Tomosynthesis method for depth resolution of beta emitters

The motivation of this study derives from the need for tumour margin estimation after surgical excision. Conventional beta autoradiography of beta emitters can be used to image tissue sections providing high spatial resolution compared to in-vivo molecular imaging. However, it requires sectioning of the specimen and it provides a 2D image of the tissue. Imaging of the 3D tissue sample can be achieved either by imaging sequential 2D sections, which is time-consuming and laborious, or by using a specialised detector for imaging that records the particles’ direction, in addition to their position, when they hit the detector. In this work we investigate whether a novel beta-tomosynthesis approach can be used for depth resolution of beta emitters. The technique involves acquiring multiple 2D images of the intact tissue sample while the detector rotates around the sample. The images are then combined and used to reconstruct the 3D position of the sources from a limited angle of conventional 2D autoradiography images. We present the results from Geant4 forward simulations and the reconstructed images from a breast tissue sample containing a Fluorine-18 positron emission source. The experiments show that the proposed method can provide depth resolution under certain conditions, indicating that there is potential for its use as a 3D molecular imaging technique of surgical samples in the future.

[1]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Alain Schweitzer,et al.  Autoradiography, MALDI-MS, and SIMS-MS Imaging in Pharmaceutical Discovery and Development , 2010, The AAPS Journal.

[3]  E. Solon,et al.  Quantitative whole-body autoradiography in the pharmaceutical industry. Survey results on study design, methods, and regulatory compliance. , 2001, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[4]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[6]  Jurgen Frikel,et al.  Sparse regularization in limited angle tomography , 2011, 1109.0385.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Luca Caucci,et al.  Directional charged-particle detector with a two-layer ultrathin phosphor foil , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[9]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Luca Caucci,et al.  Charged‐particle emission tomography , 2017, Medical physics.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Intraoperative beta probe: a device for detecting tissue labeled with positron or electron emitting isotopes during surgery. , 1994, Medical physics.

[12]  Umberto Veronesi,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  N. Clinthorne,et al.  Probe-guided localization of cancer deposits using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2008, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[14]  S. Gambhir Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.