  R. Prokopy,et al.  Visual Detection of Plants by Herbivorous Insects , 1983 .

[28]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field , 1983, Nature.

[29]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Visual course control of escape responses in the cockroach Blaberus craniifer: role of internal and external orientation information , 1983 .

[30]  K. Hansen Discrimination and production of disparlure enantiomers by the gypsy moth and the nun moth , 1984 .

[31]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth , 1984 .

[32]  K. Haynes,et al.  Mate-Locating and Courtship Behaviors of the Artichoke Plume Moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) , 1984 .

[33]  P. Zagatti,et al.  Les phéromones sexuelles des zygènes. III: Le comportement de Zygaena filipendulae L. (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) , 1984 .

[34]  R. Preiss,et al.  Anemotactic orientation of gypsy moth males and its modification by the attractant pheromone (+)‐disparlure during walking , 1986 .

[35]  T. Baker,et al.  COMPARISON OF MANOEUVRES USED BY WALKING VERSUS FLYING GRAPHOLITA MOLESTA MALES DURING PHEROMONE-MEDIATED UPWIND MOVEMENT , 1987 .

[36]  J. Fullard,et al.  Auditory characteristics and sexual dimorphism in the gypsy moth , 1988 .

[37]  R. Charlton,et al.  Behavioral interactions in the courtship of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). , 1990 .

[38]  R. Cardé,et al.  Factors mediating copulatory behavior and close-range mate recognition in the male gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). , 1990 .

[39]  R. D. Collins,et al.  Influence of pheromone concentration and ambient temperature on flight of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L), in a sustained‐flight wind tunnel , 1993 .

[40]  J. Richerson Pheromone-mediated behavior of the gypsy moth , 1977, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[41]  R. T. Cardé,et al.  Mate location strategies of gypsy moths in dense populations , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[42]  T. Ono Search behavior of pheromone-stimulated potato tuber moth males (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) , 1985, Journal of Ethology.