COMPARISON OF BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO CALCULATING THE WATER FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS

The water footprint has been introduced as a potential sustainability indicator for human-induced water consumption, and has frequently been studied at local, national and international scales during the last decade. While water footprints are sometimes understood as a measure that includes environmental impact assessment, the water footprint as used in this paper refers to volumes of water consumed, without including weighting procedures to allow for the assessment of impacts. Two types of approaches have been applied to calculate the water footprint in the literature: bottom-up and top-down approaches. This study compares and discusses advantages and limitations of the water footprint of nations based on two input–output top-down approaches (Water Embodied in Bilateral Trade (WEBT) and Multi-regional Input–Output Analysis (MRIO)) and of the existing national water footprint accounts from the literature based on the bottom-up approach. The differences in the bottom-up and WEBT approaches are caused by inter-sectoral cut-off, because bottom-up approaches do not consider the entire industrial supply chains, while the WEBT method covers the water footprint by tracing the whole domestic supply chain of each country. The differences in the WEBT and MRIO approaches are due to an inter-regional cut-off effect, as the WEBT approach only traces domestic supply chains whereas the MRIO approach traces entire global supply chains. We found that both bottom-up and top-down approaches are heavily dependent on the quality of existing datasets, and differ substantially. The total water footprints of nations based on different approaches vary by up to 48%, and this variation is even larger at the sector level.

[1]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  CONSTRUCTING AN ENVIRONMENTALLY-EXTENDED MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE USING THE GTAP DATABASE , 2011 .

[2]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK , 2010 .

[4]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[5]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  An input–output analysis of Australian water usage , 2001 .

[6]  Rosa Duarte,et al.  Water use in the Spanish economy: an input-output approach , 2002 .

[7]  Karine Thollier,et al.  Bottom-Up Life-Cycle:Assessment of Product Consumption in Belgium , 2006 .

[8]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Missing inventory estimation tool using extended input-output analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A guide for compiling inventories in hybrid life-cycle assessments: some Australian results , 2002 .

[10]  L. M. Hartman.  The Input-Output Model and Regional Water Management , 1965 .

[11]  Stephen A. Thompson,et al.  Water Use in the United states , 1999 .

[12]  A K Chapagain,et al.  An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: a case of Spanish tomatoes. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  S. Pfister,et al.  Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Dealing with double-counting in tiered hybrid life-cycle inventories: a few comments , 2009 .

[16]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Double‐Counting in Life Cycle Calculations , 2008 .

[17]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption , 2011 .

[18]  K. Hubacek,et al.  Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints , 2009 .

[19]  K. Hubacek,et al.  Assessing regional virtual water flows and water footprints in the Yellow River Basin, China: A consumption based approach , 2012 .

[20]  T. Wiedmann.  EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION , 2009 .

[21]  S. Pfister,et al.  The water “shoesize” vs. footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  A new and integrated hydro-economic accounting and analytical framework for water resources: a case study for North China. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  S. Lutter,et al.  Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis , 2011 .

[24]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Economic and Societal Changes in China and their Effects on Water Use , 2007 .

[25]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Water Footprinting: How to Address Water Use in Life Cycle Assessment? , 2010 .

[26]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[27]  M Smith,et al.  [CROPWAT: a computer program for irrigation planning and management]. [Spanish] , 1992 .

[28]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Economic and Societal Changes in China and their Effects onWater Use A Scenario Analysis , 2005 .

[29]  Yim Ling Siu,et al.  Spatially Explicit Analysis of Water Footprints in the UK , 2010 .

[30]  Tony Allan,et al.  The Middle East Water Question: Hydropolitics and the Global Economy , 2001 .

[31]  J. A. Allan,et al.  Virtual Water: A Strategic Resource Global Solutions to Regional Deficits , 1998 .

[32]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[33]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint , 2008 .

[34]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources , 2008 .

[36]  John Barrett,et al.  Identification of 'carbon hot-spots' and quantification of GHG intensities in the biodiesel supply chain using hybrid LCA and structural path analysis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  A. Hoekstra.  Virtual water trade : A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade , 2003 .

[38]  G. Treloar.  Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[39]  M. Lenzen,et al.  The path exchange method for hybrid LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Methods in the Life Cycle Inventory of a Product , 2009 .

[41]  S. Pfister,et al.  A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity , 2010 .

[42]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[43]  M. Curran.  Life-cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles , 1994 .

[44]  M. M. Aldaya,et al.  Water footprint analysis for the Guadiana river basin , 2008 .

[45]  P. Mitchell,et al.  'Bottom-up' approach to the implementation of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[46]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Water Footprint Manual : State of the Art 2009 , 2009 .

[47]  Herry Rachmadyanto,et al.  UNESCO-IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION , 2010 .

[48]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet , 2012 .

[49]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Dealing with double-counting in tiered hybrid life-cycle inventories: a few comments – response , 2009 .

[50]  G. Lange.  An approach to sustainable water management in Southern Africa using natural resource accounts: the experience in Namibia , 1998 .

[51]  S. Collins.  European Community , 1989, The Lancet.

[52]  M. Lenzen,et al.  How City Dwellers Affect Their Resource Hinterland , 2009 .

[53]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Footprint family technical report: Integration into MRIO model , 2011 .

[54]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[55]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern , 2006 .

[56]  Winnie Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  Reply to Pfister and Hellweg: Water footprint accounting, impact assessment, and life-cycle assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  B. Narayanan,et al.  Introduction to the Global Trade Analysis Project and the GTAP Data Base , 2012, GTAP Working Paper.

[58]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Environmental life-cycle assessment , 1996 .

[59]  T. Wiedmann.  A first empirical comparison of energy Footprints embodied in trade -- MRIO versus PLUM , 2009 .

[60]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Water footprints of nations , 2004 .

[61]  S. Suh,et al.  Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies--the case of wind power in the UK. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[62]  M. D. Sanders,et al.  Industrial Water Use , 1952 .