A numerical study of dynamo action as a function of spherical shell geometry

Abstract The geometry of the liquid region of a planetary core can effect core convection and magnetic field generation processes. Varying the spherical shell radius ratio, χ  =  r i  /  r o , illustrates differences between planets with differing core radius ratios as well as how dynamo processes vary with time in an evolving planetary core. Here we study numerical models of thermally driven dynamo action in a rotating shell of outer radius r o with electrically conducting Boussinesq fluid that surrounds an equally conductive solid inner sphere of radius r i . Dynamo solutions are found for 0.15 ≤  χ  ≤ 0.65 at Ekman number E  = 3 × 10 − 4 , Prandtl number Pr  = 1, and magnetic Prandtl number Pm  = 5, with mechanically rigid, isothermal boundary conditions. In cases with mildly supercritical Rayleigh numbers, Ra , convection occurs in the form of columnar plumes aligned with the rotation axis. In thick-shelled cases ( χ  = 0.15), onset of axial dipolar dynamo action occurs at relatively high Ra by the action of a single turbulent columnar plume. In thinner shells ( χ  ≥ 0.25), multi-plume columnar convection generates strongly dipolar dynamo fields near the onset of convection. Although some of our control parameters are far from planetary values, the outer boundary Elsasser number, Λ , (a non-dimensional measure of magnetic field strength) for thinner shell cases is comparable to that for the Earth's core–mantle boundary and estimates for the dynamos of Jupiter and Saturn. In contrast, thick shell, single plume dynamos produce relatively low Elsasser numbers at the outer shell boundary, possibly relevant to the magnetic field of Mercury. For a single evolving planet, these results imply that a transition during early inner core growth from a single plume or regional convective regime to a multi-plume or global convective regime could produce a significant increase in the exterior global magnetic field intensity. Our calculations are consistent with observations of axial dipole dominated planetary magnetic fields and support the concept of a geocentric axial dipolar field for much of Earth's history.

[1]  Johannes Wicht Inner-core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations , 2002 .

[2]  A. Soward,et al.  The onset of thermal convection in a rapidly rotating sphere , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  The geodynamo, past, present and future , 2001 .

[4]  Masaru Kono,et al.  Effect of the inner core on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic dynamo , 1999 .

[5]  S. Labrosse Thermal and magnetic evolution of the Earth’s core , 2003 .

[6]  S. Kida,et al.  Equatorial magnetic dipole field intensification by convection vortices in a rotating spherical shell , 2002 .

[7]  S. Kida,et al.  Dynamo mechanism in a rotating spherical shell: competition between magnetic field and convection vortices , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  J. Connerney,et al.  Magnetic field of Mars: Summary of results from the aerobraking and mapping orbits , 2001 .

[9]  Jean-Paul Poirier,et al.  The age of the inner core , 2001 .

[10]  P. Roberts,et al.  Definition of the Rayleigh number for geodynamo simulation , 2001 .

[11]  B. Buffett The Thermal State of Earth's Core , 2003, Science.

[12]  C. Russell,et al.  Ganymede's magnetosphere: Magnetometer overview , 1998 .

[13]  N. Ness,et al.  The magnetic field of Mercury, 1 , 1975 .

[14]  G. Schubert,et al.  Effects of an Electrically Conducting Inner Core on Planetary and Stellar Dynamos , 2001 .

[15]  D. Stevenson Planetary magnetic fields , 2003 .

[16]  Sean C. Solomon,et al.  Mercury: the enigmatic innermost planet , 2003 .

[17]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  An Earth-like numerical dynamo model , 1997, Nature.

[18]  F. Busse,et al.  Regular and chaotic spherical dynamos , 2000 .

[19]  Gary A. Glatzmaier,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Stellar Convective Dynamos , 1984 .

[20]  Gary A. Glatzmaier,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Stellar Convective Dynamos. I. The Model and Method , 1984 .

[21]  P. Olson,et al.  Planforms in Thermal Convection With Internal Heat Sources at Large Rayleigh and Prandtl Numbers , 1990 .

[22]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study , 1999 .

[23]  Geoffrey D. Price,et al.  The influence of potassium on core and geodynamo evolution , 2003 .

[24]  J. Aubert,et al.  Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields , 2004 .

[25]  C. Hale The intensity of the geomagnetic field at 3.5 Ga: paleointensity results from the Komati Formation, Barberton Mountain Land, South Africa , 1987 .

[26]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos , 2002 .

[27]  A. Woods,et al.  On the thermal evolution of the Earth's core , 1996 .

[28]  H. K. Moffatt Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids , 1978 .

[29]  Busse,et al.  Hemispherical dynamos generated by convection in rotating spherical shells , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  J. Valet Time variations in geomagnetic intensity , 2003 .

[31]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Varying the spherical shell geometry in rotating thermal convection , 2004 .

[32]  D. Fearn,et al.  The influence of Rayleigh number, azimuthal wavenumber and inner core radius on 2- D hydromagnetic dynamos , 2000 .

[33]  F. Busse,et al.  Convection-driven quadrupolar dynamos in rotating spherical shells. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[34]  R. Phillips,et al.  Internal and tectonic evolution of Mercury , 2003 .

[35]  B. Buffett,et al.  The strength and efficiency of thermal and compositional convection in the geodynamo , 1995 .

[36]  G. Schubert,et al.  Sulfur in Mercury's Core? , 2001 .

[37]  S. J. Drew Thermal convection in a spherical shell with a variable radius ratio , 1991 .

[38]  U. Christensen,et al.  Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration , 1999 .

[39]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle , 1995 .

[40]  S. Stanley,et al.  Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus' and Neptune's unusual magnetic fields , 2004, Nature.

[41]  Gary A. Glatzmaier,et al.  Geodynamo Simulations—How Realistic Are They? , 2002 .

[42]  M. Gillan,et al.  Gross thermodynamics of two-component core convection , 2004 .